US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-01-29 1) Executive Summary Two China-related trade proceedings were published today, both by the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The first involves the scheduling of full five-year reviews regarding antidumping and countervailing duty orders on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from China and several other countries. The second concerns a Section 337 investigation into wireless front-end modules and devices, where the ITC seeks public interest submissions following an Initial and Recommended Determination. Key policy instruments include antidumping/countervailing duties and Section 337 exclusion orders. 2) Updates by Authority INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (ITC) Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube — AD/CVD (Scheduling of Full Five-Year Reviews) The ITC has scheduled full five-year reviews under the Tariff Act of 1930 to assess whether revoking the countervailing duty order on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from China and the antidumping duty orders from China, Mexico, South Korea, and Turkey would likely result in the continuation or recurrence of material injury to the U.S. industry. The Commission has exercised its authority to extend the review period by up to 90 days and tolled its schedule due to a lapse in appropriations. Written submissions, hearings, and filing deadlines are outlined for the review period extending through mid-2026. Authority: International Trade Commission Policy Type: AD/CVD Event Type: Scheduling notice for full five-year reviews China Indicator: Explicit Investigation Nos.: 701-TA-449 and 731-TA-1118–1121 (Third Review) Key Dates: Issued January 27, 2026; hearing scheduled June 25, 2026; final comments due August 3, 2026 Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/light-walled-rectangular-pipe-and-tube-from-china-mexico-south-korea-and-turkey-scheduling-of-full-five-year-reviews/ Wireless Front-End Modules — Section 337 Investigation (Request for Public Interest Submissions) The ITC announced the issuance of an Initial Determination on Violation of Section 337 and a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding in the investigation involving certain wireless front-end modules and devices. The investigation includes respondents Kangxi Communication Technologies (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. and Ruijie Networks Co., Ltd. of China, along with a U.S. firm. The Commission is requesting public and government submissions regarding potential public interest implications should a general or limited exclusion order or cease and desist orders be issued. Authority: International Trade Commission Policy Type: ITC_337 (Section 337 Investigation) Event Type: Notice requesting public interest submissions China Indicator: Explicit Investigation No.: 337-TA-1413 Key Companies: Kangxi Communication Technologies (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.; Ruijie Networks Co., Ltd.; Grand Chip Labs, Inc. Submission Deadline: February 24, 2026 Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-wireless-front-end-modules-and-devices-containing-the-same-notice-of-request-for-submissions-on-the-public-interest/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The ITC is conducting full five-year reviews concerning AD/CVD orders on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from China and other countries, with deadlines extending into August 2026. The Commission extended the review period due to its complexity and tolled the schedule following a lapse in appropriations. In a separate proceeding, the ITC’s administrative law judge issued Initial and Recommended Determinations regarding Section 337 violations in wireless technology components. Public interest submissions are invited concerning potential exclusion orders in the wireless modules case involving Chinese and U.S. respondents. Both notices were issued under the ITC’s authority pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930. 4) Full Source Links (Index) Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube — AD/CVD Scheduling Review Wireless Front-End Modules — Section 337 Public Interest Notice 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Certain Wireless Front-End Modules and Devices Containing the Same; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest
Federal Trade Agency Requests Public Comments in Wireless Module Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On January 23, 2026, the administrative law judge (ALJ) at the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) issued an Initial Determination. The ruling found a violation of Section 337 in Investigation No. 337-TA-1413. The ALJ also issued a Recommended Determination on the remedy and bonding. The Commission is now asking for public comments based on the proposed actions. These may include a general or limited exclusion order. These orders would apply to certain wireless front-end modules and devices that include them. The devices in question were imported, sold for importation, or sold after importation by the following companies: Kangxi Communication Technologies (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. of Shanghai, China Grand Chip Labs, Inc. of Tustin, California Ruijie Networks Co., Ltd. of Fuzhou, China In addition to exclusion orders, the ALJ recommended cease and desist orders directed at all three companies. The Commission seeks input on how the proposed orders could impact the public. The public and government agencies may submit responses by February 24, 2026. Submissions must be no longer than five pages, including any attachments. They must be filed electronically. Comments should mention the investigation number, “Inv. No. 337-TA-1413,” clearly on the cover or first page. Key public interest topics that the Commission wants comments on are: (i) How the affected wireless modules and products are used in the U.S. (ii) Any concerns about public health, safety, or welfare related to these products. (iii) U.S.-made products that could replace the targeted devices if excluded. (iv) Whether suppliers in the U.S. can meet demand in a short, reasonable time. (v) How the exclusion orders would affect consumers in the U.S. The request for comments is made under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) and the Commission’s rules (19 CFR part 210). The Commission may choose not to exclude the products if the exclusion would negatively affect U.S. public health, the economy, or consumers. Comments containing confidential information must follow the Commission’s rules. Any such submissions must be marked clearly and filed together with a non-confidential version. All submissions—unless marked as confidential—will be available for public viewing on the Commission’s Electronic Docket Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For assistance, contact Houda Morad, Esq. in the Office of the General Counsel at (202) 708-4716. For help with EDIS access, email edismail@usitc.gov. For general Commission information, visit https://www.usitc.gov. This notice was issued by order of the Commission on January 26, 2026. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission, signed the notice. It was published in the Federal Register on January 29, 2026 (Volume 91, Number 19, Pages 3927–3928). Document Number: 2026-01729. Billing Code: 7020-02-P. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From China, Mexico, South Korea, and Turkey, Scheduling of Full Five-Year Reviews
U.S. Opens Full Five-Year Review of Pipe and Tube Imports from Four Countries Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) has scheduled full five-year reviews concerning light-walled rectangular pipe and tube imports. These reviews involve products from China, Mexico, South Korea, and Turkey. The Commission is reviewing whether revoking the orders would lead to harm to U.S. industry. These orders include both a countervailing duty order on Chinese imports and antidumping duty orders on imports from all four countries. The review is being carried out under the Tariff Act of 1930. The USITC determined on November 24, 2025, that full reviews should proceed. This followed a notice of institution and review of responses. The Federal Register published this determination on December 8, 2025 (90 FR 56801). The USITC also announced a 90-day extension of the review period because the case was marked “extraordinarily complicated.” A government shutdown also caused a delay in Commission operations, leading to a pause in the schedule. The reviews are being conducted under section 751(c)(5) of the law (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)). The Commission has posted the related public documents online. All businesses, users, and consumer groups who want to take part must file an “entry of appearance.” This must be done within 45 days after the notice is published in the Federal Register. Those who had filed a notice at the start of the review do not need to refile. The public service list will contain the names and addresses of all participants. The public can follow updates and access documents via the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (https://edis.usitc.gov). Only electronic filings will be accepted. No paper-based or in-person filings will be accepted at this time. Parties who want access to business proprietary information (BPI) must apply no later than 45 days after this notice. Access requires an Administrative Protective Order (APO). The Secretary will maintain a separate service list for these parties. The staff report will become available on June 4, 2026. A public version will follow afterward. An in-person hearing on the reviews will take place on Thursday, June 25, 2026, starting at 9:30 a.m. The deadline to request a hearing appearance is Thursday, June 18, 2026, at 5:15 p.m. Parties requesting to appear by videoconference must include a statement explaining why in-person attendance is not possible. Requests due to illness or a positive COVID-19 result may be submitted by 3 p.m. the day before. A prehearing conference, if needed, is scheduled for 9:30 a.m. on Wednesday, June 24, 2026. Hearing participants must file written testimony and presentation slides by noon on that date. All oral testimony, in-court and written submissions for the hearing, must follow USITC rules. Parties wishing to present information in camera must request this no later than seven business days before the hearing. Prehearing briefs must follow rule section 207.65 and be filed by 5:15 p.m. on June 15, 2026. Posthearing briefs and final hearing submissions are due by 5:15 p.m. on July 7, 2026. Any member of the public who is not a formal party may submit information by the same July 7, 2026, deadline. On July 30, 2026, the Commission will release any new information to all parties. Parties may submit final comments by 5:15 p.m. on August 3, 2026. These comments must not include new facts and must follow rule section 207.68. All submissions must meet the Commission’s rules found in sections 201.6, 201.8, 207.3, and 207.7. A detailed filing guide is available at: https://www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_on_filing_procedures.pdf. Documents must be served on all other parties and include a certificate of service. Contact Eric Forden at (202) 205-3235 for more details. Hearing-impaired individuals can use the TDD at 202-205-1810. This notice was issued on January 27, 2026, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Federal Register Document: 2026-01761 Printed: January 29, 2026 Pages: 3928–3930 BILLING CODE: 7020-02-P Available at: www.usitc.gov Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-01-28
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-01-28 1) Executive Summary Two sanctions-related actions were published today by the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). Both actions involve updates to OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN) List pursuant to Executive Orders 14059 and 13902. The measures include designations of individuals, entities, and vessels associated with illicit drug trafficking and other sanctionable activities. The principal policy tool applied today is economic sanctions through SDN listings. 2) Updates by Authority Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) Costa Rica Individuals and Entities — Sanctions Listing (Sanctions Action) OFAC added several individuals and entities in Costa Rica to the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons (SDN) List under Executive Order 14059, Imposing Sanctions on Foreign Persons Involved in the Global Illicit Drug Trade. The action blocks all property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction of the designated persons and entities. Key Details: Authority: Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control Policy Type: Sanctions Listing Event Type: Sanctions China Indicator: None Legal authority: Executive Order 14059 (E.O. 14059) Designated entities/persons: Multiple individuals and companies in Costa Rica, including Luis Manuel Picado Grijalba and affiliates Effective date: January 22, 2026 Federal Register: Volume 91, Number 18, Pages 3782–3783 (FR Doc. 2026-01661) Source: Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-actions-7/ Persons and Vessels — Sanctions Listing (Sanctions Action) OFAC announced the designation of additional persons and vessels under its Sanctions programs, identifying them on the SDN List pursuant to Executive Order 13902. The listed vessels are noted as property in which blocked persons have an interest. All associated property and interests in property within U.S. jurisdiction are blocked. Key Details: Authority: Department of the Treasury, Office of Foreign Assets Control Policy Type: Sanctions Listing Event Type: Sanctions China Indicator: None Legal authority: Executive Order 13902 (E.O. 13902) Designated assets: Individuals and vessels Effective date: January 23, 2026 Federal Register: Volume 91, Number 18, Pages 3783–3786 (FR Doc. 2026-01646) Source: Link: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-action-15/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) OFAC issued two separate SDN List updates on January 22 and 23, 2026. The first action targeted Costa Rican individuals and entities involved in illicit drug activities under Executive Order 14059. The second action added individuals and vessels associated with sanctions authorized under Executive Order 13902. Both actions result in blocking of property and prohibitions on transactions by U.S. persons. These are routine updates within OFAC’s ongoing sanctions enforcement operations. 4) Full Source Links (Index) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-actions-7/ (Costa Rica Individuals and Entities – E.O. 14059) https://lawyerfanzhang.com/notice-of-ofac-sanctions-action-15/ (Persons and Vessels – E.O. 13902) 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Action
U.S. Treasury Issues New Sanctions on Individuals and Vessels Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes Date: 2026-01-28 Source: Federal Register, Volume 91, Number 18 On January 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued a new sanctions action. This action adds persons and vessels to the Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). These designations mean all property and interests in property of the listed persons or vessels that are in the U.S. or under the control of U.S. persons are blocked. U.S. persons are generally not allowed to conduct transactions or provide services to the persons or vessels on the list. OFAC identified one or more legal grounds that allow the action under Executive Order 13902. The assets of the named persons and vessels are now legally frozen under U.S. jurisdiction. The vessels named have been identified as property in which a blocked person has an interest. This action took effect as of January 23, 2026. The notice was published in the Federal Register on January 28, 2026, in pages 3783 to 3786. People can find the SDN List and learn more about OFAC sanctions by visiting the website: https://ofac.treasury.gov. For further questions, the public can contact: Associate Director for Global Targeting at 202-622-2420 Assistant Director for Licensing at 202-622-2480 Assistant Director for Sanctions Compliance at 202-622-2490 Or use the contact form at https://ofac.treasury.gov/contact-ofac The action was announced by Bradley T. Smith, Director of the Office of Foreign Assets Control. Federal Register Document Number: 2026-01646 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of OFAC Sanctions Actions
U.S. Treasury Imposes Sanctions on Individuals and Entities in Costa Rica for Drug Trade Ties Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) has announced new sanctions related to the global illicit drug trade. This action follows Executive Order 14059, “Imposing Sanctions on Foreign Persons Involved in the Global Illicit Drug Trade,” signed on December 15, 2021. The designations were made on January 22, 2026. The listed individuals and entities are now added to OFAC’s Specially Designated Nationals and Blocked Persons List (SDN List). All property and interests in property subject to U.S. jurisdiction are now blocked. U.S. persons are generally prohibited from engaging in transactions with them. INDIVIDUALS SANCTIONED: Anita Yorleny Mc Donal Rodriguez – Also known as Anita McDonald Rodriguez – From Limon, Costa Rica – Date of Birth: October 4, 1974 – Cedula No. 701120514 – Linked to Luis Manuel Picado Grijalba – Designated under Section 1(b)(iii) of Executive Order 14059 for acting for or on behalf of Picado Grijalba Estefania Mc Donald Rodriguez – Also known as Estefania McDonald Rodriguez – From Costa Rica – Date of Birth: April 9, 1992 – Cedula No. 702100887 – Linked to Luis Manuel Picado Grijalba – Designated under Section 1(b)(iii) of Executive Order 14059 for acting for or on behalf of Picado Grijalba Tonny Alexander Pena Russell – Also known as Tonny Alexander Peña Russell – From Limon, Costa Rica – Date of Birth: December 29, 1987 – Cedula No. 701820333 – Linked to Luis Manuel Picado Grijalba – Designated under Section 1(b)(i)(B) of Executive Order 14059 for providing support to Picado Grijalba Luis Manuel Picado Grijalba – Also known as “Shock” – From Limon, Costa Rica – Date of Birth: December 22, 1981 – Cedula No. 801190098 – Designated under Section 1(a)(i) of Executive Order 14059 for contributing to the international proliferation of illicit drugs Jordie Kevin Picado Grijalba – Also known as “Noni” – From Limon, Costa Rica – Date of Birth: May 19, 1993 – Cedula No. 702200042 – Designated under Section 1(a)(i) of Executive Order 14059 for contributing to the international proliferation of illicit drugs ENTITIES SANCTIONED: 3-101-507688 SA – Located in Limon, Costa Rica – Tax ID No. 3-101-507688 – Linked to Estefania Mc Donald Rodriguez – Designated under Section 1(b)(iii) of Executive Order 14059 ASOCIACION DE LIDERES LIMONENSES DEL SECTOR PESQUERO (also known as “ASOLIPES”) – Located in Limon, Costa Rica – Tax ID No. 3-002-384913 – Linked to Anita Yorleny Mc Donal Rodriguez – Designated under Section 1(b)(iii) of Executive Order 14059 CELAJES DE YORK CDY SA – Located in Limon, Costa Rica – Tax ID No. 3-101-313254 – Linked to Estefania Mc Donald Rodriguez – Designated under Section 1(b)(iii) of Executive Order 14059 INVERSIONES LAURITA L AND L SA (also known as INVERSIONES LAURITA L&L SA) – Located in San Jose, Costa Rica – Tax ID No. 3-101-703720 – Linked to Estefania Mc Donald Rodriguez – Designated under Section 1(b)(iii) of Executive Order 14059 MAGIC ESTHETIC SALON SA – Located in San Jose, Costa Rica – Tax ID No. 3-101-800676 – Linked to Estefania Mc Donald Rodriguez and Anita Yorleny Mc Donal Rodriguez – Designated under Section 1(b)(iii) of Executive Order 14059 U.S. persons are forbidden from doing business with these individuals and entities. Any property or interests under U.S. jurisdiction are now frozen. OFAC’s SDN List and sanctions details are publicly available on its website: https://ofac.treasury.gov For further questions, contact OFAC at 202-622-2420 or visit https://ofac.treasury.gov/contact-ofac Official reference: Federal Register Volume 91, Number 18 (January 28, 2026), Document No. 2026-01661. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-01-27
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-01-27 1) Executive Summary Eight China-related trade remedy and Section 337 events were published on January 27, 2026. The U.S. Department of Commerce (International Trade Administration) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) were the primary authorities involved. Actions included antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders, administrative review results, a circumvention inquiry, and several Section 337 patent-investigation updates. Covered policy tools include AD/CVD orders, Section 337 investigations, and enforcement actions across industrial materials, solar products, and intellectual property disputes. 2) Updates by Authority International Trade Commission (ITC) Certain Processed Slabs and Methods for Making Same — ITC Section 337 (Notice of Institution of Investigation) The ITC instituted Investigation No. 337-TA-1482 following a complaint by Cambria Company LLC alleging patent infringement of quartz surface products and methods for making the same (U.S. Patents 10,195,762; 10,252,440; and 12,370,718). The Commission will examine potential Section 337 violations and consider exclusion and cease-and-desist orders. – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION – Policy Type: ITC_337 – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Key Dates: Complaint filed December 19, 2025; Investigation instituted January 23, 2026 – Link: Source Certain Hydrodermabrasion Systems and Components Thereof — ITC Section 337 (Commission Review and Extension) The Commission decided to review in part the final initial determination in Investigation No. 337-TA-1408 concerning alleged patent infringement of hydrodermabrasion systems (U.S. Patent 11,865,287). Additional written comments are requested on remedies, public interest, and bonding. The target completion date was extended to March 23, 2026. – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION – Policy Type: ITC_337 – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – Key Dates: Review vote January 22, 2026; Comments due February 5 and 12, 2026 – Link: Source Certain Crafting Machines and Components Thereof — ITC Section 337 (Request for Public Interest Submissions) The ITC issued a notice requesting public submissions in Investigation No. 337-TA-1426 involving crafting machines imported by several Chinese and other entities. The ALJ issued an initial determination on violation and recommended general and limited exclusion orders and cease-and-desist orders against the named respondents. Comments on public interest issues are due by February 23, 2026. – Authority: INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION – Policy Type: ITC_337 – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Key Date: Initial Determination issued January 21, 2026 – Link: Source Department of Commerce – International Trade Administration (ITA) Thermoformed Molded Fiber Products from China and Vietnam — Countervailing Duty Orders (Final) Based on affirmative final findings by Commerce and the ITC, countervailing duty orders were issued on thermoformed molded fiber products from China and Vietnam. The ITC found material injury to a U.S. industry and critical circumstances for Vietnam, resulting in retroactive duties. – Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD_CVD (CVD Orders) – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Key Date: Orders effective January 27, 2026 – Link: Source Thermoformed Molded Fiber Products from China and Vietnam — Antidumping Duty Orders (Final) Commerce issued companion antidumping duty orders covering the same products from China and Vietnam, following affirmative determinations by both Commerce and the ITC. The orders require cash deposits and create annual inquiry service lists per recent rulemaking. – Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD_CVD (AD Orders) – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Key Date: Orders effective January 27, 2026 – Link: Source Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells (Solar Cells) from China — Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review (2022) Commerce finalized its 2022 review, finding countervailable subsidies for Chinese solar cell producers. It applied adverse facts available to several companies and set company-specific and non-selected rates. – Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD_CVD (CVD Administrative Review) – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Key Date: Results issued December 29, 2025 – Link: Source Initiation of AD/CVD Administrative Reviews — Multiple Countries (Including China) Commerce initiated administrative reviews for numerous AD and CVD orders with November 2025 anniversaries, including several cases involving China (e.g., diamond sawblades, lightweight thermal paper, chlorinated isocyanurates, aluminum lithographic plates). Procedures for separate rate applications and service list maintenance were outlined. – Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD_CVD (Administrative Review Initiations) – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT (multiple Chinese exporters listed) – Key Date: Applicable January 27, 2026 – Link: Source Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from China — Continuation of AD and CVD Orders (Sunset Review) Following affirmative determinations by Commerce and the ITC in the second five-year (sunset) review, both antidumping and countervailing duty orders on Chinese wire rod remain in effect. Authorities found revocation would likely lead to recurrence of dumping, subsidization, and injury. – Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD_CVD (Sunset Review Continuation) – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Key Date: Continuation effective December 29, 2025 – Link: Source Certain Brake Drums from China — Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry (AD/CVD Orders) Commerce initiated a country-wide inquiry to determine whether compacted graphite iron brake drums from China (including model M328D557 made by PanAsia CVD (HK) Ltd.) constitute later-developed merchandise circumventing existing brake drum AD and CVD orders. – Authority: DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, International Trade Administration – Policy Type: AD_CVD (Circumvention Inquiry) – Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY – China Indicator: EXPLICIT – Key Date: Initiation effective January 27, 2026 – Link: Source 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The ITC opened three new or continuing Section 337 investigations involving alleged patent infringement and requested public input on potential exclusion orders. Commerce issued both antidumping and countervailing duty orders on thermoformed molded fiber products from China and Vietnam. Commerce initiated a circumvention inquiry on Chinese compacted graphite iron brake drums to assess potential evasion of existing AD/CVD orders. AD/CVD administrative reviews were launched across multiple Chinese product categories under November anniversary dockets. The U.S. government reaffirmed continuation of AD and CVD orders on Chinese carbon and alloy steel wire rod after sunset review findings of likely recurrence of injury. 4) Full Source
Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks From Germany: Final Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023
Commerce Finds Dumping of Steel Fluid End Blocks from Germany in 2023 Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On January 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published the final results of its administrative review on forged steel fluid end blocks from Germany. The Department determined that certain producers and exporters from Germany sold these products in the United States at prices below normal value during the period of review. The review covered the calendar year of January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. The sole respondent company in this review was BGH Edelstahl Siegen GmbH. The Commerce Department found a weighted-average dumping margin of 11.92 percent for BGH. These results followed a preliminary review published on May 14, 2025 (Federal Register 90 FR 20451). A post-preliminary memorandum was issued on August 27, 2025, which included changes to the differential pricing analysis. Subsequent deadlines were adjusted due to a lapse in federal appropriations and a government shutdown in late 2025. Deadlines were tolled by 47 days on November 14, 2025, and an additional 21 days on November 24, 2025, to address an electronic filing backlog. The final results were completed and released on January 20, 2026. No changes were made to the calculations from the post-preliminary results. Commerce conducted this review under section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The merchandise reviewed falls under the scope of the antidumping duty order issued on January 29, 2021 (86 FR 7528), covering forged steel fluid end blocks from Germany and Italy. Commerce reviewed all briefs submitted and responded to issues raised, which are outlined in the “Issues and Decision Memorandum” available via ACCESS at https://access.trade.gov. Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties on applicable imports. For BGH, the assessment rates will be calculated based on the value and duties of each importer’s specific sales. Commerce will issue assessment instructions for CBP within 35 days after publication of these final results. If a party files a summons with the U.S. Court of International Trade, duty assessments will be postponed as required. Cash deposit requirements have also been updated. For BGH, the deposit rate is set at 11.92 percent, based on these final results. For other companies not reviewed, prior rates still apply. If the exporter is not reviewed but the producer is, the producer’s rate applies. All other producers or exporters remain subject to the all-others rate of 4.79 percent. Commerce reminds importers of their obligation under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to certify whether they were reimbursed for duties. Failure to provide this certificate may result in the assumption of reimbursement and lead to double assessments. Parties under Administrative Protective Order are reminded of their obligation to return or destroy confidential information in line with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). This notice was signed by Deputy Assistant Secretary Christopher Abbott and issued under sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act. Further details can be found in the official Federal Register Notice: Document Number 2026-01596. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks From Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023
Forged Steel Fluid End Blocks from Italy: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of the 2023 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on forged steel fluid end blocks from Italy. The review covers the period from January 1, 2023, to December 31, 2023. Two main Italian producers/exporters were examined: Lucchini Mamé Forge S.p.A. (with its affiliates Lucchini Industries S.r.l. and Lucchini RS S.p.A.) and Cogne Acciai Speciali S.p.A. The Commerce Department found that Lucchini Mamé Forge S.p.A. had a weighted-average dumping margin of 11.71 percent. In contrast, Cogne Acciai Speciali S.p.A. received a dumping margin of 0.00 percent. The decision modifies the previous preliminary results issued on May 14, 2025. Changes were made after a post-preliminary analysis on September 29, 2025, where the Commerce Department adjusted its approach to the differential pricing analysis. On August 8, 2025, the agency extended the deadline for final results by 60 days. Due to the government shutdown and the resulting system delays, Commerce tolled all administrative deadlines twice: once by 47 days on November 14, 2025, and again by 21 days on November 24, 2025. On December 22, 2025, Commerce again extended the schedule, making the final results due on January 21, 2026. The final conclusions, including calculations and decisions, are detailed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum published alongside the final results. The document is available on ACCESS, the centralized system for importing and anti-dumping cases. The scope of the order includes all forged steel fluid end blocks from Italy, as reaffirmed in the January 29, 2021, Federal Register notice establishing the antidumping orders. Commerce stated that it has made changes since the preliminary results. These were based on issues raised in briefs submitted by interested parties. All such issues are listed in the appendix to the final notice. For assessment purposes, the Commerce Department will direct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties based on specific ad valorem calculations. For companies like Lucchini with a dumping margin above de minimis, duties will apply. Cogne Acciai Speciali, with a 0.00 percent rate, will face no such duties. If imported entries were made by a company unaware that their goods were heading to the United States, Commerce will instruct CBP to apply the “all-others” rate of 7.33 percent. This rate also applies when no specific rate is available for an involved company in the transaction. Assessment instructions will be issued no earlier than 35 days after this Federal Register notice. If a legal challenge follows, CBP will delay action until the time for seeking an injunction expires. Cash deposit requirements are also updated. Starting from the publication date of this notice, importers must follow the new rates. For Lucchini, the cash deposit will be set at 11.71 percent. For Cogne, it will be 0.00 percent. Companies not covered in this review will continue with their last assigned rate or the all-others rate of 7.33 percent if no rate exists. Importers are reminded of their responsibility to file certificates under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) regarding the reimbursement of antidumping or countervailing duties. If not filed properly, Commerce may assume reimbursement occurred and double the duties applied. Parties under Administrative Protective Order (APO) must return or destroy confidential materials, per 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Not doing so is a punishable violation. The full list of issues discussed in this review includes: Whether Commerce incorrectly increased Lucchini’s costs. Whether scrap was deducted twice in Lucchini’s calculations. Whether specific sales should have been excluded when calculating Lucchini’s cash deposit rate. The actions are authorized by sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the related regulations. Christopher Abbott signed the notice on January 20, 2026, as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Brake Drums From the People’s Republic of China: Initiation of Circumvention Inquiry on the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Department of Commerce Starts Brake Drum Circumvention Inquiry Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce), through its International Trade Administration, has begun a formal circumvention inquiry. The focus is on brake drums from the People’s Republic of China made from compacted graphite iron (CGI). This inquiry responds to a request filed by Webb Wheel Products, Inc. (Webb) on November 17, 2025. Webb claims that CGI brake drums, including model number M328D557 from PanAsia CVD (HK) Limited, are later-developed merchandise. They believe these products are being imported in a way that avoids existing antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. Commerce is treating this as a country-wide inquiry. This means all relevant CGI brake drum imports from China are included, not just those from one company. The inquiry was initiated under Section 781(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and 19 CFR 351.226. An opposition comment was filed by CAIEC Trailer Master Co., Ltd. on November 27, 2025. Webb submitted rebuttal comments on December 17, 2025. Commerce also issued a supplemental questionnaire to Webb. Webb responded to this questionnaire on January 12, 2026. The scope of the original AD and CVD orders includes brake drums made of gray cast iron. They must have an inside diameter between 14.75 inches and 16.6 inches and weigh more than 50 pounds. These drums may be finished or unfinished. They are included whether imported alone or with non-subject parts like hubs. The circumvention inquiry covers CGI brake drums with the same size and weight limits. These drums are made in China and shipped to the United States. Commerce is considering whether they are similar enough to be covered by the original orders. Commerce looks at several criteria when deciding if later-developed merchandise counts as circumvention: If the new and old products look the same. If customers expect the same things from both. If they are used in the same way. If they are sold through the same channels. If they are marketed similarly. Commerce also looks at cost and product classification. Products are not excluded from orders just because they have extra functions or fall under different tariff codes, unless those functions are the main use and are expensive to add. Commerce will handle the AD and CVD inquiries together using the antidumping record, as stated in 19 CFR 351.226(m)(2). As the inquiry begins, Commerce has told U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to continue suspending liquidation of imports already under suspension. If the inquiry finds circumvention, new and unsuspended entries will also be suspended. Duties will be applied accordingly. This initiation does not decide the outcome. It only means Commerce has found enough support in Webb’s request to begin the inquiry. Commerce plans to issue a preliminary decision by June 26, 2026 (150 days after this notice). A final decision is expected by November 23, 2026 (300 days after this notice), unless deadlines are extended or the inquiry is partially or fully cancelled. This initiation notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on January 22, 2026. Document Number: 2026-01598 Published: 2026-01-27 Federal Register Volume: 91, Number 17, Pages 3435–3437 Agency: U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration For questions, contact: Justin Enck — (202) 482-1614 Walter Schaub — (202) 482-0907 U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue NW Washington, DC 20230 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order and Countervailing Duty Order
U.S. Keeps Tariffs on Steel Wire Rod from China Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce announced it will continue the antidumping and countervailing duty orders on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from China. This decision is based on reviews done by both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The agencies found that removing the orders would likely lead to continued or renewed unfair trade actions from China. The orders target steel wire rod made from carbon and alloy steel. These products are round, hot-rolled, and in coils. They are less than 19 millimeters wide. Products used as stainless steel, tool steel, high nickel steel, ball-bearing steel, and concrete rods are not included. Also excluded are free-cutting steels. These are special types with high amounts of elements like lead, sulfur, or phosphorus. Products meeting the main description but not excluded are still part of the order. These steel wire rods are mainly classified under several Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) codes, including: 7213.91.3011 7213.91.3015 7213.91.3020 7213.91.3093 7213.91.4500 7213.91.6000 7213.99.0030 7227.20.0030 7227.20.0080 7227.90.6010 7227.90.6020 7227.90.6030 7227.90.6035 Some imports under 7213.99.0090 and 7227.90.6090 may also be covered if they fit the required description. The original orders were put in place on January 8, 2015. In 2025, Commerce and the ITC started their second five-year review of these duties. Commerce shared its findings on August 25 and 26, 2025. It said that ending the tariffs could bring back dumping and illegal subsidies from China. The ITC agreed and released its final decision on December 29, 2025. Because of the ITC’s final decision, the continuation of the orders became official on December 29, 2025. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will keep collecting cash deposits at the current rates for imports affected by these duties. Commerce plans to begin the next review 30 days before the fifth anniversary of the ITC’s most recent determination. Parties involved must still follow rules protecting business data shared during the review process. This includes destroying or returning materials under the Administrative Protective Order as required by law. This notice follows sections 751(c), 751(d)(2), and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930. It is published under 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Thermal Paper From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Department of Commerce Releases Preliminary Results on Thermal Paper from Korea Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes On January 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published the preliminary results of its administrative review of the antidumping duty order on thermal paper from the Republic of Korea. These results cover the review period of November 1, 2023, through October 31, 2024. Background The antidumping duty order on thermal paper from Korea was issued on November 22, 2021. On November 1, 2024, Commerce invited interested parties to request a review of the order for the 2023–2024 period. On December 9, 2024, Commerce extended deadlines for preliminary results by 90 days. Additional deadline extensions of 47 days and 21 days were issued on November 14 and November 24, 2025, due to a federal government shutdown. A further extension was granted on December 22, 2025. As a result, the deadline for preliminary results became January 21, 2026. Review Process and Methodology Commerce conducted this review under section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. Calculations were made using constructed export prices under section 772, and normal value was calculated under section 773 of the Act. Scope of the Order The order covers thermal paper products from Korea. A complete description of the scope is available in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. Partial Rescission of Review Commerce is rescinding the administrative review for 15 companies listed in Appendix II. This action is taken under 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), which allows rescission when there are no suspended entries of the subject merchandise for liquidation. Commerce previously notified parties of its intent to rescind the review for these companies on February 4, 2025. No comments were submitted in response. Companies Rescinded Akon Rulo Kagit Plastik Imalat IHR ITH. SAN. TIC. A.S. Amtress (M) Sdn. Bhd. Besto Sdn. Bhd. Convertidoras PCM, S.A. de C.V. Dor Etiket San VE Tic. Ltd. Engin Kagir Mamulleri San. Tic. Formas para Negocios, S.A. de C.V. Formularios de Mexico S.A. de C.V. Kagit Mamulleri San. Tic. Ltd., Stl. Kooka Paper Manufacturing Sdn. Bhd. Papeles y Conversiones de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Sailing Paper (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. ShenZhen Sailing Paper Co., Ltd. Wellden (M) Sdn. Bhd. Wingle Industrial (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. Results of Review Commerce determined that thermal paper from Korea was not sold in the United States at less than normal value during the review period. The companies and their dumping margins are as follows: Hansol Paper Company: 0.00% Tele-Paper (M) Sdn. Bhd.: 0.00% Hansol Paper Company is also known as Hansol Paper Co., Ltd. Disclosure and Public Comments Commerce will release its calculations and analysis within five days of publication of the notice. Interested parties may submit case briefs within 21 days after publication. Rebuttal briefs must be submitted within five days after that. All submissions must be made using the Enforcement and Compliance ACCESS database. A table of contents and table of authorities are required in briefs. A public executive summary of each issue should be no more than 450 words. Hearings Requests for a hearing must be submitted within 30 days after publication. Hearings will be limited to issues raised in briefs. If requested, Commerce will schedule and notify parties of the date and time. Assessment Rates Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess duties based on the final results. If any final margins are zero or de minimis, the entries will be liquidated without duties. Hansol’s importer-specific duties will be based on the ratio of total duties to entered value. If no margin or a de minimis margin is found, entries will be duty-free. Tele-Paper’s assessment rate will match Hansol’s. For rescinded companies, duties will match the cash deposit rate at entry time. Cash Deposit Instructions Following final results, Commerce will set new cash deposit rates: Companies listed in final results will use their assigned rates. Companies not reviewed will use the rate from the most recent segment. If only the manufacturer is reviewed, the manufacturer’s rate will apply. The all-others rate remains 6.19%. These rates will remain in effect until further notice. Next Steps Commerce intends to publish the final results within 120 days of January 27, 2026. These results will include analysis of all issues raised in briefs. Reminder to Importers Importers must file certificates stating if duties were reimbursed. Failing to file may result in Commerce assuming reimbursement occurred, doubling duties. Legal Notice This information is issued under sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and 19 CFR 351.213 and 351.221(b)(4). Signed: Christopher Abbott Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations Performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance Appendix I – Topics Covered I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Methodology V. Recommendation Appendix II – Companies Rescinded from Review Akon Rulo Kagit Plastik Imalat IHR ITH. SAN. TIC. A.S. Amtress (M) Sdn. Bhd. Besto Sdn. Bhd. Convertidoras PCM, S.A. de C.V. Dor Etiket San VE Tic. Ltd. Engin Kagir Mamulleri San. Tic. Formas para Negocios, S.A. de C.V. Formularios de Mexico S.A. de C.V. Kagit Mamulleri San. Tic. Ltd., Stl. Kooka Paper Manufacturing Sdn. Bhd. Papeles y Conversiones de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Sailing Paper (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. ShenZhen Sailing Paper Co., Ltd. Wellden (M) Sdn. Bhd. Wingle Industrial (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews
