Notice of Changes in Z-Wave Alliance, Inc. Membership Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Department of Justice Antitrust Division has published a notice about the Z-Wave Alliance, Inc. This was released in the Federal Register on August 13, 2025. On June 18, 2025, Z-Wave Alliance, Inc. sent written notifications. These were sent to the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. The notifications were sent as required by the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. The notice is for changes in the members of the Z-Wave Alliance. These changes help limit antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under certain rules. The new companies joining as members are: Copeland Comfort Control LP, St. Louis, AL Saya Life Inc, Los Angeles, CA Hubbell Incorporated, Shelton, CT Shenzhen iSurpass Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA HELTUN Inc., Yerevan, REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA RYSE Inc., Toronto, CANADA FireAvert, LLC, Springville, UT The companies leaving as members are: Canny Electrics, Melbourne, COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA Nexa Trading AB, Askim, KINGDOM OF SWEDEN Shenzhen Longzhiyuan Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA There have been no other changes to the membership or plans of the Z-Wave Alliance. Membership remains open. Z-Wave Alliance plans to file more notifications when membership changes again. The Z-Wave Alliance first registered with the Department of Justice on November 19, 2020. This was also shown in a Federal Register notice on December 1, 2020 (85 FR 77241). The last change was filed on March 14, 2025. That change was published in the Federal Register on April 21, 2025 (90 FR 16701). Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations at the Antitrust Division, signed the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

OpenGMSL Association Files Antitrust Notification Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On June 30, 2025, the OpenGMSL Association filed a notice with the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. This was done under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. The Act allows certain groups to work together on research and production. When they file these notices, their risk for some antitrust damages is limited. The OpenGMSL Association is a group of companies working together. The listed members are: Aptiv, Warren, OH Coilcraft, Cary, IL indie, Aliso Viejo, CA Denso Corporation, Aichi, JAPAN Ethernovia, Inc., San Jose, CA GlobalFoundries U.S. Inc., Malta, NY Keysight Technologies, Santa Rosa, CA Rohde & Schwarz GmbH & Co. KG, Munich, GERMANY Rosenberger Hochfrequenztechnik GmbH & Co.KG, Fridolfing, GERMANY TZ Electronic Systems GmbH, Niefern-Oeschelbronn, GERMANY Analog Devices Inc., Wilmington, MA Granite River Labs, Santa Clara, CA Qualcomm Incorporated, San Diego, CA Sony Semiconductor Solutions Corporation, Atsugi, JAPAN The OpenGMSL Association has several goals. First, it plans to make the GMSL (Gigabit Multimedia Serial Link) technology a worldwide standard. This technology helps send video and data using SerDes transmission. Second, it will keep GMSL and its versions—GMSL2 and GMSL3—compatible for easier use. Third, it wants to keep making GMSL better to support video and data link markets around the world. Fourth, it may use these technologies in other industries if allowed by its Board of Directors. Fifth, it will do other actions that help with these goals. Membership in the OpenGMSL Association is still open. The Association will report changes in members as needed. This notice was provided by Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division. The record was published in the Federal Register on August 13, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. Changes Membership Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On July 3, 2025, Cable Television Laboratories, Inc. (CableLabs) filed a notification with the United States Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. This was done under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. CableLabs announced that CableVideo Digital S.A., from Buenos Aires, Argentina, has been terminated as a member of its organization. CableLabs gave this notice to extend special legal protections under the Act. These protections can limit the amount of money antitrust plaintiffs may recover to just actual damages under certain situations. There were no other changes to CableLabs’ membership. There were also no new plans or activities announced for the group. Membership in CableLabs is still open. CableLabs will continue to tell the government about any changes to its membership. CableLabs filed its first notice on August 8, 1988. A notice was published in the Federal Register on September 7, 1988 (53 FR 34593). The last notification before this one was filed on March 20, 2025. That notice was published on April 21, 2025 (90 FR 16705). This notice is signed by Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations in the Antitrust Division. The federal register number for this notice is 2025-15372. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Justice Updates on PXI Systems Alliance Membership Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes On July 8, 2025, PXI Systems Alliance, Inc. filed notifications with the Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. This was under section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. The filing shows there have been changes in the group’s membership. Sigma Advanced Systems Private Limited, based in Telangana, Republic of India, has been added as a new member. Three companies have left the group. They are Stelight Instrument Co., Ltd., from Jiangsu, People’s Republic of China; Power Value Technologies Co., Ltd., from Shanghai, People’s Republic of China; and JX Instrumentation, also from Shanghai, People’s Republic of China. There have been no other changes in either the membership or the planned work of the group research project. Membership in this research group remains open. PXI Systems Alliance plans to file more notifications when membership changes. The original notification for PXI Systems Alliance was filed on November 22, 2000. The Department of Justice published it in the Federal Register on March 8, 2001 (66 FR 13971). The most recent notification before this was filed on April 15, 2025. That was published in the Federal Register on June 11, 2025 (90 FR 24669). Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations from the Antitrust Division, confirmed the notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Notice Issued for Training & Readiness Accelerator II by Department of Justice Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On August 13, 2025, the Department of Justice Antitrust Division posted a notice about the Training & Readiness Accelerator II (TReX II) group. This was published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 154. This notice was filed under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, which is also called the Act. TReX II filed written notifications with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission showing changes in its membership. These notifications are meant to limit antitrust plaintiffs’ recovery to actual damages only, under certain conditions. New Members Added The document lists new members added to the TReX II group. Some of them are: Infiltron Software Suite LLC, Warner Robins, GA Space Information Laboratories LLC, Santa Maria, CA Duality Robotics, Inc., San Mateo, CA Recon RF, Inc., San Diego, CA Exponent, Inc., Menlo Park, CA Oceanit Laboratories, Inc., Honolulu, HI Bluedrop USA, Inc., Orlando, FL Data Squared USA, Inc., Wilmington, DE Other new members include companies from several states such as California, Florida, Maryland, Alabama, Missouri, New York, Michigan, and more. Parties Withdrawn Several companies have withdrawn from TReX II. Some of these are: Integrated Consultants, Inc., San Diego, CA JackTech LLC, Washington, DC JIRACOR LLC, Orlando, FL Open Source Systems LLC, Suwanee, GA Terida LLC, Pinehurst, NC Symbiosis.io LLC, Smyrna, GA Other withdrawn members are from locations like Virginia, Georgia, Ohio, Massachusetts, California, Texas, and more. No Further Changes There are no other changes to either the membership or the planned activities of the research group. The group’s membership remains open. TReX II plans to continue filing notifications about any membership changes. Past Notifications TReX II filed its first notification about its group on February 17, 2023. The Department of Justice posted a related notice on June 13, 2023. The most recent notification before this one was filed on February 7, 2025, and appeared in the Federal Register on March 7, 2025. Summary This official notice documents the latest changes in the Training & Readiness Accelerator II group’s membership. It also confirms the procedures used for antitrust law protections under the Act. Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations at the Antitrust Division, issued this notice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

IEEE Updates Standards Activities Under Federal Antitrust Law Estimated reading time: 1–7 minutes On June 24, 2025, the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) filed written notifications with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. This filing was made under section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. The purpose of this notice is to extend the Act’s provisions. These provisions limit the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under some circumstances. According to the notification, 57 new standards have been started. In addition, 20 existing standards are being revised. More information about these new and revised standards can be found at: https://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/sba/28may2025/ and https://standards.ieee.org/about/sasb/sba/19jun2025/. There are also new or renewed pre-standards activities related to IEEE Industry Connections Activities. Details are at: https://standards.ieee.org/about/bog/cag/approvals/june202/. IEEE first filed a notification under the Act on September 17, 2004. The Department of Justice published a notice about that on November 3, 2004 (69 FR 64105). The last notification before this one was filed with the Department on April 10, 2025. A notice about that was published in the Federal Register on April 23, 2025 (90 FR 17079). Suzanne Morris is the Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division. [FR Doc. 2025-15381 Filed 8-12-25; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Justice Releases Notice on ROS-Industrial Consortium Americas Membership Changes Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Department of Justice has issued a notice about the Research Group on ROS-Industrial Consortium Americas. This notice appears in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 154, dated Wednesday, August 13, 2025. The notification comes under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. On June 18, 2025, the Southwest Research Institute–Cooperative Research Group on ROS-Industrial Consortium-Americas (called “RIC-Americas”) sent updates about its membership to the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. Two new organizations were added to the group. These are Edison Welding Institute in Columbus, Ohio, and Zachry Corporation in San Antonio, Texas. At the same time, Tormach, Inc., from Madison, Wisconsin, has withdrawn as a party to this research group. No other changes have been made in the group’s membership or activities. The group’s membership is still open. RIC-Americas will continue to file written updates about any new membership changes. RIC-Americas first filed for coverage under this Act on April 30, 2014. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register on June 9, 2014, about this filing. The last update was sent to the Department on August 29, 2023. A notice for that update appeared in the Federal Register on November 20, 2023. This current notice is signed by Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations at the Antitrust Division. For more details, see Federal Register document number 2025-15382. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Chemtos, LLC Applies to Make Bulk Controlled Substances Estimated reading time: 7–10 minutes The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has posted a notice about Chemtos, LLC. The company has applied to be registered as a bulk manufacturer. This means they want to make large amounts of certain controlled substances. Application Information Chemtos, LLC sent their application on July 4, 2025. Their address is 16713 Picadilly Court, Round Rock, Texas, 78664-8544. Comments and Objections Anyone who is already a registered bulk manufacturer can comment on or object to this application. The deadline for comments or requests for a hearing is October 7, 2025. Comments must be sent online through the Federal eRulemaking Portal at www.regulations.gov. People can type their comments or upload longer files. Submitters will get a Comment Tracking Number after sending in their comments. Controlled Substances Listed Chemtos, LLC has applied to make a large number of controlled substances. These include drugs in both Schedule I and Schedule II. Schedule I drugs have a high chance for abuse and have no accepted medical use in the United States. Schedule II drugs also have a high chance for abuse but are used for some medical treatments. Schedule I Controlled Substances Amineptine Cathinone Methcathinone Mephedrone N-Ethylamphetamine Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB) Methaqualone Etizolam Fentanyl-related compounds as defined in 21 CFR 1308.11(h) Lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) Marihuana (synthetic) Tetrahydrocannabinols (synthetic) Psilocybin Heroin Methyldesorphine Methyldihydromorphine Bufotenine A wide range of synthetic cannabinoids (like JWH-018, UR-144, AB-FUBINACA) Many fentanyl analogs and other synthetic opioids Schedule II Controlled Substances Amphetamine Methamphetamine Lisdexamfetamine Phenmetrazine Methylphenidate Amobarbital Pentobarbital Secobarbital Nabilone Phencyclidine (PCP) Cocaine Codeine Hydrocodone Oxycodone Methadone Morphine Fentanyl Sufentanil Carfentanil Tapentadol The full list includes many more substances and covers several pages. How These Substances Will be Used Chemtos, LLC plans to manufacture and distribute these controlled substances as reference standards. Reference standards are used by labs and agencies for various tests. For the drug codes 7360 (Marihuana) and 7370 (Tetrahydrocannabinols), the company will only make them as synthetic substances. No other activities with these drugs are allowed under this registration. Contact Details and Notices The notice was signed by Justin Wood, Acting Deputy Assistant Administrator for the DEA. The official document (FR Doc. 2025-15115) was filed on August 7, 2025. The notice appears in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 151, dated August 8, 2025, on pages 38502 to 38507. Businesses or people who want to make comments or objections have until October 7, 2025. All comments must be sent using the online portal given by the DEA. This is a public notice. It is provided so people and companies know about Chemtos, LLC’s application and can respond if needed. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Justice Announces Religious Liberty Commission’s Second Public Meeting Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The United States Department of Justice (DOJ) will hold the second meeting of the Religious Liberty Commission on September 8, 2025. This meeting will take place from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the World Stage Theater, Museum of the Bible, 400 4th St. SW, Washington, DC 20024. The meeting is open to the public. Those who wish to attend in person must register ahead of time on the Religious Liberty Commission’s website at https://www.justice.gov/religious-liberty-commission. Only the first 300 people who register will be allowed to attend in person. Attendees must show identification and go through a security screening before entering. The meeting will also be recorded and available to watch live at justice.gov/live. Media guests are required to register with the Office of Public Affairs before September 5, 2025, at 5 p.m. Media must also present a government-issued photo ID and valid media credentials, and go through security. For more information about the meeting or to request a reasonable accommodation to attend, contact Mary Margaret Bush, the Designated Federal Officer for the Religious Liberty Commission, at 202-297-3196 or by email. The Religious Liberty Commission was created by the President through Executive Order 14291. The Commission has a chair, a vice chair, 11 members appointed by the President from private and public sectors, plus three ex-officio members. The Commission’s goal is to advise the Domestic Policy Council and the White House Faith Office on important religious liberty policies in the United States. The Commission will provide a full report to the President. The report will cover the foundations of religious liberty in America, the effects of religious liberty on American society, current threats to domestic religious liberty, ways to protect religious liberty in the future, and ideas for programs to promote and celebrate America’s religious diversity. The main topic for this meeting will be religious liberty in public education. The Commission will hear from parents and students. Panels will include elementary, secondary, undergraduate, and graduate students. Experts in religious liberty and public education will also give testimonies. The goal is to understand the history of religious liberty in public schools, identify current threats, and find opportunities to protect religious liberty in schools for the future. The public can send in written comments about religious liberty in public education. Comments must be sent by September 1, 2025. They can be emailed to the Commission or mailed to: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the Associate Attorney General, ATTN: Religious Liberty Commission, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Room 5706, Washington, DC 20530. This meeting notice is published as required by the Federal Advisory Committee Act (5 U.S.C. 1001 et seq.). Dated: July 28, 2025. Mary Margaret Bush, Designated Federal Officer, Religious Liberty Commission. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

DOJ Announces New Information Collection for DEA Wellness Program Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes Purpose of the Collection The new collection, called the “DEA Voluntary Wellness Program Healthcare Provider Clearance,” is required for DEA employees who want to join physical fitness activities under the Wellness Program. To make sure it is safe for employees to join these activities, they must submit a health assessment form. This form must be filled out by a licensed medical professional before taking part. This process helps keep employees safe and supports the agency’s health and wellness efforts. How the Information Will Be Used The main goal is to check if DEA employees are medically able to safely take part in physical activities. The results will help prevent injuries or worsening of any health conditions. This requirement comes from the DEA Personnel Manual 2792. Employees must get medical clearance before starting any voluntary wellness activities with the agency. Details of the Collection The collection uses form DEA-315c. Only a licensed medical professional can fill out the form. The form is required before an employee can take part in wellness activities. Estimated Burden The DEA estimates about 100 people will respond each year. Each response will take about 45 minutes to complete. The total annual burden is expected to be 75 hours. There is no annual cost burden to the DEA. How to Comment Comments are welcome for 60 days, until October 3, 2025. If you have comments or need a copy of the information collection, you can contact Benjamin Inks, Office of Compliance, Policy Administration Section, 700 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 22202, phone: 571-672-4524, or email at the address listed in the notice. For Further Information If you need more information, contact Darwin Arceo at the Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE, 4W-218, Washington, DC. Dated: July 31, 2025. Darwin Arceo Department Clearance Officer for PRA U.S. Department of Justice Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Justice Requests Comments on OJJDP NTTAC Feedback Form Package Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Department of Justice’s Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) is asking for public comments on a feedback form package. This package is managed by the National Training and Technical Assistance Center (NTTAC). The request was published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 148, on August 5, 2025. The OJJDP wants feedback about collecting information from people who use their training and technical help. This information helps the agency know how well they are doing and find ways to help people better. What Is Being Collected The feedback forms are given to: People who get technical help from OJJDP Conference attendees Training and technical help providers Online meeting and in-person meeting participants Focus group participants The forms ask about satisfaction with the help, the quality, efficiency, and resources provided. They also ask about any other needs for training or help. Who Responds People who may need to fill out the forms include: Individuals or households Federal, state, local, or tribal government Nonprofit institutions Businesses How the Information Is Used The data from the forms is used to: Improve support for OJJDP NTTAC users Help the juvenile justice field Improve services and outcomes for youth Estimated Impact The Department of Justice thinks about 4,756 people will respond to these forms. The time it takes to fill out a form is estimated to be between 0.03 hours (about 2 minutes) and 1.5 hours. The total estimated time for all responses in one year is 430.5 hours. How to Comment The comment period is open until September 4, 2025. People may: Ask for a copy of the information collection instrument Make suggestions or comments about the time it takes to respond Contact Jill Molter at OJJDP NTTAC for more information by phone at 202-514-8871 or by email Written comments can also be sent to the Office of Management and Budget in Washington, DC. For More Information Anyone needing more information can contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, Justice Management Division, at the Department of Justice’s Washington, DC office. The notice was dated July 31, 2025. This announcement meets the requirements of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Justice Seeks Comments on ATF Program for Relief from Firearm Disabilities Estimated reading time: 3 minutes The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), part of the Department of Justice, is asking for public comments. The request is about an information collection program. This program is called “Certifying Qualifying State Relief from Disabilities Program.” The ATF wants to keep collecting information for this program. They are sending a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to approve it again. This is required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. What is the Program? The program comes from the NICS Improvement Act. This Act helps make sure states report mental health records. These records can prevent someone from buying a firearm if they are not allowed to. States can get grants to help them make these reports better. But to get the grants, a state must have a program. This program lets people who were not allowed to have a firearm because of a mental health decision ask for that right back. A state official must certify to ATF that such a program exists. Details about the Collection Type of Collection: This is an extension of a collection that was already approved before. Form Number: ATF Form 3210.12. Who Responds: State, local, and tribal governments. Responding is needed if they want to get or keep grant funding. How Often: Each respondent will complete the collection once every year. Time Needed: It takes about 15 minutes (0.25 hours) for each person to complete. Number of Respondents: ATF expects about 10 responses every year. Total Time Spent: All together, this will add up to about 2.5 hours per year. Total Cost: The estimated cost for all respondents together is $120 a year. Table—Estimated Annual Burden and Cost Activity Number of Respondents Frequency Total Annual Responses Time per Response Total Burden (hours) Hourly Rate Monetized Value of Time Complete 10 1 10 0.25 2.5 $47.92 $120 How to Comment Comments will be accepted for 60 days. The deadline is October 6, 2025. People can send suggestions or talk about the time needed to respond. Comments can also suggest better ways to collect the information. Contact Information For more information or to get a copy of the collection form, contact Pamela Eisert, FIPB, at ATF. The address is 99 New York Ave NE, Washington, DC 20226. You can also email or call 202-648-7190. If you need more information, you can contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, at the U.S. Department of Justice, Justice Management Division, Policy and Planning Staff, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE, 4W-218, Washington, DC. Official Notice This notice was signed on July 31, 2025, by Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer for PRA, U.S. Department of Justice. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

ATF Updates on Gun Trace Requests: Important Changes Announced Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Collection Renewal and Changes The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), part of the Department of Justice, is making changes to how law enforcement agencies ask for gun traces. These requests use the National Tracing Center (NTC) Trace Request form, also called ATF Form 3312.1 or 3312.1S. The form helps police and other law enforcement agencies get information about guns used in crimes. ATF is asking the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to renew and approve their information collection. People may send comments for the next 60 days, until October 6, 2025. ATF wants to hear what the public thinks about the collection and if it is useful, the time it takes, and if the form is easy to use. What ATF is Changing The number of law enforcement agencies using the form each year will increase from 1,153 to 17,000. The number of trace requests will rise from 24,490 to 510,000. The total time agencies spend on this will increase from 2,449 hours to 51,000 hours. Total yearly estimated cost to agencies will be $2,443,920. Who Uses the Form? State, local, and tribal law enforcement agencies use the form. It is not required by ATF but is needed if an agency wants a gun to be traced. How the Process Works Each law enforcement agency will send about 30 trace requests every year. Filling out each request takes about 6 minutes. ATF does not make a gun registry during this process. Only the agency that requested the information gets the results. Details for Public Comment People who want to comment or want a copy of the form can contact Carrie Robertson at the National Tracing Center Division by mail, email, or phone. The public should tell ATF if the collection is necessary, if the time needed is correct, if the process can be improved, or if there are better ways to collect the information. Contact for More Information If you need more information, contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer at the U.S. Department of Justice. Summary Table Activity Number of Respondents Frequency Total Annual Responses Time per Response Total Burden (hours) Hourly Rate Cost LEA trace requests 17,000 30 510,000 6 minutes 51,000 $47.92 $2,443,920 This notice was dated July 31, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