Commerce Department Begins Trade Reviews Covering 2024-2025 Estimated reading time: 7–12 minutes On January 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published a notice in the Federal Register (91 FR 3421-3428). The notice announces the initiation of administrative reviews for multiple antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) cases. The reviews cover merchandise with anniversaries in November 2024 and include investigations from several countries. Timing and Procedures Commerce received timely review requests as required by 19 CFR 351.213(b). Reviews are for the period of review (POR) stated for each case. Commerce may limit respondent numbers. Selection may use U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data or Quantity and Value (Q&V) questionnaires. CBP or Q&V data will be added to the record within five days of the notice. Respondent selection decisions will occur within 35 days. Collapsing of companies for AD respondent selection is limited. Commerce will collapse companies only where a prior review segment already found them to be a single entity. Parties must identify previously collapsed firms and cite the determination. Firms must provide Q&V data individually unless previously collapsed under an official segment with a final decision. Companies with no sales or entries during the POR may notify Commerce within 30 days of publication, so Commerce may consider canceling their review. Withdrawal of Review Requests Parties may withdraw requests for reviews within 90 days of the notice. Commerce may grant time extensions for withdrawals case-by-case. Particular Market Situation (PMS) Allegations PMS allegations under section 773(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930 must be filed within 20 days after submitting Section D questionnaire responses. Separate Rates in NME Countries Commerce assumes exporters in Non-Market Economies (NME) are government-controlled, unless proven otherwise. To qualify for separate rates, parties must submit: A Separate Rate Certification (if they had a separate rate before and no changes occurred); or, A Separate Rate Application (if they are new or have seen company changes). Forms are due 14 calendar days from the notice date. Applications apply equally to NME-owned, foreign-owned, and foreign sellers. Companies selected for individual examination must respond fully to the AD/CVD questionnaire. This applies even if they filed certifications. Certification Eligibility for Subject/Non-subject Merchandise Companies that wish to certify goods with possible subject and non-subject markings must file a Certification Eligibility Application. The form is online and must be filed within 30 calendar days of publication. Companies that file the Certification Application and are then selected as mandatory respondents must complete the full questionnaire. Review Initiations Commerce has initiated reviews for the following orders: AD Reviews: Argentina: Oil Country Tubular Goods (A-357-824), 11/01/2024–10/31/2025 Siderca S.A.I.C. Tenaris Global Services S.A. Tubos de Acero de Mexico S.A. Austria: Strontium Chromate (A-433-813), 11/01/2024–10/31/2025 Habich GmbH Brazil: Certain Aluminum Foil (A-351-856), 11/01/2024–10/31/2025 Companhia Brasileira de Alumínio CBA Itapissuma Ltda. France: Strontium Chromate (A-427-830), 11/01/2024–10/31/2025 Societe Nouvelle des Couleurs Zinciques Germany: Thermal Paper (A-428-850), 11/01/2024–10/31/2025 Includes multiple Mexican and German producers India: Paper File Folders (A-533-910), 11/01/2024–10/31/2025 Navneet Education Limited Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe (A-533-867), 11/01/2024–10/31/2025 Ratnamani Metals & Tubes Ltd. Suncity Metals & Tubes Private Ltd Japan: Aluminum Lithographic Printing Plates, 05/01/2024–10/31/2025 Fujifilm Corporation Fujifilm Shizuoka Co., Ltd. Mexico: Multiple orders covering: Freight Rail Couplers (A-201-857) Oil Country Tubular Goods (A-201-856) Refined Copper Pipe and Tube (A-201-838) Steel Reinforcing Bar (A-201-844) Oman: Certain Aluminum Foil (A-523-815), 11/01/2024–10/31/2025 Oman Aluminium Rolling Company SPC Republic of Korea: Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe (A-580-809), 11/01/2024–10/31/2025 Listed several producers Thermal Paper (A-580-911), 11/01/2024–10/31/2025 Republic of Türkiye: Certain Aluminum Foil (A-489-844), 11/01/2024–10/31/2025 Steel Reinforcing Bar (A-489-819), 11/01/2024–10/31/2025 Spain: Thermal Paper (A-469-824), 11/01/2024–10/31/2025 Taiwan: Circular Welded Steel Pipe (A-583-814), 11/01/2024–10/31/2025 China: Multiple reviews including: Aluminum Lithographic Printing Plates (A-570-156) Fresh Garlic (A-570-831) Lightweight Thermal Paper (A-570-920) Seamless Copper Pipe and Tube (A-570-964) Diamond Sawblades (A-570-900) CVD Reviews: Oman: Certain Aluminum Foil (C-523-816), 01/01/2024–12/31/2024 Korea: Oil Country Tubular Goods (C-580-913), 01/01/2024–12/31/2024 Includes SeAH Steel Corporation and its affiliate Türkiye: Certain Aluminum Foil (C-489-845), 01/01/2024–12/31/2024 Steel Reinforcing Bar (C-489-819), 01/01/2024–12/31/2024 China: Aluminum Lithographic Printing Plates (C-570-157), 03/01/2024–12/31/2024 Chlorinated Isocyanurates (C-570-991), 01/01/2024–12/31/2024 Lightweight Thermal Paper (C-570-921), 01/01/2024–12/31/2024 Duty Absorption Reviews Domestic parties may request a duty absorption review within 30 days of this notice. The request must name the exporter or producer. Gap Period Liquidation For first-time reviews, Commerce will not assess AD/CVD on any entries made in a “gap” period. Administrative Protective Orders Interested parties must file applications under 19 CFR 351.305. Letters of appearance are also required under 19 CFR 351.103(d). Factual Information Requirements Submitters must comply with 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) and 351.301. All submissions must declare which category the data falls under. Late or misclassified filings may be rejected. Certification Requirements All factual observations must be certified for accuracy. Certification formats are outlined in the Final Rule of July 17, 2013. Extension of Time Requests All requests for extensions must be made before the deadline. For concurrent submissions by multiple parties, requests made after 10 a.m. on the due date are untimely. These reviews will conclude with final results by November 30, 2026. Published in the Federal Register, dated 2026-01-22. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022
U.S. Commerce Finalizes 2022 Duty Review on Chinese Solar Cells Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final determination in the 2022 countervailing duty (CVD) review of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells from China. These cells are commonly used in making solar panels. The review covered the time period from January 1, 2022, to December 31, 2022. Commerce determined that Chinese producers and exporters received government subsidies. As a result, duties will be applied to imports of these products. The review was conducted under docket number C-570-980. BACKGROUND The preliminary results were published on April 21, 2025. Commerce accepted comments from interested parties. On August 1, 2025, Commerce extended the deadline for final results to October 20, 2025. Later, due to a government shutdown, deadlines were tolled by 47 days on November 14, 2025, and again by 21 days on November 24, 2025. The final results were completed by December 29, 2025, and published on January 27, 2026. SCOPE OF THE ORDER The order applies to crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells from China, whether or not they are assembled into modules. SUBSIDY FINDINGS Commerce followed the law outlined in the Tariff Act of 1930. It confirmed that certain financial support from the Chinese government gives companies a benefit. These benefits were also found to be specific to certain companies or industries. CHANGES IN RESPONDENTS Changzhou Zhaojing Light Energy Co., Ltd. (Light Energy) was replaced with its unaffiliated exporter Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited (Yingli China) due to information on the record. Commerce also revised the adverse facts available (AFA) rate. Yingli China’s final rate was adjusted to match the AFA rate used for Yangzhou Jinghua New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. and Jiangsu Highhope International Group Corporation (High Hope). NON-SELECTED COMPANIES There are six companies under review that were not individually investigated. Normally, Commerce would use a weighted average of the mandatory respondents’ rates, but in this case, all mandatory rates were based on facts available. Because of this, Commerce used the 2021 non-selected rate, which is 9.07%. FINAL RESULTS These are the final subsidy rates for the period: Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited: 117.41% Jiangsu Highhope International Group Corporation (and affiliates): 117.41% Yangzhou Jinghua New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.: 117.41% Non-selected companies: 9.07% See Appendix II for the full list of non-selected companies. DISCLOSURE Commerce will release the analysis and calculations for these results within five days of publication. ASSESSMENT U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess duties on entries of these goods. Instructions are expected no earlier than 35 days after publication. If court actions are filed, CBP will be instructed to delay liquidation until matters are resolved. CASH DEPOSITS Commerce will instruct CBP to collect cash deposits based on the final rates from the date of publication. These deposits will remain in effect until further notice. REMINDER ABOUT PROTECTIVE ORDERS Parties handling confidential data under administrative protective order (APO) must follow regulations for its destruction. Any misuse can result in penalties. APPENDIX I – ISSUES DISCUSSED Whether to rescind the review for Light Energy. Revisions to adverse facts available calculation. Revisions to the non-selected companies rate. Whether Yingli China qualifies for a lower rate. Review status for all BYD entities. Instructions to CBP regarding liquidation. APPENDIX II – NON-SELECTED COMPANIES Anji Dasol Solar Energy Science & Technology Co., Ltd. BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd.; Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd.; BYD Company Ltd. Changzhou Trina PV Ribbon Materials Co., Ltd.; Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd.; Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science and Technology Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar Co., Ltd.; Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; Yancheng Trina Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd. Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd. Toenergy Technology Hangzhou Co., Ltd. Trina Solar Science & Technology (Thailand) Ltd. Authority: Sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Regulations: 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Date: 2025-12-29 Signed: Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations End of Notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Thermoformed Molded Fiber Products From the People’s Republic of China and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Antidumping Duty Orders
U.S. Sets Antidumping Duties on Molded Fiber Products from China and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes WASHINGTON, D.C. — On January 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced new antidumping duty (AD) orders on thermoformed molded fiber products from the People’s Republic of China and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. These duties follow final findings by both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). Both agencies confirmed that imports of these products from China and Vietnam are being sold in the United States at less than fair value. These sales caused material injury to a U.S. industry. The orders apply to molded fiber products formed with cellulose fibers. These are shaped using heated molds and dried or cured while in the mold. Items affected include plates, bowls, trays, lids, food packaging, and other packaging made of molded fiber. The products are dense, with a fiber density above 0.5 grams per cubic centimeter. They may come from many types of fiber sources. These include wood, crops, and recycled materials. The products may also have added features like anti-bacterial or flame-resistant chemicals. They may be finished or processed in various ways—including dyeing, cutting, trimming, printing, or coating. The Department of Commerce stated that U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will collect antidumping duties on unliquidated entries of the covered goods. These include imports from May 12, 2025, the date the preliminary determinations were published. However, this does not include entries imported after November 8, 2025, when the provisional measures expired and before the ITC final determination was published. CBP will now reinstate the suspension of liquidation for products from China and Vietnam. It will also require cash deposits equal to dumping margins adjusted for subsidy offsets. These margins were listed in Commerce’s final determinations on September 30, 2025. Commerce extended the standard four-month suspension period to six months upon request of major exporters from both countries. The extended suspension period ran from May 12, 2025, to November 8, 2025. Entries that came in after November 8, 2025, but before the January 27, 2026 order publication, will not be subject to antidumping duties. The scope of the orders also includes molded fiber products that are finished or processed in a third country. As long as the product was originally made in China or Vietnam and the second-country processing does not change the product’s basic character, it stays under the order’s scope. Some exclusions apply. These include packaging that surrounds non-subject merchandise when imported, like molded fiber used to hold electronics. Also excluded are products already covered under other specific AD and countervailing duty (CVD) orders, such as paper plates. The Department of Commerce will also maintain an annual inquiry service list for each order. Parties interested in appearing on the list must file an entry of appearance in the ACCESS system within 30 days of the order’s publication. This list helps ensure that all relevant parties are notified of scope rulings and actions related to the order. The Governments of China and Vietnam, and the original petitioners, will be placed on the annual inquiry service list automatically in future years. But they must initially submit their entries following this notice. These orders are now in full effect. Further updates and instructions will be published on the ACCESS website or posted through official Federal Register notices. The commerce action stems from investigations under case numbers A-570-182 (China) and A-552-845 (Vietnam). All entries of affected products from these countries will now be subject to U.S. antidumping law. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Thermoformed Molded Fiber Products From the People’s Republic of China and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Issues Countervailing Duty Orders on Imports of Molded Fiber Products from China and Vietnam Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On January 27, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued countervailing duty (CVD) orders on thermoformed molded fiber products from the People’s Republic of China and the Socialist Republic of Vietnam. These orders are based on affirmative final findings by both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC confirmed that U.S. industries are being harmed by unfairly subsidized imports from China and Vietnam. The Department of Commerce first made its affirmative final determinations on September 30, 2025. The ITC issued its final affirmative injury determinations on January 5, 2026. The ITC also determined that critical circumstances exist for products imported from Vietnam. As a result of the findings, countervailing duties will be collected on certain molded fiber products imported from both countries. These duties apply to products from Vietnam that were entered or withdrawn for consumption on or after December 14, 2024. For China, the duties apply to entries made on or after March 14, 2025. The scope of the orders includes molded fiber products used for packaging and food service, such as plates, bowls, trays, clamshells, and lids. These products are made using cellulose fibers and are hardened using heat-molded forms. They can be made from any fiber source and may include additives or surface treatments. Imports of these kinds of products from Vietnam are subject to retroactive duties because of the ITC’s critical circumstances finding. Retroactive duties cover a 90-day period before the suspension of liquidation, beginning December 14, 2024. After the December 14 and March 14 preliminary determinations were published, Commerce instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of entries. However, due to the four-month time limit on preliminary countervailing measures, this suspension ended on July 11, 2025. Entries made between July 12, 2025, and the publication of the ITC’s final determination are not subject to countervailing duties. Moving forward, CBP will reinstitute suspension of liquidation and require cash deposits for entries. Cash deposit amounts will match the subsidy rates found in the final Commerce determinations. These apply to producers and exporters specifically listed and apply to any others under designated all-others rates. Commerce will maintain an “annual inquiry service list” for these orders in its document system called ACCESS. Parties must register within 30 days to be included. Petitioners and foreign governments will be automatically added once they register for the first time. Products excluded from these orders include those covered by earlier orders on paper plates from China, Thailand, and Vietnam. Also excluded are molded fiber products used as packaging containing prepackaged non-subject goods, such as packaging around electronics. Commerce’s action marks the formal issuance of these CVD orders under section 706(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. These measures aim to address unfair trade practices that harm U.S. industries. Full details, including changes and contact information for officials Allison Hollander and Thomas Martin, are available in the Federal Register notice published on January 27, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Crafting Machines and Components Thereof; Notice of Request for Submissions on the Public Interest
U.S. Trade Commission Seeks Public Input on Crafting Machines Investigation Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On January 21, 2026, a U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) administrative law judge issued an Initial Determination on a violation of Section 337 and on motions for summary determination. The judge also made a Recommended Determination on remedy and bonding in the investigation titled “Investigation No. 337-TA-1426.” The Commission is now asking for public comments. These comments are to explain how the recommended actions may impact the public. This case is about certain crafting machines and parts of those machines. These machines are believed to violate U.S. patent laws. The Commission may use exclusion and cease and desist orders if a violation is confirmed. The requested public input should focus on these four specific recommended orders: A general exclusion order for crafting machines and their parts that violate U.S. Patent No. D893,563. A limited exclusion order for crafting machines and their parts from Bozhou Wanxingyu Technology Co. Ltd., Bozhou Zhongdaxiang Technology Co., Ltd., and Shanghai Sishun E-commerce Co., Ltd. (called “Vevor Respondents”) that violate U.S. Patent No. D1,029,090. A limited exclusion order for crafting machines and their parts from Liping Zhan (“Konduone”), that violate claims 8-12 of U.S. Patent No. 11,905,646. Cease and desist orders directed at the Vevor Respondents and Konduone. The Commission is seeking comments on how these recommended orders would affect: Public health and welfare in the United States. Competitive conditions in the U.S. economy. The production of similar or competing products in the United States. U.S. consumers. Specifically, the Commission wants to know: How the products are used in the U.S. If there are any public health, safety, or welfare concerns. If any U.S.-based makers can replace these products. If complainants or their partners can supply enough alternatives quickly. How these orders may affect U.S. consumers. All comments must be five pages or less. They must be filed by February 23, 2026. Filing must follow Commission rules under 19 CFR 210.4(f). All submissions should include the investigation number “Inv. No. 337-TA-1426.” Comments should be filed via the Commission’s electronic docket at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help with filing, contact the Secretary at (202) 205-2000. Questions regarding this matter may be directed to Cathy Chen, Esq., at (202) 205-2392. People who want to file confidential documents must clearly mark them and follow Commission rules under 19 CFR 201.6(b) and 210.5(e)(2). A redacted version of each confidential filing must also be submitted. Non-confidential documents will be available for public viewing on EDIS. This call for comments is issued under the authority of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure. Issued: January 22, 2026. Lisa Barton,Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Hydrodermabrasion Systems and Components Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination To Review in Part a Final Initial Determination Finding a Violation; Extension of the Target Date for Completion of the Investigation; Request for Written Submissions on Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding
U.S. International Trade Commission Reviews Patent Case on Hydrodermabrasion Systems Estimated reading time: 5–8 minutes On January 22, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (Commission) announced its decision to review in part a Final Initial Determination (FID) from an administrative law judge (ALJ) in Investigation No. 337-TA-1408. The investigation concerns certain hydrodermabrasion systems and their components. The Commission also extended the deadline for completing the investigation to March 23, 2026. The investigation began on July 17, 2024. It was based on a complaint filed by HydraFacial LLC, formerly known as Edge Systems LLC, based in Long Beach, California. HydraFacial claimed violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The case involves the importation and sale of hydrodermabrasion systems allegedly infringing U.S. Patent No. 11,865,287. The named respondents were Cartessa Aesthetics, LLC of Melville, New York, and Eunsung Global Corp. of the Republic of Korea. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not participating in this investigation. On January 21, 2025, the Commission ended the case for Eunsung Global after a consent order. On April 11, 2025, the Commission removed some patent claims (claims 1-10, 15, 17, 20, 23, 26, 28-31, 33-37, and 39-45 of the ‘287 patent) from the investigation. This was based on an unopposed motion by HydraFacial. On August 26, 2025, the ALJ issued the FID, finding that Cartessa had violated Section 337. Cartessa filed a petition to review the FID on September 8, 2025. HydraFacial responded on September 16, 2025. Due to a government shutdown, the Commission had earlier extended its review deadline to January 22, 2026. It had also asked parties to address the impact of the upcoming expiration of the ‘287 patent. As of January 22, 2026, the Commission decided to partly review the FID. The review covers: The meaning and application of the patent term “fluid communication” and its role in infringement and the domestic industry test. Whether the term “block” is too vague (“indefinite”) and how that affects validity and infringement findings, including prior related rulings (specifically Order Nos. 29 and 50). Arguments about whether the patent is unenforceable due to prosecution laches (an unfair delay in pursuing patent rights). The Commission may issue a remedy after its final decision. This can include: An exclusion order preventing the import of the accused products into the U.S. A cease and desist order stopping further sales and imports by the respondent. The Commission is asking for written submissions from the parties and from interested members of the public. These submissions should discuss: The type of remedy that should be ordered, How the proposed remedy would affect public health, U.S. competition, American production, and consumers, Any bond amount that should apply during the 60-day Presidential review period if a remedy is issued. The Commission directs the Complainant (HydraFacial) to: Specify the remedy it is seeking, Submit proposed remedial orders, State the expiration date of the ‘287 patent, Provide HTSUS (Harmonized Tariff Schedule) subheadings for the accused products, List all known importers of the products in question. Key deadlines: All initial written submissions with proposed orders must be filed by February 5, 2026. All reply submissions must be filed by February 12, 2026. Party submissions must follow page limits: 10 pages for opening statements, 5 pages for replies. Third-party submissions, including government agency comments, are limited to 10 pages. All submissions must be filed electronically and reference Investigation No. 337-TA-1408. Specific procedure rules apply under 19 CFR 210.4(f). Confidential documents must be properly marked and handled according to Commission rules. A redacted non-confidential version must also be filed. The Commission’s action is authorized under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and Commission Rules under 19 CFR Part 210. Issued by order of the Commission on January 22, 2026. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Processed Slabs and Methods for Making Same; Notice of Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade Commission Opens Investigation into Imported Processed Slabs Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On January 27, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) published a notice of a new investigation. The investigation is numbered 337-TA-1482. It concerns “certain processed slabs and methods for making same.” The complaint was filed by Cambria Company LLC. Cambria is located in Belle Plaine, Minnesota. The company filed its initial complaint on December 19, 2025. A supplement to the complaint was filed on January 5, 2026. The complaint alleges violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The violations concern the importation, sale for importation, and the sale after importation of certain products. These products include veined processed slabs made with quartz, glass, or minerals. The complaint claims that these products infringe on patents owned by Cambria. The listed patents are: U.S. Patent No. 10,195,762 (claims 22–25) U.S. Patent No. 10,252,440 (claims 14–20) U.S. Patent No. 12,370,718 (claims 1–2 and 4–16) Cambria also claims that an industry exists in the United States. This is a required element under Section 337 for the investigation to proceed. Based on the complaint, the USITC has ordered that an investigation be started. The investigation will determine if a violation of Section 337 has occurred. The investigation will also decide if an industry in the U.S. exists as required by law. The products under investigation are plainly described as “veined processed slabs produced with quartz, glass, or minerals.” Cambria Company LLC is named as the complainant. The parties accused of importing or selling the infringing products include the following: Surface Warehouse, L.P. d/b/a US Surfaces and Vadara Quartz Surfaces, Austin, Texas M S International Inc. d/b/a MSI, Orange, California Arizona Tile, LLC, Tempe, Arizona OHM International Inc., Monroe Township, New Jersey Architectural Surfaces Group LLC, Spicewood, Texas Caesarstone Ltd., Kibbutz Sdot-Yam, Israel Caesarstone USA, Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina LX Hausys, Ltd., Seoul, Republic of Korea LX Hausys America, Inc., Alpharetta, Georgia Mohawk Industries, Inc., Calhoun, Georgia Dal-Tile, LLC, Dallas, Texas The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will also participate in the case. The Chief Administrative Law Judge of the USITC will assign a judge to preside over the investigation. Each respondent must reply to the complaint and notice of investigation within 20 days of service. Responses must follow USITC rules under 19 CFR 210.13. No extensions will be granted unless good cause is shown. If a respondent does not reply on time, they may lose the right to object to the claims. If that happens, the judge can accept the facts in the complaint as true and issue an exclusion order or cease and desist order. The complaint and non-confidential documents can be found online at: https://edis.usitc.gov. General information on the USITC is at: https://www.usitc.gov. Issued by order of the USITC on January 23, 2026. Signed, Lisa BartonSecretary to the Commission Federal Register Document Number: 2026-01612Filed: January 26, 2026Billing Code: 7020-02-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-01-26