ATF Seeks Comments on Import Form Update for Firearms, Ammunition, and Defense Articles Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) is asking for public comments on a new version of its form called “Application and Permit to Import Firearms, Ammunition, and Defense Articles.” The form is known as ATF Form 5330.3B, or “Form 6, Part II.” Purpose of the Notice The ATF needs to collect information from individuals who want to bring firearms, ammunition, or defense articles into the United States. This process is done through the Form 6, Part II document. The form helps ATF check if what someone wants to bring in can be imported. This update is a regular review under the Paperwork Reduction Act. The comment period will last for 60 days, ending October 6, 2025. Changes to the Form The form title will be changed for better readability. New attachment sheets are added. This helps people who need extra space, especially if importing many items at once. The new sheets are for listing defense articles and ammunition. Instructions on the form are updated. These now include current laws, use easier words, and explain things more clearly. Details like office contact information are updated so people know how to reach out if they need help. Grammar and terminology updates are made throughout. There are no changes to the overall procedure or requirements, but the number of people using the form has dropped. Who Uses This Form? Individuals, like returning military members, use Form 6, Part II to ask permission before bringing firearms, ammunition, or defense articles into the U.S. Filling out the form is required to get approval to import these items. Annual Use and Burden Estimated number of users per year: 312 people. How often: Each user fills it out once a year. Time to fill out: About 30 minutes per person. Total annual time: 156 hours for all users. Estimated total cost of respondent time: $3,588 per year. Comments Needed The ATF wants feedback from the public and any groups who work with the form. They are looking for comments on: Whether the form is needed and useful. If their numbers and estimates are correct. Any ideas to make the form more helpful or clear. Ways to make the form easier, like by using computers or electronics. How to Respond People who want to comment or get more information can contact Austin Funk at the Firearms and Explosives Import Branch. He can be reached by mail at Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, 244 Needy Road, Martinsburg, WV 25405; by email; or by phone at 304-616-4654. For other information, Darwin Arceo at the Department of Justice can also be reached at 145 N Street, NE, Washington, DC. The official notice was signed by Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer for the U.S. Department of Justice, on July 31, 2025. The full information is published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 148, on August 5, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Justice Seeks Public Comments on Immigration Forms Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Department of Justice Seeks Public Comments on Immigration Forms The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) at the Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced a request for public comments on two important immigration forms. The forms are used for people in removal proceedings who want to stay in the United States. The two forms are: Form EOIR-42A (Application for Cancellation of Removal for Certain Permanent Residents) Form EOIR-42B (Application for Cancellation of Removal and Adjustment of Status for Certain Nonpermanent Residents) These forms help the government decide if a person should be allowed to stay in the country even if they are removable. Why Comments Are Needed EOIR wants the public, especially those affected, to comment on whether the forms collect the right information and are easy to use. Comments can also suggest ways to make the process clearer or faster. The goal is to make sure these forms help the agency do its work well. How to Comment Anyone who wants to comment has 60 days, until October 6, 2025. People can ask for more information or share thoughts about the time and effort required to fill out the forms. Questions or requests for more details can be sent to: Justine Fuga Associate General Counsel Executive Office for Immigration Review 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600 Falls Church, VA 22041 Phone: (703) 305-0265 Key Details About the Forms According to U.S. law, people who are being removed from the United States may ask the Attorney General to cancel their removal. To receive this help, the person must show they meet requirements in the law. The forms let EOIR collect all necessary information. Changes Being Made The EOIR will update the forms in several ways: Update information about filing fees Add a Privacy Act Notice Show the expiration date for approval on each form Make small formatting changes so the forms are easier to read Who Will Use These Forms? The forms are for individuals in court proceedings who are at risk of being removed from the United States. Completing the forms helps decide if they can stay. How Many People Will Use the Forms and How Long It Takes Each year: About 1,519 people will fill out Form EOIR-42A About 15,757 people will fill out Form EOIR-42B It takes about 5 hours and 50 minutes for a person to complete each form. Total Hours People Will Spend For Form EOIR-42A: About 8,856 hours For Form EOIR-42B: About 91,865 hours Estimated Costs The government also shared the expected cost for filling out these forms. This includes: The average cost for hiring a lawyer or practitioner The cost to file each form For Form EOIR-42A: Practitioner cost: $408 per response Filing fee: $700 per response Total annual responses: 1,519 Total public cost: $1,683,912 each year For Form EOIR-42B: Practitioner cost: $408 per response Filing fee: $1,600 per response Total annual responses: 15,757 Total public cost: $31,640,056 each year The forms can be submitted electronically, so printing or mailing costs can be zero. How These Costs Are Calculated Costs include lawyers’ fees as estimated by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, and the required government form fees. Further Information Anyone needing more information can contact: Darwin Arceo Department Clearance Officer Justice Management Division United States Department of Justice Two Constitution Square 145 N Street NE, 4W-218 Washington, DC This update was signed by Darwin Arceo of the U.S. Department of Justice on August 1, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

DOJ Announces Changes to NFA Firearm Transfer Form 5 Estimated reading time: 5–10 minutes The Department of Justice (DOJ), through the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF), has shared a notice about updates to ATF Form 5320.5, also known as “Form 5”. This form is used by people and organizations who want to transfer or register National Firearms Act (NFA) firearms without paying the usual transfer tax, if they qualify for a tax exemption. Sixty-Day Comment Period for the Public The DOJ is asking people for comments on these updates. The comment period is open for 60 days, until October 6, 2025. People can share their opinions about the time it takes to complete the form, the form’s usefulness, and suggestions for improvements. What is Form 5 Used For? Form 5 is for people who want to transfer and register an NFA firearm and believe they do not need to pay the tax. The form is used to: Ask for permission and show why the tax does not apply Support transfers that happen because of law changes, such as when a firearm is inherited through an estate Make it easier to temporarily transfer a firearm for repairs and get it back Who’s Affected? Those affected include: Federal government State or local government People or groups transferring unserviceable firearms People must fill out the form to follow the law and get the benefits offered. Increases and Decreases in Reporting Burden The number of people who fill out this form has increased from 10,591 to 17,322 in 2025. But, the average time needed to do the form has dropped from 30 minutes to 12 minutes. Technology now allows: Electronic forms and signatures Fewer people needing to send in fingerprints or photographs The use of cell phone photos and photocopied IDs Sending documents electronically People also don’t need to make an extra copy for local police anymore. Key Changes to Form 5 Some important changes to the form include: A clearer title Taking out the photo box to let people attach a passport photo or a copy of a photo ID Combining race and ethnicity questions More ways to sign electronically or digitally The fillable PDF form now fills in copy 2 as you fill in copy 1, except for check boxes and signature Added links to eForms and pay.gov Information about the refund process Ending the requirement to notify the Chief Law Enforcement Officer (CLEO) and to send a copy New instructions for married couples applying together Corrections to small errors in the form Adding email contacts for specific questions Annual Reporting Details An estimated 17,322 people will fill out Form 5 each year Each form takes about 12 minutes, for a total of about 3,464 hours of work by all respondents The total estimated cost to respondents is $79,672 Contact for More Information For more information, contact Meghan Tisserand at the National Firearms Act Division, using the following: Mail: 244 Needy Road, Martinsburg, WV 25405 Email: [contact emails in original document] Phone: 304-616-3219 Official Record This notice was signed by Darwin Arceo, the Department Clearance Officer for the U.S. Department of Justice, and filed on August 4, 2025. For more details, see the official notice in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 149. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Justice Publishes Notice on Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted Data Collection Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On August 6, 2025, the Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register about collecting data on law enforcement officers who have been killed or assaulted. The Criminal Justice Information Services Division (CJIS) of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is responsible for this data collection. The FBI will send a request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to review and approve this activity. The public is invited to share their comments. You have 60 days to send in your comments—until October 6, 2025. Comments should talk about how useful the information is, if the response time estimates are correct, how to make the data better, and ways to reduce the effort needed to answer. The goal of this collection is to help the FBI’s Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program. The UCR Program is a national center for collecting and sharing information about crime. Each year, it publishes statistics on law enforcement officers who have been killed or assaulted. The legal authority for this collection is Title 28, United States Code, Section 534. Key Details of the Collection: Type: This is an extension of a previously approved collection. Form Title: Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted. Form Number: 1-705. Responsible Agency: CJIS Division, FBI, Department of Justice. Who Responds: Federal, state, county, city, tribal, and territorial law enforcement agencies. Responding is voluntary. Number of Respondents: In 2024, there were 19,328 possible agencies. Of these, 1,084 agencies submitted LEOKA Form 1-705. Estimated Responses: The highest number of responses in 2024 was 13,008. Time for Each Response: Completing the form takes about 7 minutes per response. Total Annual Burden: The total estimated burden for all responses is about 1,517.6 hours each year. The number of agencies using the summary form (Form 1-705) is expected to decrease over time, as more agencies move to the National Incident-Based Reporting System (NIBRS). Agencies using NIBRS report the same information in a different way. If you need more information or have questions, you can contact Linda Shriver, Acting Unit Chief at the FBI CJIS Division, by calling 304-625-4830 or emailing the address in the notice. For more details or to submit comments, contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, U.S. Department of Justice, at the address listed in the notice. This notice appears in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 149, on August 6, 2025, pages 37888-37889. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Department of Justice Seeks Comments on Updated Immigration Forms for Limited Legal Help Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR) at the U.S. Department of Justice has announced updates to two important forms. These forms let lawyers or representatives tell immigration courts or the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) that they are helping someone just with paperwork, not full legal representation. The forms are called EOIR-60 and EOIR-61. The new changes update how forms can be submitted. Now, attorneys and representatives can file EOIR-60 and EOIR-61 online using the EOIR Courts and Appeals System (ECAS) Respondent Access Portal. The rules for filing by mail are changed, and people are told to look at the EOIR Policy Manual for guidance. There is a new section in the forms that lets users say if they gave documents electronically using ECAS. The updates also fix some legal citations in the Privacy Act notice. The forms now say that case information can be found online, in English or Spanish, through the EOIR Automated Case Information System. A new sentence was added to EOIR-60. It tells people that this limited help is not allowed in Department of Homeland Security (DHS) cases that are handled by the Board of Immigration Appeals. These forms are needed for lawyers or representatives who want to help someone with a document or filing, but not appear for the whole case. According to the notice, filling out these forms is required if a person wants to enter a limited appearance in these immigration matters. The Department of Justice says that around 40 people are expected to submit Form EOIR-60 to the BIA each year. Around 22,018 are expected to submit Form EOIR-61 to the immigration courts every year. Each form takes about 6 minutes to fill out. Together, this is about 2,206 total hours of work each year. There are no fees to file, and the forms can be completed electronically. The estimated cost, based on attorney wages, for all these forms each year is about $160,310.02. Comments about these changes are being accepted until September 8, 2025. People who want to give feedback should go to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain and find this collection under “Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments.” The OMB Control Number is 1125-0021. For more information, contact Justine Fuga, Associate General Counsel, EOIR, or Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer. The Department is seeking public comments on whether these forms are needed, their usefulness, the accuracy of the agency’s burden estimates, if the information is clear, and ways to make the process easier through technology. This notice was published on August 7, 2025, in the Federal Register. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Justice Seeks Public Comments on Unfair Immigration-Related Employment Practices Complaint Form Estimated reading time: 5–7 minutes On August 7, 2025, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a request for public comments on the “Unfair Immigration-Related Employment Practices Complaint Form,” known as Form EOIR-58. The notice was published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 150. Purpose of the Form Form EOIR-58 is used by people who want to file a complaint about unfair immigration-related employment practices. These practices include discrimination based on citizenship status or national origin, retaliation or intimidation by employers, and “document abuse” during the hiring process. Document abuse means asking for more or different papers than needed to prove permission to work in the United States, if the reason is to discriminate. How the Complaint Process Works If someone thinks they have faced discrimination under Section 274B of the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), they can file a charge with the DOJ Immigrant and Employee Rights Section (IER). The IER has 120 days to decide if it will file a complaint with the Office of the Chief Administrative Hearing Officer (OCAHO) for the person. If not, the individual may file their own complaint with OCAHO using Form EOIR-58. This form gathers all the information needed so OCAHO can assign the complaint to an Administrative Law Judge. Non-substantive changes have been made to the form and instructions to help with clarity and formatting. The IER’s mailing address and the Privacy Act notice were also updated. The time estimate for filling out the form has been revised. Obligation to Respond Filling out Form EOIR-58 is not required, but it is needed if a person wants to file a complaint under INA Section 274B. Alternatively, a written statement can be sent if it meets the rule requirements in 28 CFR 68.7. Key Details About the Form and Costs Number of Respondents Each Year: Around 38 individuals are expected to fill out the form each year. Time to Complete: Each person takes about 1 hour to fill in the form. How Often: Once a year. Total Annual Time: 38 hours in total. Cost: The estimated cost for filing by mail is about $25.10 per response ($15.00 for printing and $10.10 for mailing), with no fees for submitting by email. If someone uses an attorney, the cost may increase by $72.67 per hour for legal help. The maximum estimated cost to the public for all responses is $3,715.26. There are no labor costs for people who fill the form themselves. Most people currently mail the form to OCAHO, but it can also be submitted by email. The DOJ is working to add full electronic filing, which would remove the needs for printing and postage costs. Submitting Comments Comments are open until September 8, 2025. People can visit www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain to submit their thoughts. They can find the form by selecting “Currently under 30-day Review–Open for Public Comments,” or searching for the title or OMB Control Number 1125-0016. The DOJ asks for public input on: If the collection of information is needed and useful. If the estimated time and burden are correct. How the form and instructions can be clearer. How to reduce the time or cost for people filling out the form, including better use of technology. Additional Information If you need more information, you can contact Justine Fuga at the Executive Office for Immigration Review, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600, Falls Church, VA 22041, or call (703) 305-0265. For other questions, contact Darwin Arceo, Policy and Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, U.S. Department of Justice. Key Dates Notice published: August 7, 2025. Comments due: September 8, 2025. This notice provides an opportunity for the public and agencies to give feedback before the form is approved for use through August 2028, as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Justice Receives Request for Certification of Alabama Capital Counsel Mechanism Estimated reading time: 1–3 minutes On August 7, 2025, the Department of Justice released a public notice about Alabama’s request for certification of its capital counsel mechanism. The request was made to the United States Attorney General. Alabama seeks to have its system for appointing counsel in capital cases officially certified. This would cover appointments, compensation, and covering legal expenses for lawyers who represent people sentenced to death and who cannot afford their own attorneys. Federal law, specifically Chapter 154 of Title 28, United States Code, sets special rules for federal court reviews of cases for prisoners on death row who do not have money for legal help. These special rules are available only if the U.S. Attorney General certifies that a state has a qualified system for appointing and paying competent lawyers to handle these state post-conviction cases. The public notice confirms that Alabama has formally submitted its request. The Department of Justice invites the public to send in comments about this request. How to Comment People can send in written or electronic comments. Comments must be received on or before October 6, 2025. Mailed comments will be accepted if they are postmarked by that date. Electronic comments will be accepted until midnight Eastern Time on October 6, 2025. Where to Submit Comments All comments should reference “Docket No. OLP181.” The Department of Justice asks that comments be submitted electronically at www.regulations.gov using the comment form there. People should not send paper copies if they already submitted their comments online. Anyone who wants to send written comments can mail them to Levi Lall, Counsel, Office of Legal Policy, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20530. More Information Questions about Alabama’s request can be directed to Levi Lall at 202-598-0771. Public materials about Alabama’s request, as well as details about the review process, are available to view at https://www.justice.gov/olp/pending-requests-final-decisions. The notice is dated August 4, 2025, and was signed by Nicholas J. Schilling Jr., Supervisory Official of the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Policy. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Justice Seeks Public Comment on Tennessee Death Penalty Lawyers Request Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes On August 7, 2025, the Department of Justice published a notice about Tennessee’s request for federal certification of its capital counsel mechanism. The State of Tennessee has asked the U.S. Attorney General for certification of its system to provide lawyers for people sentenced to death. The state wants approval that it meets federal rules for appointing, paying, and supporting lawyers for those who cannot afford legal help in death penalty cases. The rules for this come from Chapter 154 of Title 28 in the United States Code. These rules give states special procedures for federal court review of death penalty cases, but only if the state has set up a fair way for poor prisoners to get qualified lawyers and pay their legal costs. Now, the public can send comments about Tennessee’s request. People can write or make electronic comments until October 6, 2025. Mailed comments must be postmarked by that date. Online comments are open until Midnight Eastern Time on October 6, 2025. Comments must say “Docket No. OLP180” to help the Department handle them correctly. Electronic comments should be sent via www.regulations.gov. Paper comments should not copy the electronic version. For questions, contact Levi Lall, Counsel at the Office of Legal Policy, U.S. Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20530. Phone: 202-598-0771. The public can read Tennessee’s request and the facts supporting it at https://www.justice.gov/olp/pending-requests-final-decisions. This notice was signed by Nicholas J. Schilling Jr., Supervisory Official in the Office of Legal Policy, on August 4, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

DEA Proposes Permanent Schedule I Placement for Five Designer Benzodiazepines Estimated reading time: 4–5 minutes The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) has announced a proposed rule to place five substances—clonazolam, diclazepam, etizolam, flualprazolam, and flubromazolam—in Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). The proposal includes each substance and its salts, isomers, and salts of isomers. These substances were temporarily placed in Schedule I on July 26, 2023, due to concerns about an imminent hazard to public safety. The temporary order was later extended to July 26, 2026. If this proposed rule is finalized, it will make these controls permanent. Why Are These Substances Being Scheduled? According to the DEA, these five substances have a high potential for abuse. They are chemically and pharmacologically similar to classical benzodiazepines, like diazepam and alprazolam. These classical drugs are widely abused and can cause dependence. The DEA and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) reviewed scientific and medical evidence about these substances. The review found that: They are not approved for any medical use in the United States. There are no accepted safety standards for their use under medical supervision. They have been linked to abuse, dependence, and serious health risks. Evidence and Data No legitimate sources, such as approved medicines, exist for these five substances in the United States. They are not used or manufactured legally and are mostly obtained from illegal sources or foreign countries. The DEA and HHS collected the following data: Over 50,000 encounters of these substances by law enforcement, from every state and Washington, DC. Evidence from U.S. poison centers and toxicology programs showing hundreds of cases involving these drugs, including deadly overdoses. Studies and user reports showing these drugs can cause strong sedative effects, impaired driving, and physical dependence. Some are more potent than known prescription benzodiazepines. Risks to Public Health The five substances act as strong depressants on the central nervous system. They can cause drowsiness, confusion, poor coordination, and breathing trouble. People have died from overdoses involving these drugs, especially when mixed with other substances like opioids. Reports show that people of all adult ages, and both sexes, have been harmed. Often, these drugs are used alone or with other dangerous drugs like fentanyl or stimulants. Legal and International Obligations The United States is required by the United Nations Convention on Psychotropic Substances (1971) to control these substances because other countries voted to add them to international lists. What Will Happen Under Permanent Scheduling? If permanently placed in Schedule I: It will be illegal to manufacture, distribute, import, export, or possess these substances except for DEA-approved research. They will be subject to strict storage and recordkeeping rules. Only DEA-registered persons will be allowed to handle these substances. Penalties for unauthorized activity would include criminal, civil, and administrative actions. Public Input and Comments The public can comment on this proposed rule until August 25, 2025. Comments can be made electronically at regulations.gov or mailed to the DEA office. People who want a hearing must ask before the same deadline. Small Business Impact DEA states that very few suppliers or researchers use these substances for legal research. The rule is not expected to impact a significant number of small businesses. How the Rule Changes Regulations If the rule becomes final, it will remove the substances from the temporary list and add them to the permanent list of Schedule I controlled substances under 21 CFR 1308.11(e). Contact Information For more information, contact Dr. Terrence L. Boos at the DEA, phone: (571) 362-3249. Conclusion The DEA’s proposal aims to keep U.S. laws in line with international treaties and protect public health. Clonazolam, diclazepam, etizolam, flualprazolam, and flubromazolam will remain closely controlled due to the dangers they pose. The public is invited to review and comment before the rule is finalized. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