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-01-26 1) Executive Summary Today’s update covers nine trade remedy and enforcement actions involving both China and other U.S. trading partners. The principal authorities include the U.S. Department of Commerce (DOC) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The DOC addressed multiple antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) matters—final orders, administrative reviews, scope rulings, and covered merchandise findings—while the ITC issued determinations and instituted new investigations, including a Section 337 complaint involving Chinese electric unicycles. The policy instruments span AD/CVD enforcement, injury investigations, critical circumstances determinations, and public interest comment solicitations. 2) Updates by Authority ITC (U.S. International Trade Commission) Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts — Institution of AD/CVD Investigations (Preliminary Phase)The ITC opened preliminary phase AD and CVD investigations on imports of citric acid and certain citrate salts from Canada and India, alleging sales at less than fair value and subsidization. The Commission must reach preliminary determinations by March 9, 2026, and transmit its views to Commerce by March 16, 2026. Authority: International Trade Commission Policy Type: AD/CVD Event Type: Trade Remedy Investigation (Preliminary) Key IDs: Inv. Nos. 701-TA-783–784 and 731-TA-1771–1772 Key Dates: Staff conference Feb. 11, 2026; preliminary determination due Mar. 9, 2026 Source: Link Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico — AD Review Investigation (Changed Circumstances)The ITC instituted an investigation under section 751(b) of the Tariff Act to reassess its final determination in AD Investigation No. 731-TA-747, examining whether revocation of the AD order on fresh tomatoes from Mexico would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. A hearing will be held on May 19, 2026. Authority: International Trade Commission Policy Type: AD/CVD Event Type: Changed Circumstances Review Key IDs: Inv. No. 751-TA-30 Dates: Review instituted Jan. 21, 2026; hearing May 19, 2026; final comments due June 25, 2026 Source: Link Gyro‑Stabilized Electric Unicycles — Section 337 Complaint (Public Interest Solicitation)The ITC received a Section 337 complaint titled Certain Gyro-Stabilized Electric Unicycles and Components Thereof, docket number 3877, filed by U.S. companies Inventist, Inc. and Alien Technology Group, Inc. against several Chinese manufacturers, including Guangzhou Veteran Intelligent Technology, Dong Guan BEGODE, Inmotion Technologies, Shenzhen King Song, and Guangzhou JiDongTai Intelligent Equipment Co. The Commission seeks public comments on potential public interest issues related to requested exclusion or cease-and-desist orders. Authority: International Trade Commission Policy Type: Section 337 (ITC_337) Event Type: Complaint Receipt and Comment Solicitation China Indicator: Explicit Key IDs: Docket No. 3877 Key Dates: Comments due eight days after Federal Register publication Source: Link DOC (U.S. Department of Commerce – International Trade Administration) Notice of Scope Rulings — Multiple AD/CVD Orders Including ChinaCommerce published a quarterly list of scope rulings (July 1–September 30, 2025), including findings for China: Finished heat sinks (aluminum extrusions): within scope. Fresh garlic in brine: excluded from scope. Memory foam mattresses: within scope. Wooden cabinets and vanities: within scope. Additional rulings cover products from India, Mexico, and Thailand. Authority: Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance Policy Type: AD/CVD (Scope Rulings) Event Type: Quarterly Publication China Indicator: Explicit Dates: Period covered July–September 2025 Source: Link Slag Pots from China — AD and CVD Final Orders IssuedFollowing affirmative injury determinations by both Commerce and the ITC, AD and CVD orders were issued on slag pots from the People’s Republic of China. The orders cover slag pots with nominal capacities of 65–1,200 cubic feet. Customs and Border Protection will collect duties consistent with the published rates. Authority: Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance Policy Type: AD/CVD Event Type: Final Orders China Indicator: Explicit Key IDs: A-570-196, C-570-197 Key Dates: Applicable Jan. 26, 2026; ITC injury determination Nov. 25, 2025 Source: Link Mobile Access Equipment from China — Amended Final CVD Results (2022 Review)Commerce corrected a ministerial error in the 2022 administrative review for mobile access equipment and subassemblies thereof from China, revising the cash deposit rate for Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd. and its cross-owned affiliates. The revised subsidy rate is 33.10 percent ad valorem. Authority: Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance Policy Type: CVD (Administrative Review Amendment) Event Type: Amended Final Results China Indicator: Explicit Key ID: C-570-140 Period: Jan. 1–Dec. 31, 2022 Source: Link Certain Chassis and Subassemblies from China — Preliminary Covered Merchandise InquiryCommerce preliminarily determined that axle beams, slider boxes, and landing gear sets imported by AXN Heavy Duty LLC (now FEMC LLC) from China are covered merchandise under the AD/CVD orders on chassis and subassemblies. These findings are importer-specific and may trigger duty collection for relevant entries. Authority: Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance Policy Type: AD/CVD (Covered Merchandise Inquiry) Event Type: Preliminary Determination China Indicator: Explicit Key IDs: A-570-135, C-570-136 Date: Applicable Jan. 26, 2026 Source: Link Certain Hardwood Plywood Products from China — Final Results of AD/CVD Reviews (No Shipments)Commerce concluded that four Chinese exporters of hardwood plywood made no shipments during 2023. The review period was Jan. 1–Dec. 31, 2023. Three firms (Eagle Industries, Golden Bridge Industries, and Lechenwood Viet Nam Co.) were found eligible to continue certifying future shipments as non-subject merchandise under the certification program. Authority: Department of Commerce, Enforcement and Compliance Policy Type: AD/CVD (Administrative Review Final Results) Event Type: Final Results, No Shipments China Indicator: Explicit Key IDs: A-570-051, C-570-052 Date: Applicable Jan. 26, 2026 Source: Link 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) Commerce finalized new AD and CVD orders on slag pots from China, confirming the product’s inclusion and injury findings. The ITC initiated three investigations: a new AD/CVD case on citric acid and citrate salts, a review of the Mexican tomato order, and a Section 337 complaint involving Chinese electric unicycles. Multiple China-related rulings clarified scope and coverage—covering heat sinks, chassis components, and hardwood plywood—reinforcing enforcement under existing orders. Commerce’s amended CVD review for Zhejiang Dingli Machinery adjusted subsidy rates following correction of an error. Quarterly scope rulings summarized treatment of products under several China-origin AD/CVD orders across industries. 4) Full Source Links (Index) Citric Acid – ITC Preliminary AD/CVD Institution Fresh Tomatoes from Mexico – ITC Review Investigation Gyro-Stabilized Electric Unicycles – ITC Section 337
Certain Hardwood Plywood Products From the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Administrative Reviews of the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2023
Commerce Finds No Shipments of Chinese Hardwood Plywood from Certain Exporters in 2023 Review Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released its final results for the 2023 administrative reviews of the antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on hardwood plywood from the People’s Republic of China. The review period covered January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. Commerce found that four exporters did not ship hardwood plywood covered by the AD and CVD orders during the review period. The four exporters are: Eagle Industries Company Limited Golden Bridge Industries Pte Ltd. Greatwood Hung Yen Joint Stock Company Lechenwood Viet Nam Company Limited Three of these exporters were already eligible or became eligible under prior reviews to certify their shipments as non-subject merchandise. Commerce is allowing these three companies—Eagle, Golden Bridge, and Lechenwood—to continue certifying their plywood exports as non-subject merchandise. Commerce received case briefs from U.S. Importers and Hardwoods Specialty Products. These briefs raised issues reviewed in detail in the accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum. After reviewing the arguments, Commerce made no changes to the preliminary results. Details on each issue raised and Commerce’s response are in Appendix II of the decision. In May 2025, Commerce issued the preliminary results and found no shipments from the four companies. That conclusion is now confirmed as final. No party requested a review of the China-wide entity in this AD administrative review. Thus, the China-wide rate of 114.72 percent remains unchanged. Commerce did not address separate rate status for the four companies in this review because they had no subject entries during the period. For assessment, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate entries from the four companies without regard to duties. These instructions will be issued after 35 days from the date of publication, unless there is litigation. Cash deposit rates for these companies remain unchanged from the most recent segment where each was assigned a rate. For other Chinese exporters not receiving separate rates, the China-wide rate (114.72 percent) applies. For non-Chinese exporters without their own rate, the rate assigned to their Chinese supplier or the China-wide rate applies. For CVD, cash deposits for non-reviewed firms and no-shipment companies remain at the all-others rate or their most recently assigned specific rate. This notice also reminds importers of their duty to file certifications regarding reimbursement of AD/CVD duties. Failure to comply could lead to double AD duties or increased AD liability in the amount of the CVD. Finally, parties with access to proprietary information under administrative protective order (APO) must destroy or return those materials timely to avoid sanctions. The final results are published pursuant to sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(5). For questions, contact Kabir Archuletta at (202) 482-2593. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Chassis and Subassemblies Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Determination of Covered Merchandise Inquiry
Commerce Department Finds Chinese Chassis Parts Imported by AXN Fall Under AD/CVD Orders Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Date: 2026-01-26 The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued a preliminary determination as part of a covered merchandise inquiry regarding certain chassis and subassembly parts imported from China by FEMC LLC, previously known as AXN Heavy Duty LLC. This action follows a referral from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP). Commerce began its investigation on April 3, 2025, to determine if certain products are subject to antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders established against Chinese-sourced chassis and subassemblies. Commerce initially planned to issue its final findings on December 29, 2025, but the decision was postponed due to a lapse in federal funding and a subsequent government shutdown. As a result, all administrative deadlines were extended by 68 days, moving the preliminary determination date to March 9, 2025. Scope of the Orders The AD/CVD orders apply to certain chassis and subassemblies imported from China. Details about the scope are provided in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum, accessible via ACCESS (Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System) at https://access.trade.gov. Products Examined Commerce reviewed the following merchandise imported by AXN: Axle beams intended for chassis, regardless of whether AXN: Assembled them into axles using Chinese parts. Used U.S.-sourced parts to complete them. Combined both Chinese and U.S. parts. Imported them without further assembly. Slider boxes as imported. Landing gear sets as imported. Any other imported components that can be used on chassis, including those sold for final assembly into trailers, even if shipped individually. Preliminary Determination Commerce preliminarily finds: Axle beams used on chassis and assembled by AXN using any combination of Chinese or U.S. parts (scenarios 1[a]–1[c]) are covered by the AD/CVD orders. Slider boxes and landing gear sets imported by AXN are also covered. Other components like individual landing gear legs shipped alone and sold to trailer manufacturers are not classified as covered merchandise, even if intended for chassis use. Suspension of Liquidation Based on these findings, Commerce will direct CBP to take the following actions: Continue suspending liquidation of affected items already under suspension. For entries made on or after April 3, 2025, require AD/CVD cash deposits at applicable rates. For entries made before April 3, 2025, that have not been suspended yet, begin suspension and apply applicable AD/CVD cash deposit rates. These actions are specific to items imported by AXN. Public Comment Interested parties may submit written comments (case briefs) by February 9, 2026. Rebuttal briefs are due by February 16, 2026. Parties submitting briefs must include an executive summary of each issue, limited to 450 words, with citations included via footnotes. Requests for a hearing on the issues raised in the briefs must be submitted by February 9, 2026. Hearings, if requested, will be scheduled at a later date. Parties should confirm event details by phone two days before. Legal Authority This inquiry is conducted under 19 U.S.C. § 1517 (Section 517 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended) and 19 CFR 351.227. The full Preliminary Decision Memorandum is available at https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. Signed, Christopher Abbott Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations Performing the non-exclusive duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance Federal Register Citation: 91 FR 3119 (January 26, 2026) Document Number: 2026-01447 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Mobile Access Equipment and Subassemblies Thereof From the People’s Republic of China: Amended Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2022
U.S. Amends Duty Rate for Chinese Mobile Access Equipment Manufacturer Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On January 26, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released an amended final result in the countervailing duty review for mobile access equipment from China. The period of review covers January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022. This update affects Zhejiang Dingli Machinery Co., Ltd. and certain affiliated companies. The correction comes after a ministerial error was identified. The Coalition of American Manufacturers of Mobile Access Equipment submitted a timely error allegation on December 29, 2025. No other parties submitted comments. Commerce reviewed the claim and confirmed that a ministerial error existed. The error involved a benchmark for inland freight used in the subsidy rate calculation. The rate was incorrectly calculated using a per-kilogram per-kilometer value instead of a per-kilogram value. Commerce defines a ministerial error under section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930. Such an error includes arithmetic mistakes and clerical errors such as inaccurate copying and unintentional mistakes. As a result of the review, Commerce has amended the countervailable subsidy rate for Dingli. The final corrected subsidy rate is 33.10 percent ad valorem. This rate also applies to the following companies found to be cross-owned with Dingli: Zhejiang Green Power Machinery Co., Ltd. Zhejiang Shengda Fenghe Automotive Equipment Co., Ltd. Zhejiang Xieheng Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. Commerce intends to disclose all calculations and analysis related to the amended results within five days of publication. This is in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess countervailing duties based on the amended rate. Assessment instructions will be issued no earlier than 35 days after publication, unless a summons is filed with the U.S. Court of International Trade. If a summons is filed, CBP will delay liquidation of relevant entries for up to 90 days after publication. The amended cash deposit rate for Dingli takes effect as of January 26, 2026. Countervailing duties will be assessed on entries made on or after that date. The amended rate will remain active until further notice. The Department also reminds all parties under Administrative Protective Order (APO) to return or destroy proprietary information in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply with APO regulations is subject to sanction. The announcement was issued by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. He is performing the duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Monomers and Oligomers From Taiwan: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Final Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination
U.S. Finalizes Tariffs on Monomers and Oligomers from Taiwan Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a final determination in the countervailing duty (CVD) investigation of certain monomers and oligomers from Taiwan. The agency confirmed that producers and exporters in Taiwan received unfair government subsidies during the period of investigation. The investigation covered the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. This determination was published in the Federal Register on January 26, 2026. The companies investigated are Eternal Materials Co., Ltd. and Qualipoly Chemical Corporation. Commerce also issued findings for all other producers and exporters in Taiwan. Commerce found that critical circumstances exist for Eternal Materials, Qualipoly, and all other producers and exporters. This means that Commerce found a large increase in import volumes over a short period. As a result, earlier entries may be subject to duties. Commerce used adverse facts available (AFA) under sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930. This means that necessary data was not provided by the companies. Therefore, Commerce used facts that are less favorable to the producers. A subsidy rate of 103.43 percent ad valorem has been assigned to: Eternal Materials Co., Ltd. Qualipoly Chemical Corporation All other producers and exporters from Taiwan This rate is based on facts available with adverse inferences. The product covered includes specific monomers and oligomers made using acrylic or methacrylic acid. These are used in items like inks and coatings. The scope includes products with 20% or more by weight of in-scope content. The affected chemical products are listed with their Chemical Abstract Service (CAS) numbers. These include: Triethylene glycol dimethacrylate – CAS 109-16-0 1,6-hexanediol diacrylate – CAS 13048-33-4 Tripropylene glycol diacrylate – CAS 42978-66-5 Trimethylolpropane trimethacrylate – CAS 3290-92-4 Trimethylolpropane triacrylate – CAS 15625-89-5 Ethoxylated trimethylolpropane triacrylate – CAS 28961-43-5 Dipropylene glycol diacrylate – CAS 57472-68-1 Bisphenol-A-epichlorohydrin copolymer acrylate – CAS 55818-57-0 Commerce clarified that if any of these substances are found in blends with a total in-scope content of 20% or more by weight, the investigation applies. Downstream products such as inks or coatings are excluded from the scope. These products mainly fall under U.S. tariff codes: 2916.12.5050 2916.14.2050 3824.99.2900 3907.29.0000 3907.30.0000 They may also be entered under: 2916.12.1000 3824.99.9397 These classifications are provided only for customs purposes. The written description of the scope controls. On August 29, 2025, Commerce issued the preliminary affirmative determination. This was published in the Federal Register. On September 22, 2025, the agency issued its preliminary finding that critical circumstances existed. Due to a federal government shutdown, Commerce tolled deadlines in administrative proceedings by 47 days on November 14, 2025, and added 21 more days of tolling on November 24, 2025. As a result, the final deadline for this determination was January 15, 2026. Commerce is continuing the suspension of liquidation for subject goods entered on or after May 31, 2025, for producers involved in the critical circumstances finding. The agency had already suspended liquidation on entries as of August 29, 2025, following the preliminary determination. If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) makes a final affirmative injury determination, Commerce will issue a countervailing duty order. If the ITC issues a negative decision, then the investigation will end and cash deposits will be refunded. The ITC has 45 days from January 26, 2026, to announce its final determination. This Federal Register notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations at the Department of Commerce. The document reference number is 2026-01452. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From the Republic of Türkiye: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2023