DEA Extends Temporary Ban on Five Designer Benzodiazepines Until 2026 Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes What Are the Banned Substances? The substances included in this order are: Clonazolam Diclazepam Etizolam Flualprazolam Flubromazolam These include their salts, isomers, and salts of isomers. Background On July 26, 2023, the DEA first placed these five substances under Schedule I due to an “imminent hazard to the public safety.” That two-year ban was set to end on July 26, 2025. The DEA says it needs more time to finish permanent scheduling rules. Legal Process The Controlled Substances Act allows the DEA to make temporary bans for up to two years. The ban can be extended for one more year if work to make the ban permanent is not finished. The Acting Administrator of the DEA started the process for a permanent ban. The DEA is publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking about this in the Federal Register. Regulatory Details The extension of the ban is not a regular rule but an order. This order is not subject to notice-and-comment rulemaking. The extension uses authority under 21 U.S.C. 811(h), which allows an expedited action to avoid risks to public safety. The DEA says that more delays would be against the public interest. Not extending the ban now could create risks if the substances became legal again before permanent rules are ready. Impacts on the Public Under Schedule I, these drugs are illegal to make, distribute, import, export, research, or possess unless specially permitted. Anyone handling these substances is subject to the same controls and penalties as with other Schedule I drugs. Why the Ban? The DEA explains that these five designer benzodiazepines pose a risk to public health. They used their emergency powers to make and extend this temporary ban. Administrative Information The order was signed on July 22, 2025, by Acting Administrator Robert J. Murphy. The official document was filed for publication and sent to both Houses of Congress and to the Comptroller General, although this is not legally required since it is an order, not a rule. Effective Date The order is effective July 26, 2025, and will stay in effect until July 26, 2026, unless permanent rules are made before then. Contact Questions can be directed to Terrence L. Boos, Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section, Diversion Control Division, DEA, at 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, VA 22152, phone (571) 362-3249. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Justice Requests Comments on New User Access Form for EPIC System Portal Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), part of the Department of Justice (DOJ), has announced a new information collection request. The form is called the User Access Request Form for the EPIC System Portal (ESP). This form will be used by law enforcement personnel at the federal, state, local, and tribal levels. They need this form to request access to the El Paso Intelligence Center (EPIC) System Portal. The portal lets approved users see information about drug and human trafficking, firearms smuggling, money laundering, and other crimes. The DEA is submitting this request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review, following the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Public comments about the request are open for 60 days, ending September 23, 2025. The Department asks the public and other agencies to give feedback. They want comments on: Whether this information collection is needed. If the estimates about the burden on the public are correct. How the information collected can be improved for quality and usefulness. How to reduce the effort required to fill out the form, including by using better technology or allowing electronic submissions. The main purpose of the form is to collect enough information to approve new users for the EPIC System Portal. It is important for security and to meet federal law enforcement rules. Key Details of the Information Collection: Type: New collection. Title: User Access Request Form for the EPIC System Portal. Form Number: To be assigned after OMB approval. The Drug Enforcement Administration is responsible for this form. Who is Affected: Federal, state, local, and tribal law enforcement personnel wanting to access the portal. Filling out the form is required to get access. Estimated Respondents: 1,000 people per year. Time Per Response: About 7 minutes per form. Total Burden: 1,000 responses are expected each year, leading to a total estimated burden of 116.67 hours per year. Annual Cost Burden: The estimated yearly cost of this information collection is $4,666.80. The Department noted that the total burden hours and cost are based on the number of people expected to fill out the form and the time needed. Those seeking more information or a copy of the form may contact Benjamin Inks at the Office of Compliance, Policy Administration Section, Arlington, VA (telephone: 571-672-4524). For general questions, Darwin Arceo is listed as the Department Clearance Officer at the Justice Management Division, Washington, DC. Notice issued: July 23, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Bytecode Alliance Foundation Updates Membership in Official Notice Estimated reading time: 2–3 minutes On May 29, 2025, the Bytecode Alliance Foundation filed an official notification under section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. This law is found at 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. The notification was sent to both the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. It shared changes in the group’s membership. Renderlet, Inc., located in Brooklyn, New York, has joined the Bytecode Alliance Foundation as a party to this venture. SingleStore, based in San Francisco, California, has withdrawn as a party from this venture. No other changes have been made in the membership or the planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project is still open. The Bytecode Alliance Foundation plans to send more written notifications for all membership changes in the future. The Bytecode Alliance Foundation first filed its original notification on April 20, 2022, under section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the Federal Register under section 6(b) of the Act on May 13, 2022. The citation is 87 FR 29379. The last notification before this was filed on March 19, 2025. A notice was published in the Federal Register on April 21, 2025. The citation is 90 FR 16704. Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations in the Antitrust Division, signed the notice. The official Federal Register document number is 2025-14051. This notice was filed on July 24, 2025, and appeared in Volume 90, Number 141 on page 35313. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

New Members and Withdrawals in 1EdTech Consortium Announced Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Department of Justice Antitrust Division released a notice about the 1EdTech Consortium, Inc. This notice was published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 141, on Friday, July 25, 2025. The notice states that 1EdTech Consortium, Inc. filed a report on May 29, 2025. This report was sent to both the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. The report was made according to the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. The report says that new members have joined the 1EdTech Consortium. The new members are: Aurora Public Schools (CO), Aurora, CO University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, NC Tuscaloosa City Schools, Tuscaloosa, AL Terrace Metrics, Inc., Cincinnati, OH Texas Education Agency, Austin, TX ViewSonic Education Agency, Brea, CA Morgan State University, Baltimore, MD The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX International Baccalaureate Organization, Cardiff, UNITED KINGDOM Navigatr, Leeds, UNITED KINGDOM Alexander Becker (individual member), Berlin, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY The following groups or companies have withdrawn from 1EdTech Consortium: KERIS, Dong-gu, REPUBLIC OF KOREA Udemy, San Francisco, CA Cisco, San Jose, CA Swedish National Agency for Education (Statens skolverk), Solna, KINGDOM OF SWEDEN Partners4Results, Waukesha, WI Switch Energy Alliance, Austin, TX Siemens, Munich, FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY There are no further changes in membership or planned activities. The membership for this group remains open. 1EdTech Consortium plans to file more updates about membership changes. The 1EdTech Consortium first reported its activities under the law on April 7, 2000. The Department of Justice first published a related notice on September 13, 2000 (65 FR 55283). The most recent earlier notification was made on March 17, 2025. That notice was published in the Federal Register on April 21, 2025 (90 FR 16702). Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director for Civil Enforcement Operations in the Antitrust Division, signed the notice. The official Federal Register document identifier is FR Doc. 2025-14054. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Notice of Membership Change in Decentralized Storage Alliance Association Estimated reading time: 2–4 minutes On July 25, 2025, the Department of Justice Antitrust Division published a notice in the Federal Register about changes in the Decentralized Storage Alliance Association (DSAA). The notice states that on May 27, 2025, DSAA filed written notifications with both the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. This action was done under the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. The filing’s purpose is to extend legal protections. It limits the damages that antitrust plaintiffs can recover to actual damages under specific conditions. MetaProof Inc., based in New York, NY, has been added as a party to the DSAA venture. No other changes have been made to the membership or the group’s planned activities. Membership in the research project is still open. DSAA plans to keep the Department updated about future changes in membership. DSAA originally filed notification under the Act on August 1, 2023. The Department published information about this in the Federal Register on October 6, 2023 (88 FR 69670). The previous update was filed on December 9, 2024. That notice was published on February 3, 2025 (90 FR 8816). This notice was issued by Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director, Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

America’s DataHub Consortium Updates Membership Estimated reading time: 3 minutes On June 16, 2025, America’s DataHub Consortium (ADC) sent official notifications about changes in its membership. These notifications were given to the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission. This action follows the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993. The new members joining ADC are: 22nd Century Technologies, Inc., McLean, VA Daniel H. Wagner Associates, Inc., Hampton, VA Discovery Machine, Inc., Williamsport, PA Industry Defense Systems LLC, Lansdale, PA ISSAC LLC, Colorado Springs, CO JLGOV LLC, Virginia Beach, VA L3Harris Technologies, Inc., Clifton, NJ Magnum Multimedia, Inc., Herndon, VA Turnkey Federal LLC, Tampa, FL Two members have left the consortium: JIL NZ LLC, Chevy Chase, MD ZCTS LLC, Arlington, VA No other changes were made to the group’s membership or its planned activities. Membership in this group remains open. ADC will continue to provide notifications about future changes in its membership. ADC first filed notification under the Act on November 11, 2021. The Department of Justice published a notice about that filing on December 22, 2021 (86 FR 72628). The most recent notification before this one was filed with the Department on March 6, 2025. A notice for the March 2025 filing was published in the Federal Register on April 21, 2025 (90 FR 16702). Suzanne Morris, Deputy Director of Civil Enforcement Operations for the Antitrust Division, reported this information in the Federal Register on July 25, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

DEA Revokes Registration of Dr. Taha Dias, M.D. in Florida Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes Background and Order Issued On November 4, 2024, the DEA sent an Order to Show Cause (OSC) to Dr. Taha Dias. The DEA warned that he might lose his DEA registration. The DEA said Dr. Dias gave out prescriptions for controlled substances in ways that were not allowed by law. These actions were seen as inconsistent with public interest. The DEA cited violations of both federal and Florida state law. Service of Order A DEA Diversion Investigator (DI) served the OSC to Dr. Dias. The DI sent it by email and by mail to his registered addresses. On November 22, 2024, Dr. Dias spoke with the DI. He was told about the OSC and what it meant. Details of Violations Between July 2022 and December 2023, Dr. Dias gave prescriptions for controlled substances that were outside the usual course of professional practice. He did not follow federal law 21 CFR 1306.04(a) or Florida Statutes Sec. 456.44(3). Dr. Dias did not reply to the DEA’s charges. The DEA says this means Dr. Dias admits to the facts described in the OSC. Dr. Dias admitted he wrote nine prescriptions for promethazine with codeine to nine different people, knowing the drugs would be obtained by someone else and not those named. On July 5, 2022, he texted a local pharmacist about sending these prescriptions, which were not for a real medical reason. Dr. Dias also admitted he wrote nine prescriptions for controlled substances to a person named M.S. between December 9, 2022, and December 4, 2023. M.S. was in a correctional facility when these prescriptions were written. Dr. Dias did not do a medical exam or create a real doctor-patient relationship for these prescriptions either. In total, Dr. Dias gave out at least 18 prescriptions that had no real medical purpose and were not allowed by his profession’s rules. Legal Findings and Process The DEA stated that under federal and Florida law, doctors must only prescribe controlled substances for real medical reasons and after proper exams. They must keep detailed patient records. The DEA found Dr. Dias did not follow these rules. In cases like this, the DEA checks five factors to decide if someone should keep their registration. The DEA mainly considered Dr. Dias’s compliance with laws and his experience with controlled substances. No evidence was found of state medical license problems or crime convictions for Dr. Dias. But the DEA said the main problem was how Dr. Dias prescribed the drugs. Sanction and Final Decision The DEA said Dr. Dias did not reply to the charges or try to explain his actions. He did not show he accepted responsibility or would follow the law in the future. Because of these reasons, the DEA revoked Dr. Dias’s DEA Certificate of Registration No. BD9971208. The DEA also denied any of his pending applications to renew or change his registration or to apply for a new registration in Florida. This order takes effect on August 25, 2025. Signed Order The order was signed on July 21, 2025, by Acting Administrator Robert J. Murphy. Reference: Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 141, Friday, July 25, 2025, Pages 35313-35315. [FR Doc No: 2025-14077] Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Justice Seeks Public Comment on Movie Theater Accessibility Notice Requirements Estimated reading time: 4–9 minutes The Department of Justice (DOJ), Civil Rights Division, is asking for public comments on the rules that require movie theaters to tell people if closed movie captioning and audio description are available for digital movies. This request is part of a review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Why This is Happening Under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), movie theaters must not discriminate against people with disabilities. Federal law at 42 U.S.C. 12182 says that public places like movie theaters must provide aids and services for people with disabilities. Movie theaters that show digital movies and offer captioning or audio description must make sure all their notices—including signs at the box office, on websites, mobile apps, in newspapers, or over the phone—tell people which movies have these services. This is required by the rule at 28 CFR 36.303(g)(8). Who Must Follow These Rules These rules apply to any business or not-for-profit group that owns, operates, or leases a movie theater (but not drive-in theaters) that shows digital movies to the public for a fee. All theater firms that show digital movies with these features must let the public know in their movie listings if closed captioning or audio description is available. It is mandatory for these firms to follow this rule. Details About the Requirement The DOJ says that almost all U.S. movie theaters now show digital movies that can have closed captions and audio descriptions. Whenever these theaters tell the public about movie showings—such as by updating weekly movie listings—they must include information about the availability of these accessibility features. Estimated Effort to Meet the Requirement There are about 1,813 firms in the U.S. owning one or more movie theaters, according to 2022 U.S. Census Bureau data. Each firm is expected to spend about 10 minutes per week updating movie listings for closed captions and audio description information. Over a year, this is about 8.7 hours per firm for complying with the requirement. Summary Table of Burden Activity Number of Respondents Times per Year Total Responses Time per Response (minutes) Total Annual Hours Weekly update of movie listings 1,813 52 94,276 10 15,713 Total Annual Estimated Hours All firms together are expected to spend about 15,713 hours yearly to meet this requirement. Estimated Cost There is no new cost for theaters to meet this rule. Updating movie listings is already a normal part of movie theater business. The extra work to add symbols or notes about accessibility features is considered small. How to Give Comments Anyone can send comments until September 23, 2025. Comments should focus on: If the information is needed, If the burden estimates are correct, Ways to improve the quality and clarity, Ideas to make responding easier. Comments can be sent by mail to the Department of Justice in Washington, DC, by email, or to the Office of Management and Budget. Make sure to include the title: “Requirement that Movie Theaters Provide Notice as to the Availability of Closed Movie Captioning and Audio Description for Digital Movies.” Who to Contact for More Information For more information about this plan or to get materials in another format, contact Roberta Kirkendall, Special Litigation Counsel, Disability Rights Section, Civil Rights Division, U.S. Department of Justice, by mail or call the ADA Information Line at (800) 514-0301 (voice) or (800) 514-0383 (TTY). Conclusion This required information helps people with hearing or vision disabilities learn which digital movies have closed captions or audio description. The DOJ is seeking public comments before the rules become final. Published: July 25, 2025 Federal Register, Volume 90, Issue 141 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Justice Seeks Public Comments on National Crime Victimization Survey Changes Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes On July 24, 2025, the Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), published a notice in the Federal Register about the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS). The BJS is asking the public for comments on a planned update for the NCVS. The updates must be approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). The public can send comments for 60 days, ending on September 22, 2025. The NCVS collects national information about how often people in the United States experience crime. The survey counts crimes both reported and not reported to the police. The NCVS also collects data on how police handle reports and how safe people feel in their communities. Every so often, the survey process is updated. The 2026 update uses new methods to better represent the U.S. population using 2020 census data. Details of the Collection: Type: This is a revision of a currently approved collection. Title: National Crime Victimization Survey. Form Numbers: NCVS-1 and NCVS-2. Agency: Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs. Who Responds: U.S. residents age 12 or older living in selected households. Responding is voluntary. Estimates for the Survey: Total Respondents per Year: 157,439 people. Time to Complete Survey (Average Interview): 34.4 minutes. Time for Non-Interviewed Respondents: 9.3 minutes. Follow-up Interview Time: 7 minutes. Follow-up for Non-interview: 1 minute. Annual Burden (Total Hours): 123,202 hours. Annual Cost Burden: $0. Burden Hours by Activity: Activity Respondents Frequency Annual Responses Time per Response (minutes) Annual Burden (hours) Interviewed 91,312 2 182,624 34.4 104,698 Non-interviewed 56,772 2 113,544 9.3 17,599 Re-interview (Interviews) 7,484 1 7,484 7.0 873 Re-interview (Non-interviews) 1,871 1 1,871 1.0 31 Unduplicated Totals 157,439 — 305,523 — 123,202 How to Comment or Get More Information: Those with suggestions or questions can contact Rachel Morgan, Chief of the Victimization Statistics Unit at the BJS. Her office is located at 999 N Capitol Street NE, Washington, DC 20531. Email and phone contacts are also provided: [email protected], 202-307-0765. For further information, Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer at the DOJ, is also listed as a contact. Key Points for Comments: The DOJ asks the public to focus on these points in their comments: Is the survey needed for the BJS to do its job well? Are the time estimates and methods correct? Can the collected information be improved? Can the burden on respondents be reduced by using technology? The deadline for public comments is September 22, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Justice Proposes New Data Collection for Violence Against Women Act Grants Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The Office on Violence Against Women (OVW), part of the Department of Justice, has announced a new proposal for collecting information from grantees of programs under the Violence Against Women Act (VAWA). These changes are explained in a notice published in the Federal Register on July 24, 2025. What is the New Plan? The OVW wants to combine 19 current performance reporting forms into one new, streamlined system. This system will collect data from groups that receive money under VAWA. It will cover both “formula” programs, such as STOP and SASP, and “discretionary” programs. This means all grantees and subgrantees will use the same online reporting platform. Who Will Use This System? The new system will be used by: Formula grant program administrators Formula grant subgrantees Discretionary grant program grantees These groups include local, state, and tribal governments, courts, non-profits, schools, colleges, coalitions, and other groups. How Does It Work? The new system uses a web-based form. The form is tailored for each grant program. Grantees will only complete sections about activities funded by their grant. Why Change the Old System? Currently, 19 different forms are in use, collecting similar or repetitive data in different ways. The new plan will: Make reporting easier and faster Use clearer questions Cut out repeated questions Allow electronic submission This is expected to improve the quality, usability, and consistency of the data. It will also make future updates easier if VAWA or government needs change. How Much Work Will This Involve? The estimate for reporting is: About 6,112 groups will need to report Each form takes about 60 minutes to complete The workload for each group is: Formula administrators: 112 responses per year (once a year per respondent) Formula subgrantees: 3,000 responses per year (once per respondent) Discretionary grantees: 6,000 responses per year (twice per respondent) The total amount of reporting time is estimated at 9,112 hours per year. How Much Does It Cost? The OVW estimates the total annual cost to review the reports and keep the system running is $800,000. What Happens Next? This is a proposed plan. The OVW wants public feedback. Comments will be accepted until September 22, 2025. If you have questions or want to comment, contact Tiffany Watson at the Office on Violence Against Women at 202-307-6026, or email OVW for a copy of the collection instrument or more information. Conclusion The Department of Justice is working to make it easier and faster for groups to report on activities funded by Violence Against Women Act grants. The new system is designed to cut paperwork and improve the way data is collected and used. Groups affected by these changes can learn more and share their feedback before September 22. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Justice Proposes Changes to National Prisoner Statistics Program Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS), a part of the U.S. Department of Justice, is planning to update the National Prisoner Statistics program (NPS). The BJS has asked the public for comments on this plan. Comments will be accepted for 60 days, ending on September 22, 2025. Information Collected The NPS program collects yearly numbers about prisoners held by state and federal prisons. It tracks the number of people admitted and released. The information is used to report on how people move through the prison system each year. This helps the BJS show changes in the prison population and supports the work of many people. Key Changes One change is that questions about HIV/AIDS will be removed. These may come back in special health supplements in the future. The BJS also plans to test a new way to collect race and ethnicity data. This matches the rules in the 2024 OMB Statistical Policy Directive No. 15. The BJS will also check if more race and ethnicity data can be collected from the current data systems. Who Must Report NPS-1B: Used by 51 reporters (one from each state and the Federal Bureau of Prisons). NPS-1B(T): Used by five reporters from U.S. Territories or Commonwealths (Guam, Puerto Rico, Northern Mariana Islands, Virgin Islands, American Samoa). Information Required from States and Federal Prisons Each year, the 51 reporters must give details including: The number of men and women in prison as of December 31, sorted by sentence length and if they are unsentenced. How many people are housed in private, county, or other facilities. Admission types: new court commitments, parole violators, other transfers, and returns. Release types: finished sentences, commutations, probation, parole, deaths by cause, transfers, and other categories. Prisoners by race and Hispanic origin. U.S. citizenship status of prisoners. The source used for citizenship data. The capacities of prisons, broken down by sex. Information Required from Territories and Commonwealths Each year, the five reporters from the territories must provide: Number of men and women in prison as of December 31 by sentence length, and how complete those numbers are. People sent to other places to reduce overcrowding. Prisoners by race and Hispanic origin. The end-of-year capacities of correctional facilities by sex. Why This Matters The Bureau of Justice Statistics uses the collected information for government reports. These reports are used by Congress, the President, researchers, students, media, and others interested in crime and justice data. Response Details Responding to the survey is voluntary. Each of the 51 main respondents will spend about 4.5 hours each year on the NPS-1B form. The five territory respondents will each spend about 2 hours on the NPS-1B(T) form. The total estimated burden is 795 hours over three years, or about 265 hours per year. The overall cost for all respondents is estimated at $577,000 per year. Contact Information For questions or copies of the data collection forms, contact Derek Mueller, Bureau of Justice Statistics, at 999 N Capitol St. NE, Washington, DC 20531, or call 202-307-0765. If you need more information, you can also contact Darwin Arceo at the Department of Justice, 145 N Street NE, Washington, DC 20530. Publication Information This notice was published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 140, on July 24, 2025. The notice number is 2025-13933. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