U.S. Commerce Department Announces Preliminary Duty Rates on Turkish Steel Rebar Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Date: 2026-01-26 On January 26, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released the preliminary results of its countervailing duty (CVD) administrative review on steel concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) imports from the Republic of Türkiye. The review covers the period from January 1, 2023, through December 31, 2023. Commerce found that countervailable subsidies were provided to certain producers and exporters from Türkiye during the review period. These subsidies give companies financial advantages under U.S. trade law. The CVD review was conducted under the authority of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. Commerce analyzed whether the Turkish government provided financial contributions that offered specific benefits to rebar producers and exporters. Colakoglu Metalurji A.S. received a preliminary net countervailable subsidy rate of 1.84 percent ad valorem. Commerce also rescinded the review for two companies: Kaptan Demir Celik Endustrisi ve Ticaret A.S. and Kaptan Metal Dis Ticaret ve Nakliyat A.S. (collectively, Kaptan) The petitioner, Rebar Trade Action Coalition, withdrew its request for review of Kaptan within the deadline. Since no other parties requested a review for these companies, Commerce ended the review for Kaptan under 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1). Additionally, Commerce determined that Icdas Celik Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim Sanayi A.S. (Icdas) had no entries of subject merchandise during the review period. As a result, the review for Icdas was also rescinded under 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). All calculations and analysis used in these preliminary results are available to interested parties through the ACCESS system online at https://access.trade.gov. Commerce invites interested parties to submit case briefs on the preliminary results within 21 days after publication of this notice. Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in the case briefs, are due five days after that. All submissions must be completed through the ACCESS system by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the relevant due date. Briefs must include a table of contents and a table of authorities. Commerce requests that each issue covered in submitted briefs starts with an executive summary not exceeding 450 words, with relevant citations in footnotes. These summaries will be used when Commerce prepares its final report. Requests for a hearing must be filed electronically within 30 days after the publication date of this notice. Requests must include the requester’s name, address, phone number, number of participants (and note if any are foreign nationals), and a list of issues to discuss. If no summons is filed with the U.S. Court of International Trade, Commerce plans to instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess duties on entries covered by the final results. For companies for which the review is rescinded (Kaptan and Icdas), CBP will assess duties based on the rates in place at the time of entry. For Colakoglu Metalurji A.S., duties will be assessed at the rate determined in the final results of the review. When the review is complete and final results are published, CBP will adjust cash deposit rates for Colakoglu Metalurji A.S. Entries after the final results will be subject to the new rate, unless the final rate is zero or de minimis. Commerce aims to publish the final results within 120 days, unless the deadline is extended. Final results will include responses to arguments raised in case and rebuttal briefs. This notice is published under sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(4). For further details, refer to the Preliminary Decision Memorandum available online through ACCESS. Official Contact: Ajay Menon AD/CVD Operations, Office IX U.S. Department of Commerce Phone: (202) 482-0208 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Slag Pots From the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order and Countervailing Duty Order
U.S. Issues Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Slag Pots from China Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On January 26, 2026, the United States Department of Commerce published antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on slag pots imported from the People’s Republic of China. Final determinations were made by both the U.S. Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The Department of Commerce found that slag pots from China were being sold in the United States at less than fair value. The Department also found that the Chinese government was providing unfair subsidies to producers and exporters of slag pots. The ITC determined that these dumped and subsidized imports caused injury to the domestic U.S. industry. As a result, duty orders were issued. The Department of Commerce instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect antidumping duties. These duties apply to slag pots from China entered or withdrawn for consumption on or after June 17, 2025. These dates cover the period starting from the publication of the Department’s Preliminary Determination through the resumption date after the provisional measures lapsed and until the date of the ITC’s final determination. The Department of Commerce plans to continue the suspension of liquidation of unliquidated entries of slag pots from China. CBP will require importers to deposit cash equal to the dumping margin indicated in the final determination. For the CVD order, countervailing duties will apply to entries made on or after April 3, 2025, the publication date of the Preliminary CVD Determination. Provisional measures expired on July 31, 2025. Therefore, entries made between August 1, 2025, and the day before the ITC’s final determination publication will not be subject to countervailing duties. CBP is instructed to suspend liquidation again beginning with the date of publication of the ITC’s final injury determination. Slag pots covered by these orders include those with a nominal capacity between 65 cubic feet and 1200 cubic feet. These are usually large curved containers used to hold molten slag. They can be cast or fabricated and may include heat treatments or ceramic coatings. They often have legs or stands and pivoting hooks or brackets used to move them safely. All attachments are also covered whether or not they are attached at the time of entry. Slag pots are within the scope of the order whether finished or unfinished, and whether shipped assembled or unassembled. Slag pots processed or assembled in another country but originally cast or forged in China are included. Products may be classified under several Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS) codes, including 7309.00.0090 and 8454.20.0080. Relevant components may also enter under other tariff codes such as 7316.00.0000, 7325.10.0080, 7325.99.1000, 7325.99.5000, and 7326.19.0080. The written description in the orders decides what is covered. Commerce has established annual inquiry service lists for these orders. Interested parties must add themselves within 30 days following the order’s publication using the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Electronic Service System (ACCESS) at https://access.trade.gov. Petitioners and foreign governments need to submit an entry of appearance after this notice. They will remain on the service list in future years automatically. This notice officially establishes the AD and CVD orders for slag pots from China. The enforcement is carried out under sections 706(a) and 736(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930. For further updates, interested parties can refer to the active order list at https://enforcement.trade.gov/stats/iastats1.html. Contacts for this case are George McMahon at (202) 482-1167 for AD matters, and Samuel Brummitt at (202) 482-7851 for CVD matters. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Scope Rulings
U.S. Department of Commerce Issues Latest Scope Rulings – Q3 2025 Estimated reading time: 3–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has published a list of scope rulings finalized between July 1, 2025, and September 30, 2025. These rulings determine whether certain imports are subject to existing antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders. This list was officially released on January 26, 2026. Final Scope Rulings India Large Diameter Welded Pipe from India (A-533-881 and C-533-882) Shawcor Pipe Protection Acquisition Corp. requested a ruling. The company imports pipes made from Grade L450 steel with an 18-inch outside diameter. The Department found the products are within the scope of the AD/CVD orders. These pipes are covered because they are larger than 16 inches in diameter and are suitable for moving oil or gas. Ruling date: September 8, 2025. People’s Republic of China Aluminum Extrusions from China (A-570-967 and C-570-968) IPG Photonics Corporation requested a ruling for finished heat sinks. The Department reviewed whether these aluminum extrusions should be excluded as finished heat sinks. To qualify for exclusion, the product must be made from aluminum extrusions, be designed to meet specific thermal requirements, and be tested (fully or not individually) to meet those thermal needs. Commerce found IPG’s products do not meet these conditions. Ruling date: August 27, 2025. Fresh Garlic from China (A-570-831) International Golden Foods, Inc. (IGF) requested a ruling for garlic cloves in brine. The AD order includes all garlic unless it is preserved by added ingredients. IGF’s garlic was preserved with other ingredients, so it is excluded from the scope. Ruling date: August 29, 2025. Mattresses from China (A-570-092) Point A Technologies, Inc. submitted a request for memory foam mattresses for hospital beds made by Zhongshan Getop Medical and Healthcare Equipment Co., Ltd. These mattresses measure 34.5” x 77.5” x 5.9”. The Department found them to be within the scope of the order due to these dimensions being close to those listed for adult mattresses in the AD order. Ruling date: August 1, 2025. Wooden Cabinets and Vanities from China (A-570-106 and C-570-107) RST Brands, LLC requested a ruling for Flow Wall cabinets. The Department found these cabinets fall under the scope of the orders. The cabinets match the materials and construction described in the AD/CVD orders and use a bracket and rail system for fixed installation. Ruling date: August 25, 2025. Thailand Truck and Bus Tires from Thailand (A-549-848) Yokohama TWS North America, Inc. requested a ruling for its TR-900 Series truck tires. The scope includes tires that: – Bear a “TR” or “HC” suffix in size. – Have a “DOT” symbol at importation. Yokohama’s tires have a “TR” marking for tread pattern (not size), no “DOT” symbol at import, and are not sized for trucks or buses. The Commerce Department concluded these tires are not subject to the AD/CVD orders. Ruling date: July 22, 2025. Preliminary Scope Determinations Mexico Mattresses from Mexico (A-201-859) Bob Barker Company Inc. requested a ruling for mattresses assembled in Mexico using U.S.-origin mattress cores. The Department’s preliminary decision is that these products are not covered by the AD order. The U.S.-origin cores are not substantially changed during assembly and the product country of origin remains the United States. Ruling date: September 26, 2025. China Aluminum Extrusions from China (A-570-967 and C-570-968) HTM MBS LLC requested a ruling for wall standoffs and components. The Department preliminarily found that the items do not qualify under the finished merchandise or finished goods kit exclusions. Since they consist of extruded aluminum parts without further qualifying features, they are included in the scope of the orders. Ruling date: August 22, 2025. Public Notice Interested parties are welcome to comment on this scope ruling list. Comments should be sent to the Deputy Assistant Secretary for AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, by email at the address provided in the Federal Register notice. Issued under 19 CFR 351.225(o). Dated: 2026-01-21 Signed: Scot Fullerton Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations Federal Register Document Number: 2026-01455 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest
U.S. International Trade Commission Investigates Electric Unicycles Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On January 21, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) received a filing from Inventist, Inc. and Alien Technology Group, Inc., who also do business as Alien Rides. The complaint involves certain gyro-stabilized electric unicycles, their parts, and other products containing these components. The complaint alleges violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The violations involve the import, sale for import, and sales inside the United States, of electric unicycle products that allegedly infringe on the complainants’ rights. The respondents named in the complaint are companies from China: Guangzhou Veteran Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. (LeaperKim) Dong Guan BEGODE Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd. (BEGODE) Inmotion Technologies Co., Ltd. (Inmotion) Shenzhen King Song Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd. (Kingsong) Guangzhou JiDongTai Intelligent Equipment Co., Ltd. (Nosfet) The complainants request the Commission to issue: A general exclusion order Or a limited exclusion order Cease and desist orders A bond issuing requirement on the allegedly infringing goods during the 60-day Presidential review period per 19 U.S.C. 1337(j) The Commission is asking for public comments about the case. Any interested parties, government agencies, and the public are invited to submit comments. These comments should speak to whether any trade restrictions requested would affect: Public health and welfare in the U.S. Competitive conditions in the U.S. economy U.S. production of similar or competitive products Consumer access to the products Specifically, the Commission is asking for comments that: Explain how the products are used in the U.S. Discuss any safety, health, or welfare concerns if the products were restricted Identify U.S.-made options that can replace these products Say whether the complainants or others can supply replacement products in a timely way Explain how a ban would affect U.S. consumers Written public interest comments must be submitted no later than eight calendar days after this notice’s publication in the Federal Register, which was January 26, 2026. Further comments will be accepted after the Commission issues its final initial determination. Replies to others’ submissions must be filed within three calendar days after the first submission deadline. All submissions: Must be filed electronically Must refer to Docket No. 3877 on the cover or first page Cannot exceed five pages including attachments Must be submitted through the Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov Paper submissions will not be accepted at this time. Those seeking confidential treatment for their documents must explain why the Commission should keep the material private, per 19 CFR 201.6. Confidential information may be used by Commission employees or contractors to support investigations and reviews. Public versions of submissions will be available through EDIS. This investigation moves forward under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The current procedures follow Commission rules in 19 CFR 201.10 and 210.8(c). For questions, contact Lisa R. Barton, Secretary to the Commission, at (202) 205-2000, or access EDIS online at https://edis.usitc.gov. Issued: January 21, 2026 By order of the Commission. Lisa Barton Secretary to the Commission [Federal Register Document No. 2026-01333] Filed January 23, 2026 Billing Code 7020-02-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Fresh Tomatoes From Mexico; Institution and Scheduling of Review Investigation Concerning the Commission’s Affirmative Determination in Investigation No. 731-TA-747 (Final), Fresh Tomatoes From Mexico
U.S. Launches Review on Fresh Tomato Imports from Mexico Estimated reading time: 6–9 minutes Date: 2026-01-26 The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) announced on January 21, 2026, that it will begin a review of its earlier decision in Investigation No. 731-TA-747 (Final), regarding fresh tomatoes from Mexico. This review is being conducted under Section 751(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(b)). The purpose is to determine if removing the antidumping duty order on imports of fresh tomatoes from Mexico would harm the U.S. industry again. Fresh tomatoes from Mexico are listed under heading 0702.00 of the U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule. Background The original investigation started on April 1, 1996. The complaint was filed by several U.S. tomato associations. They believed that low-priced Mexican tomatoes were hurting U.S. growers. A suspension agreement was reached with Mexican exporters on October 28, 1996. This paused the legal investigation as the Mexican companies agreed to change pricing practices. Several times over the years, the agreement was ended and resumed. Investigations were restarted and then suspended following new agreements. The action repeated in 2002, 2008, 2013, and 2019. In 2019, Commerce and the ITC both made affirmative decisions, agreeing that Mexican imports were causing harm. However, because a new suspension agreement was signed on September 19, 2019, no antidumping duty was placed. Most recently, the 2019 agreement was terminated on July 14, 2025. An official antidumping duty order was then issued. Request for Review On May 9, 2025, three Mexican producers—Bioparques de Occidente, Agricola La Primavera, and Kaliroy Fresh—asked the Commission to review its 2019 decision. They said the market has changed since then. These groups claimed there have been shifts in U.S. demand and in growing techniques. U.S. customers now prefer different types of tomatoes. U.S. and Canadian growers have invested heavily in greenhouse farming, making the market more diverse. Also, U.S. producers have invested in growing facilities in Mexico to support year-round demand. On June 18, 2025, the ITC published a notice in the Federal Register, asking for public comments. Six submissions supported opening a review. They included industry groups from both Mexico and the U.S., as well as Canadian companies. The Florida Tomato Exchange opposed the review. After reviewing the comments, the ITC decided that there is enough evidence of changed market conditions to begin a formal review. Commission Votes Chair Karpel opposed starting the review, saying the changes were not enough. Commissioner Kearns supported the review. Commissioner Johanson did not vote. By rule, a tied vote among participating Commissioners is enough to allow a review to proceed. Case Schedule Key dates for the investigation are now set: The staff report (nonpublic version) will be released on April 29, 2026. A public version will be released later. A hearing will take place on May 19, 2026. Requests to appear at the hearing must be filed by May 14, 2026. A prehearing conference will be held on May 15, 2026. Prehearing briefs are due May 8, 2026. Posthearing briefs are due May 28, 2026. Final party comments on all evidence are due June 25, 2026. Hearing and Filings All filings must be made electronically through the ITC’s EDIS system: https://edis.usitc.gov. No paper filings will be accepted. Parties may request to testify remotely. These requests must be submitted with the hearing request and must explain why the witness cannot appear in person. Business proprietary information will only be shared with parties granted access under an administrative protective order. Applications must be submitted at least 21 days before the hearing. Conclusion The ITC will review the potential impacts of lifting current duties on Mexican fresh tomatoes. This decision could affect trade, prices, and competition in the U.S. tomato market. The outcome depends on whether the market changes raised by the Mexican parties are supported by data and justify changing the current policy. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts From Canada and India; Institution of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations and Scheduling of Preliminary Phase Investigations
U.S. Launches Trade Investigations on Citric Acid Imports from Canada and India Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On January 21, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) began new investigations into imports of citric acid and certain citrate salts from Canada and India. These chemicals are used in food, pharmaceuticals, and cleaning products. The case includes both antidumping and countervailing duty investigations. The Commission is investigating if these products are being sold in the U.S. at unfairly low prices and if the governments of Canada and India are providing illegal subsidies. These imports fall under U.S. tariff subheadings 2918.14.00, 2918.15.10, 2918.15.50, and 3824.99.93 on the Harmonized Tariff Schedule. The investigations were started after petitions were filed by three U.S.-based companies: Archer-Daniels-Midland Company, Decatur, IL Cargill, Incorporated, Wayzata, MN Primary Products Ingredients Americas LLC, Schaumburg, IL The Commission must make a preliminary decision by March 9, 2026. Its findings will then be sent to the U.S. Department of Commerce by March 16, 2026. The investigation is being carried out under Sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671b(a) and 1673b(a)). The public may participate under the Commission’s rules. Any person or group wishing to take part must file an entry of appearance no later than seven days after the notice is published in the Federal Register. Industrial users and consumer organizations may also join the investigation as parties. A separate public service list will be created. It will include the names and contact information for all parties to the investigation. Parties approved under the Administrative Protective Order (APO) will get access to business proprietary information (BPI). These requests must be submitted within seven days of publication of the notice. A staff conference will take place on February 11, 2026, starting at 9:30 a.m. Requests to appear at this conference must be emailed by noon on February 9, 2026. The email must include the email contacts for all intended participants. Parties who want to give written input must submit briefs by 5:15 p.m. on February 17, 2026. Written testimony and related materials for the conference must be submitted no later than 4:00 p.m. on February 10, 2026. All submissions must follow USITC Rules (sections 201.6, 201.8, 207.3, and 207.7) and must be made electronically using the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. Paper filings are not accepted at this time. Anyone submitting materials must also share them with other parties and submit a certificate of service. All information submitted to the Commission must be certified as accurate and complete. Parties acknowledge that their information may be used by U.S. agency personnel for official investigations or cybersecurity reviews. These actions are authorized under Title VII of the Tariff Act of 1930. The notice was issued on January 22, 2026, by Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. Public records for this case can be viewed at https://edis.usitc.gov. Additional information is available at https://www.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-01-23
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-01-23 1) Executive Summary Seven trade-related events are covered in today’s update. The key authorities involved include the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration (DOC/ITA). The main policy mechanisms reported are Section 337 investigations and remedies, antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders and reviews, continuation of duty orders, and an upcoming DOC advisory meeting. The events include final determinations, new investigations, and procedural notices involving Chinese-origin goods such as oil vaporizing devices, lightweight thermal paper, and torsion springs. 2) Updates by Authority INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (ITC) Oil Vaporizing Devices — Section 337 Violation (Final Determination) The ITC found a violation of Section 337 in its investigation of certain oil vaporizing devices, components, and products containing the same. The Commission issued a limited exclusion order (LEO) prohibiting unlicensed entry of infringing devices produced or imported by ALD Group Limited and other respondents, along with cease and desist orders (CDOs) against two respondents. The investigation is terminated. Authority: U.S. International Trade Commission Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1392; associated patents Nos. 11,369,756; 11,766,527; 11,369,757; 11,759,580 Key date: Commission vote on January 20, 2026 Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-oil-vaporizing-devices-components-thereof-and-products-containing-the-same-notice-of-the-commissions-final-determination-finding-a-violation-of-section-337-issuance-of-a-limited-exclusion/ Video-Capable Electronic Devices — Section 337 Investigation (Notice of Institution) The ITC has instituted a Section 337 investigation following a complaint by InterDigital, Inc. and InterDigital VC Holdings, Inc. The complaint alleges that Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Services, LLC import and sell infringing video-capable electronics in violation of five listed patents. The complainants seek a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. Authority: U.S. International Trade Commission Policy Type: ITC_337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1481 Key date: Institution ordered January 20, 2026 Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/certain-video-capable-electronic-devices-notice-of-institution-of-investigation/ DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE (INTERNATIONAL TRADE ADMINISTRATION) Lightweight Thermal Paper — Continuation of AD/CVD Orders (Final Notice) Commerce continued the AD and CVD orders on lightweight thermal paper from the People’s Republic of China after determinations by both Commerce and the ITC that revocation would likely result in resumed dumping, subsidization, and material injury. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD and CVD deposits at the existing rates. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Key identifier: Orders A-570-920 and C-570-921 Key date: Effective January 8, 2026 Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/lightweight-thermal-paper-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-continuation-of-antidumping-duty-and-countervailing-duty-orders/ Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs — AD and CVD Orders (Final Issuance) Following affirmative final determinations by Commerce and the ITC, AD and CVD orders were issued on overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from China. The orders direct suspension of liquidation and cash deposit collection for subject merchandise. The ITC found material injury but no critical circumstances for the imports. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY China Indicator: EXPLICIT Key identifiers: A-570-186, C-570-187 Key date: Applicable January 23, 2026 Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/overhead-door-counterbalance-torsion-springs-from-the-peoples-republic-of-china-antidumping-duty-order-and-countervailing-duty-order/ Utility Scale Wind Towers from Korea — AD Administrative Review (Preliminary Results) Commerce preliminarily determined that sales of utility scale wind towers from Korea were made at less than normal value during the 2023–2024 period of review. The weighted-average dumping margin for Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd. was 4.99%. The review was rescinded in part for eight other companies. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Key identifiers: A-580-902 Key date: Applicable January 23, 2026 Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/utility-scale-wind-towers-from-the-republic-of-korea-preliminary-results-and-rescission-in-part-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ Organic Soybean Meal from India — AD Administrative Review (Final Results) Commerce issued final results of its administrative review, determining that Tejawat Organic Foods sold organic soybean meal from India at prices below normal value during the period May 1, 2023 – April 30, 2024. The weighted average dumping margin is 18.80%. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD_CVD Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Key identifier: A-533-901 Key date: Applicable January 23, 2026 Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/organic-soybean-meal-from-india-final-results-of-antidumping-duty-administrative-review-2023-2024/ Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee — Public Meeting Notice The DOC’s Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee will hold a virtual public meeting on February 3, 2026, to discuss issues related to U.S. environmental technology exports and competitiveness. Registration and public comment instructions are provided in the notice. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: PROCEDURAL_NOTICE Event Type: POLICY_NOTICE Key date: Meeting scheduled February 3, 2026 Source: https://lawyerfanzhang.com/environmental-technologies-trade-advisory-committee/ 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The ITC issued a limited exclusion and cease-and-desist orders in the Section 337 case concerning oil vaporizing devices involving Chinese firms. Commerce and the ITC jointly reaffirmed existing AD/CVD orders on lightweight thermal paper from China. New AD and CVD orders were imposed on Chinese overhead door torsion springs, confirming final injury findings. The ITC opened a new Section 337 investigation involving InterDigital’s video-capable device patents against Amazon. Commerce scheduled a virtual public meeting of the Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee for February 3, 2026. 4) Full Source Links (Index) Oil Vaporizing Devices — Section 337 Violation Video-Capable Electronic Devices — Investigation Notice Lightweight Thermal Paper — Continuation of AD/CVD Orders Overhead Door Springs — AD/CVD Orders Utility Scale Wind Towers — Preliminary Review Results Organic Soybean Meal — Final Review Results Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee — Meeting Notice 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee
Federal Government Announces Public Meeting on U.S. Environmental Exports Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced a public meeting of the Environmental Technologies Trade Advisory Committee (ETTAC). The meeting will take place on Tuesday, February 3, 2026. It will run from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m. EST, then resume from 1:30 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. EST. The meeting will be held virtually. The public is invited to attend. To participate, individuals must register online at https://www.trade.gov/ettac. The deadline to register is Tuesday, January 27, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. EST. Requests to speak during the meeting, to use auxiliary aids such as sign language interpretation, or to submit written comments before the meeting, must also be sent by the January 27 deadline. Written comments can be emailed to Ms. Megan Hyndman at the Office of Energy & Environmental Industries. Her contact information is listed in the official meeting notice. The meeting is open to everyone, including people with disabilities. Attendees needing special help or tools to access the event should request them by January 27, 2026. After this date, the committee may not be able to meet the request. The ETTAC is a federal advisory group. Its goal is to improve U.S. exports of environmental technology goods and services. The committee gives advice to the Environmental Trade Promotion Working Group. This group is part of the government’s Trade Promotion Coordinating Committee. The ETTAC was created under the Export Enhancement Act of 1988. It was most recently re-chartered through August 6, 2026. This will be the committee’s eighth meeting during the current charter term. At the meeting, members will talk about problems U.S. environmental businesses face. They will also discuss possible recommendations and hear talks from government officials. The agenda for the meeting will be available one week before the event. Those who want the agenda should contact Designated Federal Officer Megan Hyndman. Written comments related to the committee can be sent any time. However, to be reviewed during the upcoming meeting, comments must be submitted by January 27, 2026, at 5:00 p.m. EST. Meeting minutes and other related materials will be available within 30 days of the meeting. For more details, members of the public can call Megan Hyndman at 202-482-1297. The Federal Register reference number for this meeting notice is 2026-01199. This notice was signed by Man K. Cho, Deputy Director, Office of Energy and Environmental Industries, on January 20, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Organic Soybean Meal From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Commerce Department Issues Final Results in Review of Indian Organic Soybean Meal Imports Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On January 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on organic soybean meal imported from India. The review covers the period from May 1, 2023, through April 30, 2024. The sole exporter/producer examined in this review was Tejawat Organic Foods. Commerce determined that Tejawat made sales in the United States at prices below the normal value. Tejawat received a final estimated weighted-average dumping margin of 18.80 percent. These findings are based on the application of adverse facts available (AFA) under sections 776(a) and (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. Commerce did not make any changes to the preliminary results published on July 11, 2025. This decision was reached after reviewing and addressing all issues raised by interested parties. Details are found in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The memorandum includes discussion of two key issues: Comment 1: Whether Commerce should continue applying total AFA to Tejawat. Comment 2: Whether Commerce should apply a higher AFA rate. No new calculations were disclosed because the final results continue to rely solely on AFA. Commerce conducted the review under section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will assess duties on all applicable entries based on the final results. Commerce intends to send assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after publication of this notice in the Federal Register. If a legal challenge is filed, liquidation of relevant entries may be delayed for up to 90 days to allow time for any parties to request an injunction. New cash deposit rates are now in effect for all shipments of organic soybean meal from India entered on or after January 23, 2026: Tejawat Organic Foods must post a deposit equal to the 18.80 percent dumping margin. For firms not covered in this review but already covered in a prior completed segment, the deposit rate remains the previously determined rate. If the exporter is new but the producer was already reviewed, the rate for the producer applies. For all other producers and exporters, the deposit rate remains 3.07 percent, which was set in the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation. Importers are reminded that under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2), they must file certificates confirming that they did not receive reimbursements for antidumping duties. Failing to do so could result in Commerce assuming reimbursement occurred and doubling the duty amount. Parties subject to an Administrative Protective Order (APO) are also reminded to comply with regulations and return or destroy proprietary information as required under 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). The final results are issued under sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Tariff Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). This information is publicly available via the Federal Register and the Enforcement & Compliance ACCESS system. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Utility Scale Wind Towers From the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results and Rescission, in Part, of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
U.S. Preliminarily Finds Wind Towers From South Korea Sold Below Fair Market Value Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On January 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced preliminary results in the 2023–2024 antidumping duty administrative review of utility scale wind towers imported from the Republic of Korea. The review covers the period from August 1, 2023, to July 31, 2024. Commerce found that one company, Dongkuk S&C Co., Ltd., sold utility scale wind towers in the United States at prices below normal value. The preliminary weighted-average dumping margin for Dongkuk is 4.99 percent. This means Dongkuk may face additional import duties of 4.99 percent when the final results are issued. Commerce is also rescinding the review for eight South Korean companies. These companies did not have entries of wind towers in the United States during the review period. Because no merchandise was imported from them during the review period, no further review will take place for these firms. The eight companies removed from the review are: CS Wind Corporation Enercon Korea Inc. Hyosung Heavy Industries Nordex SE Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy Limited Unison Co., Ltd. Vestas Korea Wind Technology Ltd. Win&P., Ltd. Commerce used data reported by Dongkuk to calculate the dumping margin. They used export price methods based on U.S. law – Sections 751(a), 772, and 773 of the Tariff Act of 1930. All information used to reach these results is available in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The document can be found online at https://access.trade.gov. Parties affected by this decision can submit case briefs no later than 21 days after this notice is published. Rebuttal briefs may be filed five days later. Hearings, if requested, must be asked for within 30 days of publication. Commerce stated that the final results will be released no later than 120 days after the publication of this preliminary notice. Commerce intends to assess duties on affected entries after the final results are published. If the final margin remains above 0.50 percent, CBP will collect duties using the calculated margin. If the margin is below 0.50 percent, no duties will be collected. The cash deposit rate for Dongkuk will also change once final results are entered. For exporters not covered in this review, the previously assigned rates will continue to apply. The all-others dumping margin from the original investigation remains at 5.41 percent. Commerce reminds importers to submit certificates about any reimbursements of duties. Failure to do so could result in penalties, including double duties. This review is part of ongoing enforcement of the Antidumping Duty Order issued in August 2020, originally published in 85 FR 52546. The review is conducted under the authority of the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration, Enforcement and Compliance office. For further information, contact Anne Entz at the Commerce Department by phone at (202) 482-3845. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Overhead Door Counterbalance Torsion Springs From the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order and Countervailing Duty Order
U.S. Issues Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders on Overhead Door Springs from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On January 23, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce issued an antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) order on overhead door counterbalance torsion springs from China. This follows final affirmative determinations by both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC concluded on September 30, 2025, that U.S. industry is being harmed by these imports. The AD and CVD duties address sales at less than fair value and illegal subsidies given to Chinese manufacturers. The merchandise covered includes steel torsion springs used in overhead doors such as garage doors and industrial rolling doors. These springs must have a coil inside diameter between 15.8 mm and 304.8 mm, a wire diameter between 2.5 mm and 20.4 mm, and a length of at least 127 mm. Springs with attached hardware such as cones or fittings, or those entered with such fittings on the invoice, are also covered. Kits containing these springs and fittings are included in the scope. Springs that have undergone further processing in a third country, such as cutting or adding fittings, are also included if they meet the scope definition. Excluded products are leaf springs, disc springs, extension springs, compression springs, and spiral springs. Covered imports are classified under HTSUS 7320.20.5020, 7320.20.5045, and 7320.20.5060. They may also fall under HTSUS 8412.90.9085, 8412.80.1000, and 7308.90.9590, depending on configuration. Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to collect duties equal to the amount by which the normal value exceeds the U.S. price. Duties on affected imports will apply to unliquidated entries from June 2, 2025, onward. Entries between the end of provisional measures and the ITC’s injury determination will not be subject to duties. Critical circumstances were not found. Commerce will refund cash deposits for affected entries made between March 4, 2025, and June 2, 2025. Suspension of liquidation resumes as of January 23, 2026, and CBP will again collect cash deposits. For countervailing duties, CBP will assess duties on affected Chinese imports entered from April 3, 2025, onward. CBP will not assess duties on entries from August 1, 2025, to the day before January 23, 2026, when provisional measures expired. The final cash deposit rates for both AD and CVD cases are those published on August 15, 2025. Commerce has created an Annual Inquiry Service List (AISL) through its ACCESS system. Interested parties must file entries of appearance within 30 days of the order’s publication. Petitioners and the Government of China only need to file once and will be automatically added in future years. This notice was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations. For more information, contact Jacob Keller at (202) 482-4849 or Laurel Smalley at (202) 482-3456. The full scope description and detailed product criteria are included in the appendix to the Federal Register notice. The AD and CVD orders are now in effect. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Lightweight Thermal Paper From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty and Countervailing Duty Orders
U.S. Government Keeps Tariffs on Lightweight Thermal Paper from China Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Published: 2026-01-23 The U.S. Department of Commerce has announced the continuation of the antidumping duty (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on lightweight thermal paper from the People’s Republic of China. The action follows findings by both the Department of Commerce and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). They determined that ending the orders would likely lead to renewed dumping, unfair subsidies, and harm to American industry. The AD and CVD orders were first published on November 24, 2008. This current update is the result of the third five-year “sunset” review under section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930. On June 2, 2025, both the Department of Commerce and the ITC began the third sunset review of the orders. The purpose of the review was to see if ending the orders would affect U.S. industries. Commerce concluded that revoking the orders would likely lead to more dumping and subsidies. Commerce shared the data with the ITC. On January 8, 2026, the ITC made its final determination. It agreed that removing the tariffs would likely cause continued harm to a U.S. industry. Effective January 8, 2026, the AD and CVD orders remain in place. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue collecting cash deposits on imports of affected paper. Lightweight thermal paper is often used in ATM receipts, gas pump receipts, and retail store receipts. The product under review includes thermal paper with a basis weight of 70 grams per square meter or less, even with a 4.0 g/m² tolerance. It may have base coats, top coats, or thermal coatings on one or both sides. It may come in any shape or size, with or without adhesive backing. The thermal paper is classified under several Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTSUS) codes, including: 3703.10.60 4811.59.20 4811.90.8040 4811.90.9090 4820.10.20 4823.40.00 4811.90.8030 4811.90.8050 4811.90.9030 4811.90.9050 Even though HTSUS codes are listed, the full written description of the order defines the scope. Jumbo rolls as well as converted rolls are both covered. Rolls of all sizes, or thermal paper in any form, are affected by the order. The Department of Commerce states that the next five-year review will be started no later than 30 days before the fifth anniversary of the ITC’s latest ruling. This Federal Register notice is published in accordance with sections 751(c), 751(d)(2), and 777(i) of the Tariff Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). The notice serves as a reminder about Administrative Protective Orders. All parties must return or destroy proprietary information, or convert it to a judicial protective order, under 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). For more information, contact Matthew Eiss at the U.S. Department of Commerce, (202) 482-5675. Signed, Christopher Abbott Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations Performing duties of Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance Federal Register Document Number: 2026-01283 Filed: January 22, 2026 Billing Code: 3510-DS-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Video-Capable Electronic Devices; Notice of Institution of Investigation
USITC Opens Investigation Into Certain Video-Capable Devices from Amazon Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On January 20, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced that it has begun an investigation under Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The investigation is titled “Certain Video-Capable Electronic Devices” (Investigation No. 337-TA-1481). The case is based on a complaint filed on December 18, 2025, by InterDigital, Inc. and InterDigital VC Holdings, Inc., both based in Wilmington, Delaware. A supplemental letter was filed on January 6, 2026. The complaint alleges that Amazon.com, Inc. and Amazon.com Services, LLC are importing and selling certain video-capable electronic devices that infringe on several U.S. patents. These include: U.S. Patent No. 10,741,211 U.S. Patent No. 9,747,674 U.S. Patent No. 8,363,724 U.S. Patent No. 8,681,855 U.S. Patent No. 11,917,146 The USITC will investigate if the devices infringe on claims listed in these patents. The specific claims in question are: Claims 1, 2, 12, 14 of the ’211 patent Claims 1, 4, 10, 15 of the ’674 patent Claims 39, 41, 43, 47, 48, 50, 53, 54, 56, 57, 59, 61, 65, 66, 68, 71, 72, 74 of the ’724 patent Claims 13, 16, 19, 22 of the ’855 patent Claims 1–3, 7–9, 13, 14, 17, 18 of the ’146 patent The USITC will also determine whether an industry exists or is in the process of being established in the U.S. as required by law. The products in question are described as: Video-capable streaming devices Televisions Tablet computers Smart displays The formal respondents in this matter are: Amazon.com, Inc., 410 Terry Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109 Amazon.com Services, LLC, 410 Terry Avenue North, Seattle, WA 98109 The complainants are: InterDigital, Inc., 200 Bellevue Parkway, Suite 300, Wilmington, DE 19809 InterDigital VC Holdings, Inc., 200 Bellevue Parkway, Suite 300, Wilmington, DE 19809 The Chief Administrative Law Judge will assign a presiding judge for this case. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as a party in this investigation. Under USITC rules, Amazon must respond to the complaint and the notice of investigation within 20 days of being served. Any extension will only be allowed for good cause. If Amazon fails to respond in time, the law judge and Commission may consider the facts to be as stated in the complaint. This could result in the issuing of a limited exclusion order, a cease and desist order, or both. The public version of the complaint is available at https://edis.usitc.gov. For questions, contact Susan Orndoff, Docket Services Division, USITC, at (202) 205-1802. Issued by order of the Commission on January 20, 2026. Lisa BartonSecretary to the Commission Federal Register Document Number: 2026-01227Billing Code: 7020-02-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Oil Vaporizing Devices, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Notice of the Commission’s Final Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337; Issuance of a Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders; Termination of the Investigation