DOJ Announces Proposed Changes to Federal Firearms Licensee NICS Forms Estimated reading time: 2-3 minutes The Department of Justice (DOJ), through the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), has announced a proposed revision to the information collection for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs). This proposal was published in the Federal Register on July 24, 2025. The revision concerns important forms related to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). These forms include the FFL Enrollment/NICS E-Check Enrollment Form, the FFL Officer/Employee Acknowledgment of Responsibilities under the NICS Form, and the Responsibilities of an FFL under the NICS Form. The FBI is inviting public comments on the proposed changes. The comment period is open for 60 days, ending September 22, 2025. The changes include adding four new fields to the form. The new questions ask for the FFL’s date of birth and the mother’s maiden name for security reasons. There is also a new question for FFLs in Point of Contact (POC) states. If the FFL operates in a POC state, they must confirm they will use the FBI NICS system for authorized purposes only. The main purpose of collecting this information is to control access to the NICS and NICS Electronic (E-Check) systems. The forms help protect the privacy and security of background check information. They ensure only authorized users, like FFLs and employees in POC states, can use the NICS system. The DOJ estimates that 6,160 respondents will complete these forms each year. Completing and reading the forms takes about 15 minutes per person. This results in a total estimated burden of 1,540 hours yearly. The cost for respondents is $0, as the forms are available online and can be signed digitally. No mailing or copying costs are required. The responses are required for FFLs or POC states to obtain access to the NICS system to perform background checks for firearm sales. Anyone needing more information or wishing to review the proposed information collection can contact Jill Montgomery at the FBI NICS Section in Clarksburg, West Virginia. For official details or to send in comments, the announcement provides contact information for Darwin Arceo, the Department Clearance Officer at the Department of Justice. More information on the NICS is available at https://www.fbi.gov/services/cjis/nics. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

U.S. Marshals Service Requests Comments on Special Deputation Forms Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) is seeking public comments on its Special Deputation Forms. This request was announced by the Department of Justice in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 140, on July 24, 2025. The USMS wants to collect feedback as part of a review required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Comments are being accepted for 60 days, ending on September 22, 2025. Collection Details The USMS is revising its current approval for forms used in the Special Deputation Program. These forms help record and track people deputized to act as Special Deputy U.S. Marshals. Special Deputation is permitted when law enforcement needs arise, as decided by the Associate Attorney General under 28 CFR 0.19(a)(3). There are two main forms: USM-3A: Application for Special Deputation/Sponsoring Federal Agency Information. USM-3C: Group Special Deputation Request. These forms are completed by State, Local, and Tribal Governments. Estimated Usage and Burden USM-3A: It is estimated that 8,000 respondents will use this form every year. Each form will take about 10 minutes to complete. This adds up to around 1,333 total annual burden hours. USM-3C: Around 300 respondents are expected to use this form annually, with each taking about 15 minutes. This totals 75 annual burden hours. The annual cost burden for both forms is estimated at $0.00. Table of Annual Burden Activity Number of Respondents Frequency (Annually) Total Annual Responses Time per Response (Mins) Total Annual Burden (Hours) USM-3A Application for Special Deputation 8,000 1 8,000 10 1,333 USM-3C Group Special Deputation Request 300 1 300 15 75 Total 8,300 1,408 Instructions for Comments The USMS is asking for comments about the following points: Is the information necessary for the agency’s work? Is the estimated burden and response time correct? Can the quality and clarity be improved? How can the burden on respondents be reduced, for example, by using electronic submissions? People needing more information or wishing to submit comments can contact Assistant Chief Karl Slazer, Management Support Division, US Marshals Service Headquarters, 1215 S Clark St., Ste. 10017, Arlington, VA 22202-4387. Phone: 703-740-2316, or email: [email protected]. If further information is needed, contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, Justice Management Division, U.S. Department of Justice. The notice is signed by Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer for PRA, dated July 22, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Justice Department Corrects Notice on Immigration Appeal Form Fees After Recent Law Change Estimated reading time: 3–5 minutes The Department of Justice (DOJ) has released a correction regarding the collection of information for the Notice of Appeal From a Decision of an Immigration Judge, Form EOIR-26. The correction was published in the Federal Register on July 23, 2025, by the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). The update relates to an earlier notice that appeared in the Federal Register on July 1, 2025. This correction adds one more change to the information collection process. EOIR will submit the updated collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval. This follows rules found in the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The comment period for this proposed change is still open until September 2, 2025. Anyone needing more information or wishing to comment on the public burden, response time, or methods related to this collection, can contact Justine Fuga, Associate General Counsel, at the EOIR. Contact details are: Address: 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600, Falls Church, VA 22041 Telephone: (703) 305-0265 Email: [Contact information provided in the original source] The correction makes the instructions for how to file Form EOIR-26, both by mail and electronically, more clear. It also updates information about new filing fees. These fee changes are the result of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), H.R. 1, which became law on July 4, 2025. The corrected estimated annual cost is $12,747,978 for the public. According to EOIR estimates: 12,487 responses each year come from applicants who have to pay a filing fee. 647 responses come from Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement (DHS ICE) employees, who are not required to pay a filing fee. The cost per response is as follows: For regular applicants: $0.80 for printing, $10.10 for postage, and $1,010 for the filing fee. The total per response is $1,020.90. For DHS ICE: $0.80 for printing, $10.10 for postage, and no filing fee. The total per response is $10.90. Total annual costs are calculated as follows: $1,020.90 multiplied by 12,487 responses equals $12,747,978 for applicants required to pay. $10.90 multiplied by 647 responses equals $7,052 for DHS ICE. The correction is signed by Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer for PRA, DOJ. This update ensures the information collection aligns with the new law and provides clarity on costs and filing instructions. The public and interested parties may continue to submit comments until September 2, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Justice Proposes New Rules on Federal Firearm Rights Restoration Estimated reading time: 8–10 minutes On July 22, 2025, the Department of Justice published a proposed rule in the Federal Register. The rule sets out how people can apply for relief from federal laws that stop them from having guns. Why the Rule Is Needed The Gun Control Act makes it illegal for some people to have firearms. This includes people with certain criminal records, people with mental health commitments, and others considered dangerous. But the Act also gives people a way to ask for their rights back. This is called “relief from disabilities.” Before 2025, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) handled these requests. Problems appeared. There were not enough rules for deciding who should get their rights back. Some dangerous people got their rights restored, and later, committed crimes. Because of this, Congress stopped ATF from using funds to process these applications in 1992. Recently, the Attorney General took authority away from ATF and announced a new rule would be made. About the Proposed Rule The new rule sets out clear criteria for granting relief. It tries to keep dangerous people from getting guns, while respecting the Second Amendment. Presumptive Disqualifications Convictions for violent or dangerous felonies like murder, sexual assault, kidnapping, domestic violence, burglary, robbery, arson, and more. Felony sex offenses. People required to register as sex offenders. Anyone convicted of a felony using guns or explosives. Anyone convicted in the past 10 years of drug distribution crimes. Anyone convicted in the past 10 years for a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence, or shown to still be violent. Anyone convicted in the past 5 years for other felony offenses. People currently in prison or on probation, parole, or supervision. People subject to certain other gun disqualifications (like being a fugitive, using illegal drugs, being under restraining orders, or being in the country illegally). Anyone denied under these rules in the past. Looking at the Whole Story The Attorney General can look at all the facts of a person’s case—not just the official name of the crime. This means the actual conduct, not just the law’s wording, is used to decide eligibility. The rule says applications will also require input from local law enforcement. What Applicants Must Do Applicants must give: Detailed records about past convictions. Proof that criminal sentences are completed. Reference letters from people not related to them. Personal affirmations about their behavior and character. Notification to the chief law enforcement officer in their area. Applicants must show they are not dangerous and that restoring their rights is in the public interest. Fees The Department estimates about 1 million people will apply in the first year. Applicants must pay a $20 fee (unless poor, then a waiver may be requested). This covers costs for handling the applications. Reviewing Applications The Attorney General will review each applicant’s full criminal record, behavior during supervision, time since release, current mental health, community reputation, drug or alcohol use, and more. Input from police chiefs or sheriffs will be considered. Any false information in the application can cause removal of granted rights. Other Points The relief applies only to federal gun laws. State gun bans are not changed by this rule. The rule applies to people and gun dealers. Changes are made to access federal gun background system records. If rights are restored but the person commits a new crime, the relief can be taken back. How to Comment Comments on the rule are due by October 20, 2025. People can use regulations.gov or mail a comment to the U.S. Department of Justice. Impact The Department says the rule will help protect public safety, make the process clearer, and allow fair restoration of rights. It says the new system will be fair and follow the law. For more details, see the Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 138, pages 34394–34405, dated July 22, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Justice Requests Public Comments on EOIR-31 Form Renewal Estimated reading time: 6–10 minutes The Department of Justice (DOJ) has issued a notice about renewing the information collection for the EOIR-31 form. This form is used by non-profit religious, charitable, social service, or similar organizations to request recognition from the Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR). The EOIR wants public comments about this information collection. Comments will be accepted for 30 days, until August 18, 2025. The DOJ is asking for feedback on the form’s necessity, how much time it takes to fill out, how to make it better, and how to make it easier to complete, possibly with new technology. The notice says this review is required by the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DOJ will submit the request to continue using this form to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for the next three years. The OMB cannot approve the form for more than three years without renewal. Form EOIR-31 is Used For: Requesting new recognition for an organization. Requesting renewal of recognition. Requesting to extend recognition from one office to another. The form lets organizations ask to be allowed to help people in immigration proceedings before EOIR and/or the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). This is only for non-profit organizations that want to provide legal services in immigration cases. The EOIR-31 form follows U.S. laws under 8 U.S.C. 1103, 1229a, 1362, and 8 CFR 1292.11-19. The form can be completed as a fillable PDF or through an electronic system. Recent changes to the form include updates to the Privacy Act notice, the expiration date for OMB approval, changes to the submission address, and another way to submit completed forms. Who Must Respond: Non-profit organizations who want to be recognized as legal service providers in immigration cases by the Assistant Director for Policy at EOIR. Obligation to Complete the Form: Filling out the form is voluntary. But, organizations that do not submit the required information may not have their recognition request considered. Estimated Number of Respondents Each Year: 210 organizations for new recognition. 90 organizations for renewal of recognition. 20 organizations for extension of recognition to another office. Estimated Time to Complete the Form: 2 hours for new recognition. 7 hours for renewal of recognition. 2 hours for extension to another office. Total Annual Time Burden: 1,090 hours for all respondents. Estimated Annual Other Costs: $0 (no cost except time for respondents). How to Submit Comments: Comments and recommendations should be submitted within 30 days of this notice. Go to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain. Click on “Currently under 30-day Review—Open for Public Comments” or search for the title or OMB Control Number 1125-0012 to find this information collection. Need More Information? For details or a copy of the collection instrument, contact Justine Fuga, Associate General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel, Executive Office for Immigration Review, 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600, Falls Church, VA 22041. Telephone: (703) 305-0265. If you need further information, contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, Justice Management Division, U.S. Department of Justice, Two Constitution Square, 145 N Street NE, 4W-218 Washington, DC 20530. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