U.S. ITC Finds Patent Violation in Oil Vaporizing Devices Case; Issues Orders Against STIIIZY and ALD Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On January 23, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) published its final determination in Investigation No. 337-TA-1392. The case involves oil vaporizing devices, their parts, and products containing these parts. The Commission found violations of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The violations relate to the unlicensed importation and sale of oil vaporizing products that infringe several U.S. patents. The Commission issued a Limited Exclusion Order (LEO). This order blocks unlicensed entry of the infringing products made or imported by the companies named in the complaint. The Commission also issued Cease and Desist Orders (CDOs) against STIIIZY. The investigation began on March 6, 2024. The complaint was filed by the patent holder. It alleged that STIIIZY IP LLC (formerly STIIIZY, LLC), STIIIZY, Inc. (doing business as Shryne Group Inc.), ALD Group Limited, and ALD Hong Kong Holdings imported and sold products that violated four patents: U.S. Patent No. 11,369,756 (“the ‘756 patent”) U.S. Patent No. 11,766,527 (“the ‘527 patent”) U.S. Patent No. 11,369,757 (“the ‘757 patent”) U.S. Patent No. 11,759,580 (“the ‘580 patent”) Initially, the ALJ found that the STIIIZY and ALD products infringed many of the patented claims. However, the ALJ concluded that the complainant failed to meet the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement. The Commission reviewed and reversed several of the ALJ’s findings. It ruled that the complainant met both the technical and economic parts of the domestic industry requirement. A key Commission finding was that pre-patent issuance investments can be counted under Section 337(a)(3), as long as those investments were related to the patented products. The products named as infringing include: STIIIZY-LIIIL STIIIZY-1G(C) STIIIZY-ORIG-1 STIIIZY-AIO FLARE(C) FLARE(V) ROVE(C) ROVE(V) STIIIZY-1G-REDESIGN(C) STIIIZY-ORIG-1G-REDESIGN STIIIZY-AIO-REDESIGN Several product redesigns by STIIIZY and ALD were also found to infringe under the doctrine of equivalents. The Commission confirmed that none of the patents were found invalid under Sections 102, 103, or 112 of Title 35 of the U.S. Code. Public comments were received during the review process, including submissions from Professor William J. McNichol, Jr. of Rutgers Law School. Following review, the Commission found that public interest factors did not weigh against issuing the LEO and CDOs. It also set a bond of 100% of the value of the infringing imports during the 60-day Presidential review period. The investigation is now closed. The Commission’s decision was based on the full record, including the initial determination, petitions for review, and public submissions. For more details, the official documentation can be accessed through the Commission’s website at www.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-01-22
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-01-22 1) Executive Summary Today’s daily briefing covers seven trade remedy updates issued by U.S. authorities on January 22, 2026. The principal agencies involved are the U.S. Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration (ITA) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The measures include antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) determinations, as well as a Section 337 enforcement proceeding. The covered products include polypropylene corrugated boxes, hardwood and decorative plywood, fiberglass door panels, and L-lysine. Policy instruments addressed today consist of affirmative preliminary and final determinations, subsidy calculations, cash deposit requirements, and a formal ITC enforcement action. 2) Updates by Authority INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION (ITC – U.S. International Trade Commission) Pre-Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair — Section 337 Enforcement Proceeding (Institution) The ITC has instituted a formal enforcement proceeding regarding compliance with a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders issued on September 29, 2025, in the investigation Certain Pre-Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair and Packaging Therefor. The action concerns alleged violations by Vivace Inc. of Port Washington, NY, a defaulting respondent, relating to potential continued importation or sale of infringing goods. Authority: U.S. International Trade Commission Policy Type: ITC Section 337 Event Type: TRADE_REMEDY Key identifiers: Investigation No. 337-TA-1415 (Enforcement) Key date: ITC vote January 20, 2026 China Indicator: None stated Source: ITC Notice of Institution of Formal Enforcement Proceeding DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE – INTERNATIONAL TRADE ADMINISTRATION Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes — Countervailing Duty (Final Affirmative Determination) Commerce determined that countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters of polypropylene corrugated boxes from China. The final subsidy rate for all exporters was set at 62.27 percent ad valorem, based on adverse facts available due to non-cooperation by respondents. Authority: Department of Commerce, ITA Policy Type: Countervailing Duty (CVD) Event Type: Final Determination China Indicator: Explicit Key identifiers: Case C-570-208 Key date: Final determination issued January 15, 2026 Source: Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes – Final CVD Determination Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes — Antidumping Duty (Final Affirmative Determination) Commerce found that polypropylene corrugated boxes from China are being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value at a margin of 83.64 percent, adjusted for subsidy offsets. This determination covers all Chinese producers and exporters as part of the China-wide entity. Authority: Department of Commerce, ITA Policy Type: Antidumping Duty (AD) Event Type: Final Determination China Indicator: Explicit Key identifiers: Case A-570-207 Key date: Final determination issued January 15, 2026 Source: Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes – Final LTFV Determination L-Lysine — Countervailing Duty (Preliminary Affirmative Determination) Commerce preliminarily determined that L-lysine from China received countervailable subsidies. The primary company, Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co., Ltd., was assigned a subsidy rate of 39.50 percent, while others relying on adverse facts available were assigned 80.37 percent. The final CVD determination will be aligned with the companion AD investigation. Authority: Department of Commerce, ITA Policy Type: Countervailing Duty (CVD) Event Type: Preliminary Determination China Indicator: Explicit Key identifiers: Case C-570-216 Key date: Preliminary determination effective January 22, 2026 Source: L-Lysine from China – Preliminary CVD Determination Fiberglass Door Panels — Antidumping Duty (Preliminary Affirmative Determination) Commerce preliminarily found that fiberglass door panels from China are being sold at less than fair value, with dumping margins ranging from 38.78 to 147.85 percent. The investigation covers Chinese producers including Dalian Capstone Engineering and Jiangxi Fangda Tech Co., Ltd. The final determination was postponed and provisional measures extended. Authority: Department of Commerce, ITA Policy Type: Antidumping Duty (AD) Event Type: Preliminary Determination China Indicator: Explicit Key identifiers: Case A-570-209 Key date: Preliminary determination December 23, 2025 Source: Fiberglass Door Panels – Preliminary LTFV Determination Hardwood and Decorative Plywood — Countervailing Duty (Preliminary Affirmative Determination) Commerce preliminarily found that Chinese producers and exporters of hardwood and decorative plywood benefited from countervailable subsidies, with an 81.34 percent ad valorem rate based on facts available. The determination also found affirmative critical circumstances, applying duties retroactively by 90 days. Final determination will align with the related AD investigation. Authority: Department of Commerce, ITA Policy Type: Countervailing Duty (CVD) Event Type: Preliminary Determination China Indicator: Explicit Key identifiers: Case C-570-212 Key date: Preliminary determination December 29, 2025 Source: Hardwood and Decorative Plywood from China – Preliminary CVD Determination Hardwood and Decorative Plywood — Countervailing Duty (Preliminary Determinations on Indonesia and Vietnam) Although not China-specific, Commerce issued concurrent preliminary affirmative determinations involving Indonesia and Vietnam, both aligned with the corresponding antidumping investigations. The Vietnam notice acknowledges product overlap and scope consistency discussions with the China case. 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The Department of Commerce issued multiple AD and CVD determinations, notably on polypropylene corrugated boxes, L-lysine, fiberglass door panels, and hardwood plywood from China. Subsidy and dumping margins for covered Chinese commodities range from about 39 percent to 147 percent. The ITC initiated a formal enforcement proceeding under Section 337, emphasizing ongoing scrutiny of post-order compliance. Several determinations were aligned with companion investigations, ensuring synchronized final decisions for AD and CVD measures. Commerce invoked adverse facts available (AFA) in multiple cases where Chinese respondents or governments did not cooperate. 4) Full Source Links (Index) Certain Pre-Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair – ITC Enforcement Proceeding Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes – Final CVD Determination (China) Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes – Final LTFV Determination (China) L-Lysine from China – Preliminary CVD Determination Fiberglass Door Panels from China – Preliminary AD Determination Hardwood and Decorative Plywood from China – Preliminary CVD Determination Hardwood and Decorative Plywood from Indonesia – Preliminary CVD Determination Hardwood and Decorative Plywood from Vietnam – Preliminary CVD Determination 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value
U.S. Finds Chinese Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has issued a final ruling about corrugated boxes from China. The government decided that polypropylene corrugated boxes from the People’s Republic of China are being sold in the United States for less than fair value. This trade practice is known as dumping. The boxes are used to hold or carry goods. They are made from corrugated polypropylene sheets. These sheets have air pockets that make them strong and lightweight. The final ruling comes after the Department’s review of the investigation period, which ran from July 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. Commerce published its preliminary ruling on August 28, 2025. That ruling also found that dumping had taken place. No one gave public comments to oppose or change the initial decision. Due to a government funding lapse and shutdown, deadlines were changed twice—once on November 14, 2025, adding 47 days, and again on November 24, 2025, adding 21 more days. The final ruling was released on January 15, 2026. No Chinese companies took part in the investigation. So, Commerce used “facts available with adverse inferences” (AFA). This means they based the rate for all box producers in China on facts in the record and assumed the worst outcome for not cooperating. Because no companies got a separate rate, all producers in China are treated as one “China-wide entity.” The final dumping margin is 83.64 percent. The deposit rate (after adjusting for export subsidies) is set at 82.21 percent. No calculations were needed to be shared because the rate used was based entirely on AFA, not on any responses from companies. The product scope includes boxes, bins, totes, and other containers made with corrugated polypropylene sheets from China. These sheets may be known by different names, including fluted or hollow-core sheets. The boxes may be printed or blank, with or without handles, lids, tops, or wires. U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will keep holding back (suspending liquidation of) imports of the products in question. This has been in effect since August 28, 2025. CBP must require cash deposits from importers equal to the dumping margin. For China-based sellers and third-country exporters alike, this deposit rate will be adjusted for export subsidies, as listed in the recent chart. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will now decide if the domestic industry in the U.S. is being hurt or is in danger of being hurt by these imports. They have up to 45 days to make this decision. If the ITC says there is no injury, the case will end and cash deposits will be returned. If the ITC finds injury, the Department of Commerce will issue an antidumping duty order. Such an order would require CBP to collect duties on all subject goods that entered the U.S. after the preliminary ruling date. If the case closes with a negative injury outcome, parties that received sensitive information must destroy or return it, as required under federal protective rules. This decision was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on January 15, 2026. The product is identified in trade under the code 3923.10.9000 in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). However, the written scope of the items is what matters for this decision. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Polypropylene Corrugated Boxes From the People’s Republic of China: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination
U.S. Finalizes Countervailing Duties on Plastic Boxes from China Estimated reading time: 5–6 minutes On January 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce announced its final determination in the countervailing duty (CVD) investigation concerning polypropylene corrugated boxes from the People’s Republic of China. The Commerce Department found that Chinese producers and exporters of these plastic boxes received unfair government subsidies during the period from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The subsidy rates for five Chinese companies were set at 62.27%. These companies are: Dongguan Jian Xin Plastic Products Jinan Mantis Co Ltd Ningbo Luchen Packaging Technology Co., Ltd. Shandong PPKG I&E Co. Ltd. Suzhou Huiyuan Plastic Products Co All other Chinese exporters or producers of these boxes will also receive the same rate of 62.27%. The rates are based on “adverse facts available” because these companies and the Government of China did not provide full information requested by the Commerce Department. A verification was not conducted for these companies. The scope of the case covers plastic boxes made from corrugated polypropylene sheets. These boxes may be made in one piece, two pieces, or multiple pieces. They may include features like lids, handles, tabs, printing, or reinforcements. The boxes fall under the U.S. customs code 3923.10.9000. This case started with a preliminary determination published on August 20, 2025. The petitioners in the case are: CoolSeal USA Inc. Inteplast Group Corporation SeaCa Plastic Packaging Technology Container Corp. The final stage in the investigation is now in the hands of the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). The ITC has 45 days from the Commerce Department’s decision to decide if these imports harm or threaten to harm U.S. industry. If the ITC makes a final affirmative injury finding, the Commerce Department will issue a formal countervailing duty order. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will then collect cash deposits based on the 62.27% rate on all future entries of the subject merchandise. If the ITC finds no harm, this proceeding will end. In that case, all collected deposits will be refunded, and no duties will be applied. The Commerce Department stopped the suspension of liquidation for goods entered after December 17, 2025. However, it will reinstate this suspension — and resume collecting duties — if the ITC makes a positive injury determination. The Commerce Department will also provide non-confidential information from this investigation to the ITC and allow secure access to confidential information under proper procedures. For parties involved under an Administrative Protective Order (APO), if the ITC issues a negative injury determination, they must destroy or return all proprietary information in compliance with federal rules, or convert it to a judicial protective order. This final determination was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, on January 15, 2026. The full scope of the investigation and product definitions are included in the official notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Hardwood and Decorative Plywood From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, Preliminary Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination, and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination
U.S. Announces Preliminary Countervailing Duties on Chinese Plywood Estimated reading time: 6–10 minutes On January 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce released a preliminary finding in the Federal Register. The agency found that hardwood and decorative plywood from the People’s Republic of China received unfair subsidies. This is a countervailing duty (CVD) investigation. The period of investigation covers January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. Key Findings The Department of Commerce preliminarily determined that certain producers and exporters in China received countervailable subsidies. Subsidies are financial help from the government that gives unfair benefits in trade. The following companies were found to receive such subsidies: Xuzhou Shelter Import and Export Co., Ltd. Linyi Evergreen Wood Co., Ltd. Bergey (Tianjin) International Larkcop International Co., Ltd. Linyi Dongstar Import & Export Co., Ltd. Linyi Jiahe Wood Industry Co. Ltd. Linyi Ocean International Trading Co. Xuzhou Edlon Wood Products Co., Ltd. Xuzhou New Defu Wood International Xuzhou Tianshan Wood Co., Ltd. Yishui Win-Win Wood Co., Ltd. These companies did not cooperate with the investigation. The Commerce Department applied “facts available with adverse inferences” (AFA) under section 776 of the Tariff Act of 1930. Based on this, each received a preliminary subsidy rate of 81.34%. The “all others” subsidy rate is also 81.34%, because all individually examined companies received that rate based on adverse facts. Critical Circumstances Commerce made a preliminary affirmative determination of “critical circumstances.” This means that the imports may have surged in a short period, harming the U.S. industry. The determination applies to Linyi Evergreen, Xuzhou Shelter, the non-responsive companies, and all others. As a result, suspension of liquidation and duties will apply to entries made up to 90 days before this public notice. Suspension of Liquidation U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will: Suspend liquidation of subject imports (plywood from China) entered on or after 90 days before January 22, 2026. Require cash deposits equal to the 81.34% preliminary subsidy rate. Scope of Products The products covered are hardwood and decorative plywood from China. These include multilayered panels that have: Two or more wood veneers with or without a core. At least a face or back veneer made from hardwood, softwood, or bamboo. The plywood may be coated, covered, or finished. It may also have minor processing like cutting or drilling. It includes plywood processed in third countries that fits the criteria. Products excluded from the investigation include: Structural plywood certified to U.S. standards. Certain bamboo products. Hardwood plywood already under existing orders from 2018. Multilayered wood flooring. Assembled or ready-to-assemble furniture and kitchen cabinets. Finished countertops and table tops. Specific LVL window and door components. Two-ply products not glued to additional plies. Product codes under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) are listed, but Customs may classify the imported goods differently. Alignment With Companion AD Investigation Commerce is aligning the final CVD determination with the final Antidumping Duty (AD) determination in the related case. The final determination is expected by May 11, 2026, unless postponed. Public Comments Interested parties may submit written case briefs within 30 days from publication. Rebuttal briefs may be filed within five days after that. Each brief must have: A table of contents. A table of authorities. A public executive summary for each issue, limited to 450 words per issue. Hearing requests must be submitted within 30 days of publication. No Verification Because the companies did not cooperate, Commerce will not conduct on-site verification. International Trade Commission Notification Commerce will inform the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC). If the final determination is affirmative, the ITC will decide whether the U.S. industry is materially injured or threatened. Next Steps This notice is the preliminary stage. The final decision may confirm or change these findings. Authority The notice is issued under authority of sections 703(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and 19 CFR 351.205(c). Dated: 2025-12-29 Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, Performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Hardwood and Decorative Plywood From Indonesia: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination
U.S. Finds Indonesian Plywood Producers Received Unfair Subsidies; Imports Face New Duties Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On January 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce (Commerce) announced a preliminary determination in its countervailing duty (CVD) investigation into hardwood and decorative plywood from Indonesia. Commerce determined that Indonesian producers and exporters are benefiting from unfair government subsidies. This investigation covers plywood products exported from Indonesia during the period January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. The preliminary findings come under section 703(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The investigation was originally announced on June 16, 2025. Due to delays caused by the July 2025 postponement, the November 2025 federal government shutdown, and document backlogs, the preliminary decision was delayed and finalized on December 29, 2025. This determination aligns with the timeline for a related antidumping duty investigation concerning the same product from Indonesia. The final determinations for both investigations are expected by May 11, 2026. Commerce examined three companies. These companies received the following subsidy rates: PT Mustika Buana Sejahtera: 128.66 percent (based on facts available with adverse inferences due to lack of cooperation). PT Sengon Indah Mas (and cross-owned PT Java Wood Industri): 2.40 percent. PT Wijaya Cahaya Timber Tbk. (WCT): 62.68 percent. WCT was found to be cross-owned with six other companies, one of which remains confidential. All other Indonesian producers and exporters received a 43.18 percent subsidy rate. Commerce used the companies’ export sales data to calculate an “all-others” rate. This ensures unexamined companies are fairly accounted for. Commerce relied partly on “facts available” and used “adverse inferences” where companies did not fully cooperate in the investigation. All companies not fully participating may be subject to higher duties based on this approach, as outlined in sections 776(a) and 776(b) of the Tariff Act. As a result of these findings, Commerce will now instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of all plywood imports from Indonesia, effective from the date of this notice. Importers must now pay cash deposits based on the subsidy rates listed above. Commerce plans to verify all submitted data before making the final determination. Interested parties may submit written comments after verification. They may also request a hearing within 30 days of this notice. The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will independently determine if Indonesian plywood imports harm the U.S. industry. The ITC will make its final injury determination by either 120 days from this notice or 45 days after Commerce’s final determination, whichever is later. This investigation applies to hardwood and decorative plywood, including veneered panels with a wood or bamboo face or back. It excludes structural plywood, bamboo products, ready-to-assemble (RTA) furniture, and other products listed in the full Scope found in Appendix I of the determination. The public version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum and full scope language can be accessed via https://access.trade.gov/public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. For further information, contact: Benito Ballesteros at (202) 482-7425 Samuel Evans at (202) 482-2420 Both are from the Office IX, Enforcement and Compliance, U.S. Department of Commerce. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Hardwood and Decorative Plywood From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination, Preliminary Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances, and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination
U.S. Finds Subsidies on Plywood from Vietnam, Sets Preliminary Duties Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has made a preliminary decision in its investigation of hardwood and decorative plywood from Vietnam. The Commerce Department found that companies in Vietnam received subsidies that violate U.S. trade laws. This investigation covers the period from January 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. The case is handled by the International Trade Administration’s Enforcement and Compliance unit. The products involved include flat, multilayered plywood panels. These are made of wood veneers, with at least one face or back layer made from hardwood, softwood, or bamboo. These panels are used in a range of furniture, flooring, and building products. Commerce began its investigation on June 16, 2025. The deadline for the preliminary decision was postponed after a federal government shutdown and a backlog in the filing system. The new deadline became December 29, 2025. Two Vietnamese companies were investigated in detail: Junma Phu Tho Co., Ltd Trieu Thai Son., Ltd Junma received an estimated subsidy rate of 26.75 percent. Trieu Thai received a rate of 4.37 percent. Other companies that were not individually examined received a rate of 15.56 percent. This “all-others” rate is based on a simple average of the two company rates. Commerce used facts available to reach parts of its decision where data was missing. A full explanation is in the preliminary decision memorandum available on the official ACCESS website. Commerce also looked at whether “critical circumstances” exist. This refers to whether imports surged suddenly to avoid duties. Commerce found that this was not the case. So, no early duties will be applied. The final decision in this countervailing duty (CVD) investigation is aligned with the final decision in the related anti-dumping investigation. The final decisions will come by May 11, 2026, unless postponed. Commerce will now instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to stop liquidation of entries of this plywood from Vietnam. This means importers must pay cash deposits using the duty rates listed. Commerce plans to verify the data submitted by the companies. If needed, corrections may be made to this preliminary ruling before the final decision. Parties can submit comments and briefs after verification reports are issued. Rebuttals must follow five days later. Any party that wants a hearing must make their request within 30 days of January 22, 2026. If the final determination is also affirmative, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will then decide whether the imports from Vietnam are harming the U.S. industry. This investigation could impact a wide range of wood-based products imported from Vietnam. The full details, including the scope of products affected and HTSUS codes, are included in the official notice published in the Federal Register on January 22, 2026. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Fiberglass Door Panels From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination and Extension of Provisional Measures
U.S. Finds Chinese Fiberglass Door Panels Are Being Sold Below Fair Value Estimated reading time: 4–8 minutes On January 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce made a preliminary finding in its investigation of fiberglass door panels from China. The Commerce Department ruled that fiberglass door panels from the People’s Republic of China are being sold in the U.S. at less than fair value. The investigation covers the period from July 1, 2024, through December 31, 2024. This decision was made under Section 733(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930. The initial investigation was announced on April 15, 2025. The preliminary determination was delayed by 50 days on August 12, 2025. Due to a government shutdown and a tolling adjustment, the deadline for the preliminary decision was moved to December 23, 2025. The fibreglass panels under investigation include door panels and sidelights made with fiberglass skins. These may be finished or unfinished, with or without frames and glass inserts. These panels may be part of larger entry door systems. All such panels made in China are covered whether processed in another country or not. The products are classified under U.S. Harmonized Tariff Schedule code 3925.20.0010. They may also fall under other codes such as 4418.29.4000; 4418.29.8030; 4418.29.8060; and 7019.90.5150. Some types of products are excluded. For example, goods already covered under the antidumping duty orders on wood mouldings and float glass from China are not part of this new investigation. Commerce used a separate rate for certain companies that qualified. Two firms were individually examined: Dalian Capstone Engineering Co., Ltd., and Jiangxi Fangda Tech Co., Ltd. Dalian Capstone Engineering Co., Ltd. was assigned a dumping margin of 38.78%. After adjusting for subsidies, the cash deposit rate is 38.75%. Jiangxi Fangda Tech Co., Ltd. and two related firms — Jiangxi Hangda Tech Co., Ltd. and Jiangxi Onda Tech Co., Ltd. — received a margin of 99.49%, with a cash deposit rate of 99.40%. A “China-wide” entity received a dumping margin of 147.85%. This rate was based on facts available and adverse assumptions due to lack of cooperation. Certain producers not individually examined but eligible for separate treatment received a dumping margin of 68.93%. Their adjusted cash deposit rate is 68.87%. These companies are: Anhui Xinyu Fiberglass Door Co., Ltd. Wuxi Lutong Fiberglass Doors Co., Ltd. (when exported by East Grace Corporation) Wuxi Lutong Fiberglass Doors Co., Ltd. (when exported by Wuxi Xinli New Material Co., Ltd.) Commerce will send instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection to suspend liquidation of subject goods entered on or after January 22, 2026. Importers must post cash deposits equal to rates listed in the determination chart. If the related subsidy investigation ends before this one, importers may need to post higher cash deposits for the remainder of this proceeding. Commerce will conduct a verification of the data used in this case. Interested parties may file case briefs. These are due seven days after the last verification report is released. Rebuttal briefs are allowed within five days after case briefs are submitted. Each brief must include a table of contents, a table of legal authorities, and an executive summary with footnotes. A hearing may be held, if requested, on issues raised in the briefs. Dalian Capstone requested a delay of the final determination and an extension of provisional measures. Commerce granted this request. Now, the final determination will be due no later than 135 days from the publication of this preliminary finding. The U.S. International Trade Commission has also been notified. If the final determination is affirmative, the Commission will determine whether these imports injured or threaten to injure the domestic industry. This decision was signed by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations on December 23, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
L-Lysine From the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Alignment of Final Determination With Final Antidumping Duty Determination
U.S. Commerce Department Issues Preliminary Ruling on Chinese Lysine Imports Estimated reading time: 3–6 minutes On January 22, 2026, the U.S. Department of Commerce published a preliminary determination in the Federal Register regarding the ongoing countervailing duty (CVD) investigation concerning L-lysine imports from the People’s Republic of China. The Department found that Chinese producers and exporters of L-lysine benefited from countervailable subsidies. These subsidies are financial contributions from authorities, providing benefits that are specific and unfair under U.S. trade law. The investigation covers lysine widely used in animal feed. This includes several types: lysine monohydrochloride (lysine HCL), lysine sulfate, and liquid lysine. The scope also includes coated or encapsulated lysine as well as mixtures with other products. The covered products are classified under HTSUS code 2922.41.0090. Other possible classifications include 2922.41.0010, 2922.49.4950, 2309.90.7000, and 2309.90.9500. The period of investigation spans from January 1, 2024, to December 31, 2024. The preliminary determination was originally scheduled for October 27, 2025, but was delayed due to a government shutdown and backlog. The effective date for the preliminary ruling is January 2, 2026. Commerce conducted the investigation under section 701 of the Tariff Act of 1930. It used facts available and adverse inferences where some companies did not fully cooperate in providing requested information. The Department determined the following preliminary subsidy rates: Inner Mongolia Eppen Biotech Co. Ltd.: 39.50% Heilongjiang Wanli Runda Biotechnology Co., Ltd.: 80.37% (adverse facts available) Shouguang Golden-land Industry & Trading Co Ltd.: 80.37% (adverse facts available) All Other Chinese producers/exporters: 39.50% For Inner Mongolia Eppen, various affiliated firms were found to be cross-owned. These include: Heilongjiang Eppen Trading Co., Ltd. Heilongjiang Eppen Biotech Co., Ltd. Heilongjiang Eppen Energy Co. Ningxia Eppen Biotech Co. Ltd. Star Lake Bioscience Co., Ltd Zhaoqing Guangdong Guangdong Guangxin Holdings Group Ltd. U.S. Customs and Border Protection has been directed to suspend the liquidation of all entries of lysine from China that enter the U.S. on or after the publication date. Importers must post cash deposits equal to the subsidy rates listed. Commerce has also aligned the final determination date of this CVD investigation with the final determination date of the companion antidumping duty investigation. The final determinations are expected no later than May 18, 2026, unless postponed. Commerce will release calculation details within five days and allow parties to submit comments. Interested parties may also request a hearing. The timeline for written briefs and hearing requests will be provided later. If the final determination is affirmative, the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) will decide if imports of lysine from China are causing or threatening injury to the domestic industry. ITC’s decision would be expected within 120 days of this preliminary ruling or 45 days after the final determination, whichever is later. This notice is published under sections 703(f) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and 19 CFR 351.205(c). For additional information, contact: Grant Fuller AD/CVD Operations, Office IX U.S. Department of Commerce (202) 482-6228 Source: Federal Register, Volume 91, Number 14 (January 22, 2026), Document No. 2026-01193. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Certain Pre-Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair and Packaging Therefor; Notice of Institution of Formal Enforcement Proceeding
U.S. International Trade Commission Starts Enforcement Case Over Synthetic Hair Imports Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On January 22, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) announced that it has started a formal enforcement proceeding. This action is related to a prior case about certain pre-stretched synthetic braiding hair and the packaging that comes with it. The new case targets Vivace, Inc. doing business as Dae Do Inc. from Port Washington, New York. Vivace is charged with not following the Commission’s orders from a decision made on September 29, 2025. The initial investigation began on September 9, 2024. It was started after a complaint from JBS Hair of Atlanta, Georgia. The case focused on Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. It related to claims that some companies were importing and selling synthetic hair products that infringed on U.S. patents. Three U.S. patents were involved: Patent No. 10,786,026, Patent No. 10,945,478 (called the ‘478 patent), and Patent No. 10,980,301 (called the ‘301 patent). The USITC investigated many companies. These were split into three groups: Defaulting Respondents: This group included Vivace, A-Hair Import Inc., Crown Pacific Group Inc., Loc N Products, LLC, and Zugoo Import Inc. They were found to be in default in separate rulings throughout late 2024 and early 2025. Consent Order Respondents: These companies agreed to settle. They include Chois International, Inc., I & I Hair Corp., Kum Kang Trading USA, Inc., Mink Hair, Ltd., Oradell International Corp., and Twin Peak International, Inc. Remaining Respondents: These firms were removed from the case when the complainant withdrew the complaint against them on April 29, 2025. On September 29, 2025, the Commission issued limited exclusion orders and cease and desist orders against the Defaulting Respondents, including Vivace. These types of orders are common under Section 337 to stop companies from selling or importing products found to infringe U.S. laws. On December 18, 2025, JBS Hair filed a follow-up enforcement complaint. The claim was that Vivace continued to sell and import items that infringe claim 20 of the ‘478 patent and claims 1, 4 through 9, and 11 of the ‘301 patent. This would violate the previous orders. After reviewing the complaint and documents, the USITC decided the complaint meets the legal requirements for an enforcement proceeding. Now, a formal enforcement process is underway. The Commission has ordered the Chief Administrative Law Judge to pick an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ). This ALJ will conduct the hearings, make findings (called an Enforcement Initial Determination), and suggest further actions if needed. The Commission’s decision to start this process was made on January 20, 2026. This proceeding is under the rules found in 19 CFR 210.75(a). The U.S. Office of Unfair Import Investigations is also a party in the enforcement action. Issued by the Commission’s Secretary, Lisa Barton, on January 20, 2026. Federal Register Document Number: 2026-01184 For access to case documents, view the Commission’s electronic docket at https://edis.usitc.gov. For general information, visit https://www.usitc.gov. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
US Highlights 2026-01-21
US–China Trade Daily Highlights | 2026-01-21 1) Executive Summary Today’s update covers two notices from the U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration (ITA). The first addresses an information collection notice related to import procedures for emergency relief supplies. The second concerns final results of an antidumping duty administrative review on uncoated paper from Brazil. The authorities involved are the Department of Commerce and its Enforcement and Compliance unit, and the primary instruments include procedural and antidumping duty measures. 2) Updates by Authority Department of Commerce (International Trade Administration) Procedures for Importation of Supplies for Use in Emergency Relief Work — Procedural Notice (Policy Notice)The Department of Commerce issued a notice under the Paperwork Reduction Act inviting public comment on the continued information collection related to import procedures for emergency relief work under 19 CFR 358. The regulations provide for waivers of antidumping and countervailing duties on supplies, including food, clothing, and medical goods, imported for use in emergency relief operations. There are no proposed changes to the information collection. Comments are due by March 23, 2026. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: Procedural Notice Event Type: Policy Notice Key identifiers: OMB Control Number 0625-0256; Legal authority 19 U.S.C. 1318(a) Key dates: Comments due by March 23, 2026 China Indicator: None Source: Link Uncoated Paper from Brazil — Antidumping Duty Administrative Review (Trade Remedy)The Department of Commerce published the final results of the 2023–2024 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain uncoated paper from Brazil. Commerce determined that exporter Suzano S.A. sold subject merchandise at less than normal value during the period March 1, 2023, through February 29, 2024, with a weighted-average dumping margin of 14.42 percent. No changes were made from the preliminary results. Assessment and cash deposit instructions were outlined consistent with established procedures. Authority: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration Policy Type: AD/CVD (Antidumping Duty Administrative Review) Event Type: Trade Remedy China Indicator: None Key identifiers: Case No. A-351-842 Key dates: Applicable January 21, 2026; Period of review March 1, 2023 – February 29, 2024 Source: Link 3) Key Takeaways (Factual) The Department of Commerce requested public input on continuing information collection requirements relating to import procedures for emergency relief supplies under 19 CFR 358. The information collection supports waivers of antidumping and countervailing duties on emergency relief materials but proposes no regulatory changes. Commerce finalized its 2023–2024 review of the antidumping order on uncoated paper from Brazil, maintaining a 14.42 percent dumping margin for Suzano S.A. No parties submitted comments on the uncoated paper preliminary results, and the final results remain unchanged. Both notices were published in the Federal Register, Volume 91, Issue 13 (January 21, 2026). 4) Full Source Links (Index) Procedures for Importation of Supplies for Use in Emergency Relief Work – Procedural Notice Uncoated Paper from Brazil – Final Antidumping Administrative Review Results 2023–2024 5) Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected and summarized from publicly available U.S. government materials, including the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content presented is not an official government publication and does not represent the views of any U.S. government authority. This article is provided for informational and research purposes only and does not constitute legal advice, compliance advice, or recommendations for any specific entity or transaction. Readers should refer to the original official documents and consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on this information.
Certain Uncoated Paper From Brazil: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2023-2024
Final Results Issued in 2023–2024 Antidumping Review of Uncoated Paper from Brazil Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Department of Commerce has released the final results of its antidumping duty administrative review on certain uncoated paper from Brazil. The period of review (POR) was from March 1, 2023, through February 29, 2024. The final determination, published in the Federal Register on January 21, 2026 (Volume 91, Number 13), confirms that Suzano S.A. made sales of uncoated paper to the United States at prices below normal value. Commerce calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of 14.42 percent for Suzano S.A. There were no comments submitted after Commerce released its preliminary results on July 10, 2025. As a result, the agency made no changes from the preliminary findings. This review was conducted under section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. The scope of the order includes uncoated paper from Brazil. A full description of the scope is provided in the preliminary decision memorandum referenced in the July 2025 notice. Commerce has instructed U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on entries covered by this review. Because Suzano’s dumping margin is above de minimis (not less than 0.5 percent), importer-specific ad valorem assessment rates will be applied. These are based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping to the total entered value of the sales. If any importer-specific rate is de minimis or zero, CBP will not assess antidumping duties on those entries. For entries of uncoated paper that Suzano produced but did not know were going to the U.S., and where there is no specific rate for the intermediary involved, Commerce will apply the “all-others” rate. Assessment instructions will be issued to CBP no earlier than 35 days after publication of the final findings in the Federal Register. If a summons is filed with the U.S. Court of International Trade, CBP will be instructed not to liquidate entries until the applicable statutory timeline for injunction requests has expired. New cash deposit requirements are now in effect as of January 21, 2026: Suzano will have a deposit rate of 14.42 percent. For companies covered in past reviews but not listed in this review, their previous deposit rates remain in effect. If the exporter was not reviewed, but the producer was, the producer’s most recent rate will apply. For all other manufacturers or exporters, the “all-others” deposit rate of 27.11 percent will apply, as established in the original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation. Importers are reminded of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to certify whether they were reimbursed for antidumping duties. Failure to make this filing could result in double duties. Parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) must properly dispose of proprietary materials as required under 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Written notices confirming this must be submitted timely. This notice was signed on January 14, 2026, by Christopher Abbott, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and Negotiations, performing the non-exclusive functions and duties of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Reference: Federal Register, Doc No. 2026-01025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Procedures for Importation of Supplies for Use in Emergency Relief Work
Commerce Department Seeks Comments on Emergency Relief Supplies Duty Waiver Procedures Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On January 21, 2026, the Department of Commerce published a notice in the Federal Register. The notice concerns an information collection under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The public is invited to submit comments. These comments are related to the process of importing supplies for emergency relief work without paying antidumping and countervailing duties. The regulations at 19 CFR 358.101 through 358.104 allow both for-profit and non-profit groups to import supplies such as food, clothing, and medical items. These must be used in emergency relief work. There are no changes planned to the current rules. However, the Department seeks input to evaluate the process and its impact on those providing information. Each request must be submitted in writing. Three copies are needed. The request should be sent to: Secretary of Commerce Enforcement and Compliance Central Records Unit, Room B-8024 U.S. Department of Commerce 1401 Constitution Avenue NW Washington, DC 20230 The information collection has the following details: OMB Control Number: 0625-0256 Form Numbers: None Type of Review: Regular submission, extension of a current collection Affected Public: For-profit and not-for-profit organizations Estimated Time per Response: 15 minutes Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 15 Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $450 Legal Authority: 19 U.S.C. 1318(a) The Department seeks public comments to: Assess the necessity and usefulness of the information collected. Review the accuracy of the estimated time and cost burden. Explore ways to improve data quality and clarity. Reduce the burden on respondents, including through technology. All comments must be received by March 23, 2026. Comments may be submitted by mail or by email. The emails should be addressed to: [email protected] [email protected] Use the subject line: “OMB Control Number 0625-0256”. Do not include confidential or sensitive information in the comments. All comments will become a matter of public record. Personal identifying information may be made public and cannot be guaranteed to be withheld. For questions or more information, contact: Enforcement and Compliance Office of Communications International Trade Administration U.S. Department of Commerce 14th and Constitution Avenue NW Washington, DC 20230 Phone: 202-482-1413 Email: [email protected] The notice was signed by Sheleen Dumas, Departmental PRA Compliance Officer, Office of the Under Secretary for Economic Affairs, Commerce Department. Federal Register Document Number: 2026-01041 Filed January 20, 2026 Billing Code: 3510-DS-P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.