Department of Justice Seeks Public Comments on Non-Attorney Representative Accreditation Form Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes The Executive Office for Immigration Review (EOIR), part of the Department of Justice, is asking for public comments on a form used to request accreditation or renewal of accreditation for non-attorney representatives. This request is published in the Federal Register, Volume 90, Issue 136, on Friday, July 18, 2025. Background and Purpose The EOIR will send the information collection request for Form EOIR-31A to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This is for approval under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. The collection is needed for non-profit organizations seeking accreditation for their representatives who are not attorneys. These representatives can help people in immigration cases before EOIR and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS). How to Comment Public comments are welcome for 30 days, until August 18, 2025. Comments can include: Whether the form is necessary for EOIR’s work and if it is useful. If the agency’s estimate of how much time the form takes is correct. Ways to make the form better or clearer. Suggestions to lessen the burden for people who fill out the form, including using electronic submissions. Written comments and recommendations should be submitted at www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain by searching for OMB Control Number 1125-0013 or the form’s title. Details of the Collection Type: Extension of a previously approved collection. Title: Request by Organization for Accreditation or Renewal Accreditation of Non-Attorney Representative. Form Number: EOIR-31A. Who Responds: Non-profit organizations that want their representatives accredited or reaccredited by the EOIR’s Assistant Director for Policy. Why the Form Is Important Organizations use this form to ask for accreditation for their representatives to appear in immigration court or before DHS. The form helps EOIR decide if representatives meet the legal requirements under 8 U.S.C. 1103, 1229a, 1362, and 8 CFR 1292.11-19. The latest changes to the form include an updated Privacy Act notice, expiration date, a new address for submissions, and a new electronic submission option. Is Responding Required? The form is voluntary. However, not providing the information may stop EOIR from considering an accreditation request. Estimated Numbers and Time Initial Accreditation: 747 respondents per year, each taking about 3 hours to complete. Renewal: 314 respondents per year, each taking about 7 hours to complete. Total Annual Respondents: 1,061. Total Annual Time Burden: 4,439 hours. Estimated Other Annual Costs: $0. Contact for More Information If you want more information about this collection, you can contact: Justine Fuga, Associate General Counsel, Office of the General Counsel Executive Office for Immigration Review 5107 Leesburg Pike, Suite 2600 Falls Church, VA 22041 Phone: (703) 305-0265 For further details, you may also contact Darwin Arceo, Department Clearance Officer, Policy and Planning Staff, Justice Management Division, Department of Justice, 145 N Street NE, 4W-218, Washington, DC 20530. Document Details DARWIN ARCEO Department Clearance Officer for PRA U.S. Department of Justice Dated: July 16, 2025 Federal Register Document Number: 2025-13519 Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

DEA Revokes Webb’s Square Pharmacy Registration Over Illegal Drug Dispensing Estimated reading time: 4–8 minutes On July 14, 2025, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) announced that it has revoked the DEA registration of JYA LLC, also known as Webb’s Square Pharmacy, located in Davenport, Florida. This decision comes after findings that the pharmacy dispensed controlled substances without valid prescriptions and against legal requirements. Background On November 18, 2024, Webb’s Square Pharmacy received an Order to Show Cause and Immediate Suspension of Registration. The DEA suspended the pharmacy’s Certificate of Registration (No. FJ2231570) because it believed that keeping the pharmacy registered was an imminent danger to the public. Hearing Process and Default The pharmacy’s contact person received the order in person on November 21, 2024. Under the law, the pharmacy had 30 days to ask for a hearing. The DEA states that the pharmacy did not request a hearing and did not respond to the charges. Because of this, the pharmacy is considered to have admitted all the facts in the order and is in default. Pharmacy Law and Responsibilities Pharmacies must follow the Controlled Substances Act (CSA). The law says controlled drugs can only be dispensed for a real medical reason and with a valid prescription from a doctor. Both doctors and pharmacists are responsible for following these rules. Florida law says a pharmacist must not fill a prescription if they believe it is not for a real medical purpose or if there is no true doctor-patient relationship. Pharmacists are supposed to check that any prescription for a controlled drug is valid and should refuse to fill it if they cannot resolve their concerns. Facts Admitted by Pharmacy According to the DEA, Webb’s Square Pharmacy: Dispensed about 312 prescriptions for controlled drugs between July 2022 and March 2024. Gave out controlled drugs after multiple text message conversations between the owner/pharmacist-in-charge and other parties, including a doctor and outside individuals. Knew or should have known that these were not legitimate prescriptions. Allowed third parties with no legitimate connection to patients to pick up drugs. Repeatedly did not attempt to check if prescriptions were real or for a valid medical purpose. Details of Unlawful Dispensing Some specific details include: In July 2022 and January 2023, the pharmacy filled multiple prescriptions for drugs like promethazine with codeine and oxycodone after arrangements between the pharmacist and a doctor, knowing the prescriptions were invalid. The pharmacy dispensed drugs like promethazine with codeine, alprazolam, and oxycodone for individuals who were not patients or who had no valid prescriptions. Prescriptions were often picked up by people with no medical relationship to the patients. Basis for Revocation The DEA concluded that the pharmacy violated both federal and Florida law many times by filling prescriptions it knew or should have known were not legitimate. The DEA also found that the pharmacy did not try to defend itself or explain its actions during the official process. There was no sign the pharmacy accepted responsibility or showed it could be trusted to follow the law in the future. Decision and Sanction Based on these facts, the DEA decided to revoke the pharmacy’s Certificate of Registration. The agency also denied any pending applications to renew or modify this registration and any new applications for registration in Florida. The order officially takes effect on August 13, 2025. Authority The order is issued under the authority of Acting DEA Administrator Robert J. Murphy and is filed by Heather Achbach, the DEA Federal Register Liaison Officer. Reference Federal Register, Volume 90, Number 132, Notice pages 31244-31247, Document No. 2025-13121, dated July 14, 2025. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.

DEA Revokes Just Here II Pharmacy’s Registration in Philadelphia Estimated reading time: 4–6 minutes Reason for Revocation On October 24, 2024, the DEA sent Just Here II Pharmacy an Order to Show Cause and Immediate Suspension of Registrations. The order explained that the pharmacy’s actions posed an imminent danger to public health and safety. The DEA said the pharmacy’s recordkeeping and inventory practices for controlled substances were not accurate. This violated federal and Pennsylvania state laws. According to the DEA, the pharmacy was unable to account for thousands of doses of controlled substances during an audit. This included large discrepancies in the records of drugs like oxycodone, alprazolam, and promethazine with codeine. For example, the DEA found differences of up to 2,930 dosage units for some medications between the pharmacy’s dispensing reports and distributor order data. In some cases, the discrepancies were as high as 100 percent. Failure to Respond Just Here II Pharmacy did not respond to the OSC/ISO or request a hearing. The DEA considers this a “default,” meaning the pharmacy is treated as if it admitted to the DEA’s allegations. The OSC/ISO was properly served to the pharmacy’s Pharmacist in Charge. Controlled Substances Law The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) and its regulations require pharmacies to keep complete and accurate records of all controlled substances. Both federal and Pennsylvania state law require correct inventory and recordkeeping. Failing to record or maintain accurate data about controlled substances purchases, inventory, or sales breaks these laws. Investigation Findings The DEA determined that between September 27, 2023, and March 1, 2024, Just Here II Pharmacy did not keep accurate records. There were significant differences between the pharmacy’s dispensing data and what distributors recorded. This affected several types of controlled substances, such as: Approximately 200 dosage units of oxycodone HCL 5 mg Approximately 1,459 dosage units of oxycodone HCL 15 mg Approximately 2,930 dosage units of alprazolam 2 mg Approximately 2,839 dosage units of promethazine with codeine The DEA found that the pharmacy failed to maintain required initial and biennial inventories of its stock. Public Interest Decision The DEA considered its guidelines for public interest. Factors such as the pharmacy’s experience dispensing controlled substances and its compliance with laws were considered. The DEA found that Just Here II Pharmacy broke both state and federal laws. There was no evidence to show that the pharmacy could be trusted to follow the law in the future. Since the pharmacy did not participate in the process or accept responsibility, the DEA decided that revoking registration was necessary to protect public health and safety. Final Order The Acting Administrator of the DEA, Robert J. Murphy, signed the order on July 8, 2025. The DEA revoked the pharmacy’s registration and denied any pending applications for renewal or modification. The order takes effect on August 13, 2025. Summary Just Here II Pharmacy’s DEA registration is revoked. The decision is based on failures to keep correct records for controlled substances and not responding to the DEA’s actions. The DEA says this decision helps protect the public from the risks associated with improper recordkeeping of controlled drugs. Legal Disclaimer This article includes content collected from the Federal Register (federalregister.gov). The content is not an official government publication. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For case-specific consultation, please contact us. Read our full Legal Disclaimer, which also includes information on translation accuracy.